Month: December 2012

Trust Your Government

Posted on Updated on

Trust Dianne Feinstein? Yeah right.

From my perspective, all of the many arguments for gun control come down to one thing…
‘trust your government.’

That is about the most absurd thing anyone could imply.

If we wanted to, we could go back just 100 years to the illegal founding of the Federal Reserve, continue on up to today and make a list of a hundred, a thousand reasons not to trust our government and every one of them grounded in fact.

The list would be redundant. The reasons are not new. Governments repeatedly abuse what little trust the average person may have for them using the same motives and techniques. There’s nothing new under the sun certainly applies.

What’s strange in this gun control issue is that it aligns us with folks whose ideas we don’t care for that much. Warmongers, Muslim haters, religious fanatics, tea party dupes and drug war warriors are just a few. They will slap us on the back saying ‘from my cold dead hands’ over and over and ‘yeah, we are brothers in arms brother.’ Sometimes I guess we take our allies where we may find them.

I fully expect the neocons and neolibs, the fake righties and the fake progressives will come together in ‘compromise’ and once again trash the already almost burned up Constitution. It is what their handlers want and few will dare to risk their wrath. 

The below video has surely pissed off more than a few who would rather the information not be widely known regarding how jewish/zionist politicians have long led the gun control charge. It is the words of Curt Maynard who you may remember died by the gun in circumstances that will never be fully known.

Advertisements

A Three-Peat?

Posted on Updated on

Sandy Hook,

Webster, New York

and…..

small children,

firefighters

and…..

Could we be in for a ‘three-peat’ this holiday season? Would it be surprising? We hope this is idle speculation. Leaving aside previous mass shooting events before Sandy Hook, a third one similar to Newtown and Webster before the end of the year would again solidify the talking points of a long simmering agenda now coming to a boiling point as Congress reconvenes. You can hear it now – three… the third… three… the third. Repeated ad nauseam with accompanying horror.

The number three often has significance, hidden meanings and may call into play archetypes which elicit emotions. 

The meme must be reinforced. Upscale, white, legal and illegal accessibility to semi-automatic ‘assault’ rifles,’ the mentally disturbed, unpredictable, etc., etc., etc. 

At a family gathering yesterday, I did not bring up any political issues but did weigh in when others did. Some in the family were strongly encouraging me to keep my thoughts, even if correct, to myself and especially not to put them in writing on the internet. It’s dangerous they said. Be voluntarily silent. No questions. It’s for your own good. One even went so far as to use an old cliche…’Silence is Golden.’
That type of thinking is exactly what the powers that be want.

We can almost hear the rallying cry of those whose vested interests are in extreme profit and extreme power…’Violence is Golden.’

It is a sad situation that we would even feel the need to indulge in the macabre speculations of  ‘what may come next.’ Still, some of us think it is a much needed exercise. False flags, staged events and psyops are the roller coaster ride we’re on.

“When you’re at the top of a roller coaster, SHIT JUST GOT REAL!”
                quote from an unknown

Our First Myth

Posted on Updated on

As a whole, our first myth was Santa Claus. It was relatively benign and usually fun for the whole family.

It was also a sign of things to come.


The conversation that never happened.

“Mama and daddy, why did you tell me Santa was real when he’s not?”

“Well son, it was what was expected of us. Everyone does it. We would have been portrayed as very odd if we didn’t, as if that really mattered, and you would have missed out on an entertaining part of your childhood.”

“But wasn’t it a lie and you always said you would never lie to me?”

“Yes, I guess you could say it was but it was not in mean way and now that you are older we can use the myth of Santa as a learning tool and as a warning of other myths that will try and dominate your life from now on.”

“I don’t understand.”

“You will as you get older. Myths will be used to get you you think in certain ways, to act and react in ways contrary to your best interests, to believe in things because others want you to, not because they are real but to control you. It will be much like the threat of Santa not coming with presents if you were naughty and not nice.”

“I still don’t understand.”

“There will be the myths of religion, politics, war, history, economics and a thousand other things and they will creep into your education and life until it’s hard to figure out what’s reality and what’s not. Maybe you will learn to ask the question “Is this another Santa myth?””

“OK daddy, will you help me?”

“Yes son, we will work through all of this together to the best of our ability. I love you.”

“I love you too daddy.”

Merry Christmas to everyone. May you have a safe and happy holiday.

While We Were at the Movies

Posted on Updated on

Whatever one may think actually happened at Sandy Hook™ it offered the opportunity to divert our attention away from other things of  ‘importance.’


