Month: August 2009

Cheney again repeats a "Big Lie"

Posted on

https://i0.wp.com/i676.photobucket.com/albums/vv126/kennyrk2/justice.jpg

Cheney on Fox News

“I think the evidence is overwhelming that the Enhanced Interrogation Techniques were crucial in getting them to cooperate, and that the information they provided did in fact save thousands of lives and let us defeat all further attacks against the United States.

The thing I keep coming back to time and time again, Chris, is the fact that we’ve gone for eight years without another attack. Now, how do you explain that?”

I’ll explain it. Cheney was neck deep in the attacks of 9/11 which have been milked by the state to undermine the constitution and create wars with very little backlash. There’s been no need for another false flag. This one worked just fine. For now.

The talk radio apologists/whores are defending Cheney as if their job depends on it. Come to think of it, it does. Limbaugh’s fill in today, Mark Davis, had what was most likely a set up caller who questioned those who doubt the official 9/11 story. Davis then gets to go on a very poor debunking rant and basically calls anyone interested in truth names. You can listen to it here if you are a ‘pills’ member.

Moving around the dial, several other of the radio shills called for the listeners to chime in on torture. All that I heard were for it, do whatever it takes and maybe the ‘terrorists’ won’t get us.

Torture is just a side game that the pervert psychopaths play. Remember the rumors that videos of torture sessions were sent to Cheney for critique? Mass murder and control of whole populations through psyops and the media is where the action is.

Of course Holder’s ‘investigation’ will be nothing more than cover ups and diversions away from the big boys and their big crimes. {see USAG Holder: The man who covered up Waco will now investigate torture?}

There’s a cover up in place, but is Cheney a little worried that there could be slip up? Is that why he continues to go to the media and give justifications (lies..) for all he is responsible for? Bush is quiet. If the heat was on, GW could point the finger at Cheney and say “He’s behind everything, I was just a stooge” and most everyone would agree.

Allan Roland wrote about Cheney in May and the story is still the same…..

Bush, Cheney, and Rumsfeld are the key co-conspirators in the 9/11 cover up and all will soon have their day in court when the appalling truth of America’s most treasonous act is laid bare for the world to see ~ If Obama allows it to happen:

The noose is slowly closing on Dick Cheney’s ultimate deception ~ which is his role in expediting the attacks against America on 9/11 and then utilizing torture to obtain so-called confessions to bolster the questionable 9/11 Commission findings.

Cheney knows the noose is closing and rightfully fears that he is being hung out to dry by Poppy Bush which explains G.W.’s silence while Cheney attempt to justify torture.

As the Daily Kos reported yesterday ~ ” Don’t be fooled, Dick and Liz aren’t fighting for the GOP nor for the Bush administration, they are fighting to keep Dick out of jail. Liz Cheney even, herself, admitted on CNN Anderson Cooper 360 that her father’s recent Media Tour was motivated by the fear to be prosecuted… Since Dubya is mum, I won’t be surprised that he threw Cheney under the bus a long time ago with the help of his Poppy.” {Here}

George W Bush, likely signed off on the 9/11 plot but was purposely kept somewhat out of the loop by Cheney ~ which explains his unconscious My Pet Goat Moment when informed of the attack ~ he was awaiting directions from Cheney.

Dick Cheney was in the bunker on 9-11 directing several “war games” and lied to 9-11 Omission Commission about the timing of his 9/11 activities and Donald Rumsfeld, a close friend of Cheney, was at Pentagon on 9-11 ~ and once slipped and said “when that missile hit the Pentagon”

But there are scores of other possible suspects in this conspiracy as seen in this graphic article ~ 9/11 Who Really Did It {Here}

It certainly appears that those who confessed to master minding the 9/11 attacks were also tortured ~ making their confessions highly suspect if not completely invalid along with the findings of the 9/11 Commission report. {Here}


So the obvious question is ~ Why Is President Obama not pushing the torture investigations ? The obvious answer is that Obama knows that any extensive torture investigation will lead to the so-called 9/11 confessions ( which were obtained under torture ) and open up a Pandora’s Box ~ which will virtually implicate the entire Cheney/Bush administration.