U.N. announces $1.5 billion aid effort for Syrian refugees. Much of it will be our money and you know what? Without the US and NATO backed mercenaries tearing the country apart, there would be no refugees. ‘Rebels’ take some time for photo ops, no questions about 2nd Amendment rights there, and Putin says “We are not concerned with the fate of Assad’s regime.”

Speaking of Putin. For those who are questioning his RT channel, Paul Craig Roberts did an interview with them and wondered why they too are focused on ‘assault weapons’ and not discrepancies in the Sandy Hook™ official story just the same as our media is.

“It seems odd, however, that RT Moscow would uncritically follow the US media in reporting the official story after experiencing, for example, the US media’s intentional misreporting of the Georgian-Russian war, which was started by the former Soviet republic of Georgia but blamed on Russia. Does RT Moscow really believe the US media that the US missile bases surrounding Russia are directed at Iran?”

The Chinese also want Americans disarmed.

 The Chinese government stated, “Their blood and tears demand no delay for the U.S. gun control.”

Gun control is a sideshow. The main act in this circus is perpetual fear resulting in people rolling over and playing dead right before they are.

Poor Hillary. Her head hurts, brain scrambled, hard to talk. Gives time for scriptwriters to come up with something, anything. Her aides are jumping ship. It’s like watching Lethal Weapon XXXIII, the plot is thin and Mel Gibson and Danny Glover just don’t have their hearts in it.

Obama tells Joe Biden to push, push, push. The baby will come out faster that way. “I am a zionist” Joe will meet with law enforcement officers from around the country, many of them already trained by Israeli security. The Israelization of America marches on.

What? Israel broke laws of war by attacking journalists and media facilities in Gaza during the November 2012 fighting and this is just now news?  “Journalists and media workers are civilians and therefore immune from attack?” There’s no vaccinations available to get that immunity.

While on the subject of vaccinations, a confidential GlaxoSmithKline document recently leaked to the press exposed that within a two-year period, a total of 36 infants died after receiving the 6-in-1 vaccine, Infanrix Hexa. Also, five out of 65 babies in Chau Quang commune in Vietnam died from unknown causes 2-10 days after they were vaccinated against hepatitis B.  Shhh, don’t let this get out. Some pharma exec’s Christmas bonus may be put in jeopardy.


Another day, another bank fine. UBS agrees to pay $1.5 billion in the LIBOR interest rigging scam.
Two senior UBS traders criminally charged in U.S. Whatever happened to ‘too big to jail.?’ I’m hedging my bets they will ever spend much time behind bars. Just how much did they actually steal in this game? 

I can’t find where there has been any little children killed by drones in Pakistan or Afghanistan over the last week. Did the drone jockeys go on vacation, on strike or hiding in mourning? Don’t worry, they’ll be back.

 

 
‘Plan B’ from Outer Space. Or was it Plan 9? Oh, apologies to Ed Wood. His movie made more sense than the one playing in Congress. 

Off the ‘fiscal cliff.’ No seat belt required. 







Hot on the heels of her latest and  fabulous “Zero Dark Thirty,” Kathryn Bigelow is rumored to be in the mix for the rights to Sandy Hook The Movie. She is reportedly demanding full access to FBI, CIA and Mossad files and personnel just so she can get the story straight. Can’t have a movie filled with lies, now can we?

You probably know some stories more important than these that have been somewhat hidden since we turned our focus to Sandy Hook™. Let us know what they are. It’s not easy living like a mushroom in the dark back of the theater. 

You Are What You Buy…and Buy Into

Posted on

There’s an old marketing idea that in order to sell us things we don’t need a connection to our identity must be created. If that connection can be made, subliminally or overtly and of course through manufactured peer pressure, almost anything can be sold to the consumerist masses.

It’s the same with what we buy into regarding politics and current events. Propaganda depends on us identifying with certain concepts, making them a part of our thought process and even urging others to think like we do. We feel most comfortable when we have a support group that we can identify with and it matters little whether the solidarity is based on lies.  This applies to some but not all.

When it comes to events that have political, societal, and cultural implications, some of us twitch and scream at what we are being told by the engineers of deception. We don’t believe a damn thing they say. That’s normal for us and we identify with others who see through the lies. We may not agree on all points but that’s to be expected.