However, this is a fire that won’t go out as witnessed by John Hatch’s May 22nd article in ICH entitled Torture and 9/11.

Excerpt:

” The Iraq invasion was conceived long before 9/11 which was simply used as a pretext for achieving ‘full spectrum domination’ of land, sea, air, space, and cyberspace as outlined in The Project for a New American Century, of which Dick Cheney was a founding member, and President Bush a willing dupe.

The goal was nothing short of attempted world domination, and Iraq and Afghanistan were pawns on a list which included Syria and Iran. PNAC spoke longingly of a ‘new Pearl Harbor event’ as a catalyst to galvanize fearful American opinion to allow the former to have its way, which is exactly what happened after 9/11 (and don’t forget that mailed weaponized Lawrence Livermore anthrax, that ‘bonus terror’ that hurried the Patriot Act unread through Congress and that was since so conveniently blamed on a dead guy)

… An investigation would reveal (indeed we already know) that torture was employed to establish a false link between Saddam and al Qaeda in order to make a preconceived invasion more acceptable to the American people. (Lots of troops in Iraq still think that Saddam was responsible for 9/11, and still exact bloody revenge against innocent people.).. Since everything the people were told turned out to be lies, questions would inevitably arise regarding the ‘catalyst’ itself, the new Pearl Harbor 9/11 event that was so useful to PNAC and the Bush Administration… ”

Hatch concludes with this observation ~ ” This, I submit is what officials in the Obama Administration fear the most. An investigation of torture would inevitably lead to questions about what 9/11 was really about. We know with certainty that the official version of events is a pack of lies; what if America had to confront the fact that 9/11 really was an inside job? (The recent finding of nano-thermite in WTC dust is just one more compelling argument.)…Such a finding would so undermine Americans’ core beliefs as to have profoundly unpredictable consequences. It would mean that no American is safe from its own terrorist government. It would mean that government is not only corrupt to its very foundations, but also that it is a force of malevolence toward its citizens. It would mean that there is nothing in which to place one’s political faith. It would mean that the same forces that killed 3000 Americans on that day (and many subsequently) still operate behind the scenes in Washington, and ‘change’ is only cosmetic.

It would prove that over the last two terms, democracy was a cruel illusion in America (and some would say since November 22, 1963). It would mean that for the patriotic American citizen, at last there’s nothing left to lose… That’s what they’re ( Obama Administration ) are rightly afraid of … That’s why they want to allow the Bush putsch to get away with murder… and avoid looking further into the abyss.. “



But look into the abyss we must ~ for true transformation is never painless and must start with the truth and transparency ~ regardless of the consequences. We have a malignant cancer and it must be fully identified and isolated before it can be treated.It’s time for Congress to investigate the massive Iraq-Torture Scandal ~ and for the Department of Justice to prosecute Dick Cheney for creating it. {source}

Bush and Cheney did not testify before the 9/11 commission. They were not under oath and there was no recording made of the session nor a stenographer in the room.

It was their way of making sure that there were no conflicting statements and that no perjury charges could ever come out of it.

The White House fired back at Cheney today. Now there’s a small war of words on who’s torturing and killing is the most effective.

Make no mistake, Obama, Cheney…they are on the same side. They work for the same bankers, the same corporations and the same foreign interests.

These criminals will try their best to never let one of their own take a fall. It could start a domino effect that leads them all to the gallows.

The Science of 9/11 – Explosive Images

Posted on

https://i0.wp.com/www.scienceof911.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/tower_exploding_2730.jpg 

The horizontal reach of the debris is remarkable.

The direction of this dust indicates that the steel has been projected both outwards and upwards.

The question asked there was: is this the concrete? There was of course a lot of concrete in the buildings, about 100 acres, 4 inches thick, in each tower, and it had to go somewhere, as very little can be found in photographs of the base of the towers after collapse. One has to ask why a building falling due to gravity would pulverize so much concrete so finely as to turn most of it into dust.