We are conspiracists for lack of a better term. Not necessarily because we want to be but because we have to be. Somebody has to do it. We take what the government and media say and shout NO. We counter with conspiracies and speculations and take them sometimes to the outer limits. We also pull back from the extremes when facts come to life but real facts are problematic. Inundated with disinformation and diversion from all angles we find facts elusive. For every person who is behind a crime of national importance there are many many more who exist only to provide cover for what they have done.

Daring to actually speak of conspiracies, especially in traumatic events, we find ourselves ostracized and called names. Our mental state is called into question. Our motives seen as nothing more than crazy. Our intentions said to be divisive.

So what’s a poor boy or girl to do?

From JFK to Oklahoma City to 9/11 and beyond, at least we’ve tried to be consistent.  Not always right but certainly not always wrong.

We don’t have to follow the Buyers Road or the Sellers Lane. There’s this path to truth I’ve heard about. It’s hard to find but it’s not impossible.

Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn speaks to us

Posted on

I asked Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn what he thought about some of the issues of our day – gun control, war, the jewish question, human rights…

He didn’t say much but pointed me to some of his writings.

“And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if every Security I operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his family? Or if, during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand?… The Organs would very quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and, notwithstanding all of Stalin’s thirst, the cursed machine would have ground to a halt! If…if…We didn’t love freedom enough. And even more – we had no awareness of the real situation…. We purely and simply deserved everything that happened afterward.”

If I were asked today to formulate as concisely as possible that main cause of the ruinous revolution that swallowed up some 60 million of our people, I could not put it more accurately than to repeat: ‘Men had forgotten God; that is why all this has happened.”

“Patriotism means unqualified and unwavering love for the nation, which implies not uncritical eagerness to serve, not support for unjust claims, but frank assessment of its vices and sins, and penitence for them.”


“For a country to have a great writer is like having another government. That’s why no regime has ever loved great writers, only minor ones.”

The one good thing about repeating your mistakes is that you know when to cringe”

“A state of war only serves as an excuse for domestic tyranny.”
 

“In our country the lie has become not just a moral category but a pillar of the State.”

“War is the price we pay for living in a state. Before you can abolish war you will have to abolish all states. But that is unthinkable until the propensity to violence and evil is rooted out of human beings. The state was created to protect us from evil. In ordinary life thousands of bad impulses, from a thousand foci of evil, move chaotically, randomly, against the vulnerable. The state is called upon to check these impulses — but it generates others of its own, still more powerful, and this time one-directional. At times it throws them all in a single direction — and that is war.”


“You only have power over people so long as you don’t take everything away from them. But when you’ve robbed a man of everything he’s no longer in your power — he’s free again.”

“Violence, less and less embarrassed by the limits imposed by centuries of lawfulness, is brazenly and victoriously striding across the whole world, unconcerned that its infertility has been demonstrated and proved many times in history. What is more, it is not simply crude power that triumphs abroad, but its exultant justification. The world is being inundated by the brazen conviction that power can do anything, justice nothing.”

“Violence can only be concealed by a lie, and the lie can only be maintained by violence. Any man who has once proclaimed violence as his method is inevitably forced to take the lie as his principle.”

“Without any censorship, in the West fashionable trends of thought and ideas are carefully separated from those which are not fashionable; nothing is forbidden, but what is not fashionable will hardly ever find its way into periodicals or books or be heard in colleges. Legally your researchers are free, but they are conditioned by the fashion of the day.  There is a dangerous tendency to form a herd, shutting off successful development.”

____________
 

Alexander Solzhenitsyn on ‘The Protocols of the Elders of Zion”
 
The Elders of Zion and the Masters Discourse


By Israel Shamir

…The Anonymous author of the Protocols describes a master-plan for vast restructuring of society, creation of a new oligarchy and subjugation of millions. The final product is not too different from the one described in a contemporary piece of writing, The Iron Heel by Jack London, the great radical from Oakland, California. However, London expected harsh cracking down, while Anonym’s way to subjugation leads through Machiavellian manipulations and mind control a la Orwell’s 1984. (Orwell’s homage to the Protocols is even more striking as it is rarely noticed).

The difficulty of the Protocols is in an uncanny dissonance between its uncouth language and deep social and religious thought. It is a rude parody-like rendering of a satanic, subtle and well-thought out plan, wrote the Nobel Prise winning novelist Alexander Solzhenitsyn[5] in his (written in 1966 and published in 2001) analysis of the Protocols.