More – The Science of 9/11 – Images

Home page – The Science of 9/11

Independent Investigation Into Pentagon Attack Yields Alarming Information

Posted on

August 30th, 2009
PRLog


Witness flight path vs official flight path

Researchers present new eyewitness testimony which they say proves the government’s story to be a “monstrous lie”

A three year independent investigation into the September 11, 2001 attack on the Pentagon has yielded new eyewitness evidence which, according to the Southern California-based researchers who conducted the investigation, “conclusively (and unfortunately) establishes as a historical fact that the violence which took place in Arlington that day was not the result of a surprise attack by suicide hijackers, but rather a military black operation involving a carefully planned and skillfully executed deception.”


They have compiled the most pertinent testimony into an 81 minute video presentation entitled National Security Alert, which has earned the respect and praise of a growing number of distinguished academics, journalists, writers, entertainers, pilots, and military personnel.

The investigation involved multiple trips to the scene of the crime in Arlington, Virginia, close scrutiny of all official and unofficial data related to the event, and, most importantly, first-person interviews with dozens of eyewitnesses, many of which were conducted and filmed in the exact locations from which they witnessed the plane that allegedly struck the building that day. It was primarily conducted by two men named Craig Ranke and Aldo Marquis, also known as Citizen Investigation Team, or CIT.

“There were a growing number of people in the United States and around the world who were suspicious of the government’s story about what had happened at the Pentagon that day,” Ranke explains. “The doubts were initially fueled by the dubious damage to the building, which seemed incompatible with a 757 crash, the deliberate lack of transparency by the authorities, and many other issues, but they really intensified after a team of professional pilots (Pilots for 9/11 Truth) analyzed the data obtained from the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) via a Freedom of Information Act request in 2006, which was supposedly from the black box of American Airlines Flight 77, and found that the last reported altitude of the plane was far too high to have struck the light poles or the building. This meant that either the plane did not cause the observed physical damage, that the government had released fraudulent data, or both.”

“We were tired of the cover-up, but we were also frustrated with the dead-end theorizing that was taking place”, says Marquis of the project’s genesis. “We knew that the only way we were ever going to know what had really happened was if we actually went to the area, knocked on doors, and interviewed everyday people about what they saw.”

When these eyewitness accounts are aggregated, they paint a very disturbing picture, say the researchers.

“To put it as concisely as possible, the plane had to have flown on a very specific flight path in the final seconds before it reached the Pentagon in order to have caused the observed damage, starting with the light poles that were photographed on the ground and ending with the directional damage to the building itself which was outlined in detail by the American Society of Civil Engineers,” explains Ranke. “The government claims the plane flew on this flight path and hit the building. The eyewitnesses in all of the most critical vantage points, on the other hand, independently, unanimously, and unequivocally report a drastically different flight path, proving that the plane absolutely could not have hit the light poles or the building. It is a non-controversial scientific fact that a strike from this trajectory would have caused a very different damage path.”

It wasn’t just witnesses who watched the plane approach the building that the team spoke with, however.

“We’ve also published our interview with a Pentagon police officer who saw the plane flying away from the Pentagon immediately after the explosion”, says Marquis. “We already knew that the plane could not have hit based on the testimony of the witnesses on the other side of the building who watched it approach, but it was still vindicating to get this kind of confirmation.”

A 2006 Scripps Howard/Ohio University poll found that “More than a third of the American public suspects that federal officials assisted in the 9/11 terrorist attacks or took no action to stop them so the United States could go to war in the Middle East.” Nevertheless, Ranke and Marquis acknowledge it is still quite controversial to claim, as they do, that “criminal elements within the U.S. government” were complicit in the attacks.

“If you are skeptical of (or even incensed by) this statement we do not blame you,” reads a note on the front page of their website, CitizenInvestigationTeam.com. “We are not asking you to take our word for it, nor do we want you to do that. We want you to view the evidence and see with your own eyes that this is the case. We want you to hear it directly from the eyewitnesses who were there, just as we did.”