“The Protocols … show a blueprint of a social system. Its design is well above abilities of an ordinary mind, including that of its publisher. It is a dynamic process of two stages, of destabilization, increasing freedom and liberalism, which is terminated in social cataclysm, and on the second stage, new hierarchical restructuring of society takes place. It is more complicated than a nuclear bomb. It could be a stolen and distorted plan designed by a mind of genius. Its putrid style of an anti-Semitic grubby brochure [intentionally] obscures the great strength of thought and insight”.

Solzhenitsyn is aware of faults of the Protocols. “Its style is that of a filthy leaflet, the powerful line of thought is broken and fragmented, mixed up with ill-smelling incantations and psychological blunders. The system described is not necessarily connected with the Jews; it could be purely Masonic or whatever; while its strongly anti-Semitic current is not an organic part of the design”.

Solzhenitsyn makes a textual experiment, removes words “Jews”, “Goyim” and “conspiracy” and finds many disturbing ideas. He concludes: “The text demonstrates impressive foresight on the two systems of society, the Western and the Soviet one. While a strong thinker could possibly predict the development of the West in 1901, how could he grasp the Soviet future?”

Solzhenitsyn braved the Soviet regime, dared to write and publish the mammoth Archipelago Gulag, an indictment of the Soviet repression, but even he stalled and did not publish his research of the Protocols. He asked it to be published after his death only, and it was printed against his will in a very small number of copies in 2001. Let us follow Solzhenitsyn’s line of thought and gaze into the crystal ball of the Protocols, while temporarily discounting its “Jewish line” and paying heed to the idea of creating a new system, not necessarily a Jewish-dominated one. The master-plan begins with reshaping of human mind:

“People’s minds should be diverted (away from contemplation) towards industry and trade, and then they will have no time to think. The people will be consumed by the pursuit of gain. It will be vain pursuit, for we shall put industry on a speculative basis: what is withdrawn from the land by industry will slip through the hands of workers and industrialists and pass into the hands of financiers.

The intensified struggle for survival and superiority, accompanied by crises and shocks will create cold and heartless communities with strong aversion towards religion. Their only guide is gain that is Mammon, which they will erect into a veritable cult”.

Foresight of Anonym is amazing: in the days of the Protocols’ publication, Man was still the measure of things, and full eighty years would pass, until Milton Friedman and Chicago School would proclaim Market and Profit as the only guiding light.

The tool for enslavement of minds is the media, writes Anonym. “There is a great force that creates the movement of thought in the people, and that is the media. It is in the media that the triumph of freedom of speech finds its incarnation. Through the Press we have gained the power to influence minds while remaining unobserved. We shall erase from the memory of men the historical facts we do not want them to know, and leave only those we wish”…

The Protocols identify the moving force of the New World Order with a powerful group of extremely chauvinist, manipulative and domination-obsessed Jewish leaders. The leaders, according to the Protocols, despise ordinary community members; they utilise and support anti-Semitism as the means to keep their “lesser brethren”, innocent ordinary folk of Jewish origin, in thrall to their rule. The leaders are described as pathological goy haters, bent on destroying culture and traditions of other nations while preserving their own. Their goal is to create world government and rule the homogenised and globalised world.

Their aims and intentions are stated in extremely contrarian and obnoxious way. Solzhenitsyn concluded that no sane person would deliver his favourite ideas in such self-demeaning and self-defeating way. “We extract gold from their blood and tears”, “our power is based on workers’ hunger”, “revolutionaries are our human tools”, “brutish minds of Goyim” are, in his opinion, words ascribed to the Jews by their enemies. A Jew would rather put such ideas in an oblique way, he felt…

Solzhenitsyn does not believe in existence of the Elders of Zion, though “the togetherness and coordination of Jewish activity for the sake of their advancement caused many writers (beginning from Cicero) to imagine there is a single commanding centre to direct their attacks”. “Without such a world centre, without conspiring, the Jews understand each other and are able to coordinate their actions”…

Self-interest explains the Jewish involvement with the dreaded Cheka, the Soviet security services. Until 1937, the Jews occupied the top echelon of the KGB predecessor body, while millions of Russians lost their life or liberty. Objectively, these executioners made jobs and houses available for their fellow Jews. After the massacre and exile of Russian elites, the Jews were ready for equality, as a son of a Rabbi could easily compete with a son of Russian worker or peasant, though he wouldn’t be able to compete with a son of Russian noble.

In a similar way, the Jews in Israel granted limited equality to the Palestinians in 1966, after confiscation of 90% of native lands and expulsion of 90% of natives. Now, the settlers promise to extend equality to the rest of Palestinians, after they will expel the majority of them elsewhere. In the light of great Jewish support for Israel, there is no reason to presume that the Jewish modus operandi in Palestine is intrinsically different from the Jewish intentions abroad.

Solzhenitsyn writes: “Executed army officers were Russians, the noblemen, priests, monks, deputies were Russians… In 1920s, the pre-revolutionary engineers and scientists were exiled or killed. They were Russians, while their place was taken by Jews. The best Russian Psychiatric institute in Moscow, its Russian members were arrested or exiled, while their place was taken by the Jews. Important Jewish doctors blocked the advancement of Russian medical scientists… The best intellectual and artistic elites of Russian people were killed, while the Jews grew and flourished in these (deadly for Russians) years”

Two Hundred Years Together was written by Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, the famous Russian dissident who won a Nobel Prize for Literature. It is about the time of the Russians and the Jews inside the empire. He wrote in Russian of course but various publishers decided they were not going to put out an English version because they were Jews or frightened of them.

The together of the title refers to Russians and Jews. The first volume was Russian-Jewish History 1795-1916. The second was called The Jews in the Soviet Union. So it is clear enough why the Jews were never going to like what he had to say.

Alexander Solzhenitsyn and the Jews.  Alexandr Solzhenitsyn was the famous Russian dissident. Then he stopped being famous and now he is a non-person. It happened because he told the truth about the Jews in Russia. So the Jews in the media wrote him out of history. He disappeared just like those people that Stalin did not like. His book was not published in English but now a private venture is doing what it takes. So now read for yourself, think for yourself, decide for yourself.

Solzhenitsyn breaks last taboo of the revolution

____________

Invitation to a Gulag…

Speculation but who knows?
 
GUN CONTROL: Here is how it will go down 

Gun Control Strategy: An outright gun ban is unlikely given the constitutional constraints; therefore, an incremental (frog in the pot) approach is more probable. First, the Assault Weapon Ban (specific guns by make and type, and high cap mags) Part Deux for the new manufacture, importation and possession of same (no sunset). Then legislation that all weapons that were exempt or grandfathered (all semi-auto firearms) be “registered” with local law enforcement including your fingerprints. Then, the BATF will make a ruling that all exempt “assault” styled weapons that were grandfathered are subject to Title II of the 1968 Gun Control Act and that all have to either be registered or turned in and no transfers are allowed without BATF approval and the payment of a transfer tax (same as for fully automatic weapons (“machine guns”) and “destructive devices”. In addition they will add a few “sniper” style rifles to the list and require special forms and ID to buy “military or law enforcement” calibre ammunition: that covers 9mm, .40 sw, .45, 5.56/.223, 6.8mm, 7.62×51/.308, .300 WM, .338 Lapua, .416 Chey Tac and .50 bmg. Then the Executive Branch (President with DHS and BATF) will issue an edict that all semi-automatic handguns be registered with local law enforcement (the same as previously with assault style rifles) presumably to lessen resistance to a federal gun grab by deferring it to the local LE.

Once the above legislative and executive order gun control (restriction and registration) is in place….then the collection comes. At this point the State Dept will agree to the UN Small Arms Treaty and be ramroded thru the Senate for confirmation. THEN the convenient crisis or disaster (false flag operation or inevitable chaos from imbedded terror cells, etc) which will lead to a declaration of Martial Law. At this point road blocks will be set up and all guns required to be turned in within 30 days or face a 10 year prison sentence and a $250,000 fine. Roadblocks will be set up and those with CCW permits will be known to authorities thru license plate readers and computer interface and those carrying drivers will be picked up. Then they will commence the collection process aided by UN Troops to assist and facilitate the search for weapons not turned in during the 30 day amnesty period. Those found with illegal weapons and ammunition will be rounded up for detention and reeducation camps.

On the one hand I am reluctant to give them a “blueprint” for registration and confiscation but then again this has been planned for decades (going back to the 1960s in UN General Disarmament white papers). If one has their blueprint then concerned citizens and legal staffs of the NRA and GOA can prepare defenses and counter strategies. Bottom line: general population disarmament precedes a police state and potential genocide of those targeted by the power structure. 

Bloomberg ‘demands’ the first part of the above scenario.

The mayor said federal lawmakers need to pass three pieces of legislation — the requirement that all private sales of guns include background checks, bans on owning military-style assault weapons and high-capacity magazines and making gun trafficking a felony offense.