Many people seem to be taking them up on this offer. Their video has already received almost 70,000 views online since it was first posted to their website a few weeks ago with only a grass roots promotional effort behind it.

Perhaps more notable than the size of the audience, however, is the caliber of some of the people in it. A newly-published compendium of endorsements on the CitizenInvestigationTeam.com website includes praise from a wide array of distinguished and well-respected Americans.

Emmy-award winning actor and former president of The Screen actors Guild, Ed Asner, calls the film a “reasoned, and methodical look at witness testimony the day the Pentagon was attacked on Sept. 11th”.

Prolific non-ficition author Dr. Peter Dale Scott, Professor Emeritus of the University of California, Berkeley affirms that the film “successfully rebuts the official account of Flight 77’s flight path on 9/11 as it approached the Pentagon”.

“If you accept the placement of the plane as independently and unanimously reported by the witnesses presented in CIT’s video National Security Alert, science proves that it did not cause the physical damage at the Pentagon on 9/11/2001”, says FAA certified pilot Robert Balsamo.

Dr. David Ray Griffin, author of The New Pearl Harbor Revisited: 9/11, the Cover-Up, and the Exposé and many other titles, says he is “pleased to be able to recommend this important film with enthusiasm”, while scholar, author, and radio host Dr. Kevin Barrett says that the film proves “that the official version of the attack on the Pentagon is false, and that the attack must have been a deceptive military operation, not the kamakaze crash of a hijacked commercial jet.”

Scott McKinsey, an award-winning network television director, says “The DVD offers no theorizing or speculation; only corroborated eyewitness evidence contradicting the official flight data to support an overwhelming argument that a plane did not slam into the Pentagon on 9/11”.

Architect Richard Gage, AIA, founder of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth (AE911Truth.org), a coalition of over 700 professional architects and engineers calling for a new independent investigation of the destruction of the three skyscrapers in New York on 9/11 (the third was World Trade Center 7), calls the film “long overdue, but worth waiting for” and says that it “deserves serious attention”.

Retired Navy Commander and aviator James R. Compton calls National Security Alert “the best reporting I’ve seen in a long, long time” and “a must see for every citizen in our country”.

“Government and media figures who dare ignore evidence this conclusive do so at their own peril”, warns Lt. Col. Shelton Lankford, a retired Marine pilot who has flown 303 combat missions.

The full quotes from these individuals and others can be read at here.

National Security Alert can be viewed for free online here.

-###-

PRLog http://www.prlog.org:80/10322926-independent-investigation-into-pentagon-attack-yields-alarming-information.html – We are an organization of independent citizens who have embarked on a guerrilla reporting effort to get to the bottom of the truth behind the 9/11 attack on the Pentagon.

Source: The Peoples Voice

US Soldiers Find Themselves Being Terrorists in Afghanistan

Posted on

As the US continues to step up war efforts in Afghanistan, the number of American soldiers refusing deployment to war zones is also increasing. Author and Independent Journalist Dahr Jamail tells RT that U.S. soldiers in combat zones find themselves being terrorists.

Only a few seem to care.

9/11…Day of Service?

Posted on

After almost 8 years of scaremongering and wars based on the lies of ‘who did 9/11,’ we now have an attempt to morph September 11 into a faux day of service.

Service for whom?

For those who wish to continue the cover-up and save their own skins?

The greatest service would be to bring justice not only to the victims of  9/11 but for those who have died in vain for the profiteers of war. Wars that have nothing to do with 9/11 except as the catalyst for American and Israeli imperialism and the bankers and the war machine money schemes.

Left/right, Obama/Bush…there’s not a difference when it comes to diverting the truth. All are guilty of murder by association by trying to perpetuate the ‘official’ story.

The only day of service that would mean anything would be the day that those within our own corrupt government, past and present, and their allies responsible for the crimes of 9/11 are imprisoned or executed. 

We won’t forget and we won’t observe this September 11th as a diversionary ‘day of service’ just because a cabal of criminals and their useful idiots want us to.

The truth of 9/11 is the only ‘service’ worth considering.