Here’s some more to look forward to…from a ‘government is good’ shill

Crazy people are not allowed to own weapons. Anyone who owns a firearm in America must have, at their own expense, a complete psychiatric evaluation performed annually. {By government doctors who will have an eye on those who ask the big questions? Drug tests? By drugging those who fail the ‘evaluation’ with pharma approved poisons?}

We need to triple the federal excise tax on weapons and ammunition, collected at the point of manufacture or import like a VAT or tarriff.

Raise it up to 30%. Before guns or ammunition ever leaves the factory, the federal government needs to start collecting money for the costly externalities that result from mass gun ownership.

Gun owners must accept less civil rights than non owners.

Sorry to say for my fellow gun owners, but if you want to have the power of life and death at the ready, you’re going to have to accept some regulations on your behavior. Government should be be able to search your home without a warrant if you keep a high powered assault rifle or other high powered firearms. I’d have no problem if an agent of the NYPD or the ATF wanted to come in and check on my weapons stash. If I don’t like it, I’ll just get rid of them. But I wont because I’m not a crazy person and I understand why the state would like to know whats going on with me and my weapons.

As a non-violent person and not at all a ‘gun nut,’ I reject all limitations on our civil rights. An unarmed society means slavery and quite possibly genocide. Just ask Aleksandr. More false flags to speed up the process coming soon.

The Strategy of Tension

Posted on Updated on

Operation Gladio never ended. It just moved around, changed names and adjusted motives and techniques.

In light of the recent Gladio style mass shootings, here’s a short background.

Operation Gladio is undisputed historical fact. Gladio was part of a post-World War II program set up by the CIA and NATO supposedly to thwart future Soviet/communist invasions or influence in Italy and Western Europe. In fact, it became a state-sponsored right-wing terrorist network, involved in false flag operations and the subversion of democracy.

The existence of Gladio was confirmed and admitted by the Italian government in 1990, after a judge, Felice Casson, discovered the network in the course of his investigations into right-wing terrorism. Italian prime minister Giulio Andreotti admitted Gladio’s existence but tried to minimize its significance.

The main function of the Gladio-style groups, in the absence of Soviet invasion, seems to have been to discredit left-wing groups and politicians through the use of “the strategy of tension,” including false-flag terrorism. The strategy of tension is a concept for control and manipulation of public opinion through the use of fear, propaganda, agents provacateurs, terrorism, etc. The aim was to instill fear into the populace while framing communist and left-wing political opponents for terrorist atrocities. more

‘You had to attack civilians, the people, women, children, innocent people, unknown people far removed from any political game. The reason was quite simple: to force … the public to turn to the state to ask for greater security.”

Perhaps it’s just a coincidence. But the U.S. elite’s history of directing and fomenting terrorist attacks against friendly populations is so extensive — indeed, so ingrained and accepted — that it calls into question the origin of every terrorist act that roils the world. With each fresh atrocity, we’re forced to ask: Was it the work of “genuine” terrorists or a “black op” by intelligence agencies — or both?

While not infallible, the ancient Latin question is still the best guide to penetrating the bloody murk of modern terrorism: Cui bono? Who benefits? Whose powers and policies are enhanced by the attack? For it is indisputable that the “strategy of tension” means power and profit for those who claim to possess the key to “security.” And from the halls of the Kremlin to the banks of the Potomac, this cynical strategy is the ruling ideology of our times. more

The swiftness with which the fear of Communism has since been transmuted following the end of the Cold War into a fear of Islamic terrorism, along with the arrival of the whole security-military- industrial-complex paraphernalia of the ‘War on Terror’ illustrates that this is almost a modus operandi of military planners. It’s as if they can’t help themselves. In light of this information, there is now a vast army of people around the world who reject the official government narrative of what happened on 9/11 and suspect there may have been US government complicity in the attacks. Opponents cry out that such a thing is unthinkable and that ‘they’ would never do such a thing. But as Ganser’s meticulously footnoted history of the Gladio armies makes clear: it may be unthinkable but it certainly isn’t unprecedented. more

One of the propaganda hooks going around is that the Connecticut school shooting is a “Black Swan” event. Who could ever have predicted it? Those aware of history maybe?

It was odd that right before the latest shooting there was an old story being promoted on how military doctors tested the effects of nerve gas, LSD and other drugs on 5,000 U.S. soldiers to gauge the effects on their brain and behavior.  These experiments were not just for chemical warfare but for mind control purposes which we have to guess is still going on to this day, much refined and tested as only an unlimited supply of money can do. 

The Strategy of Tension today often depends on patsies…mind controlled to one extent or another, unknowing, through drugs, suggestion, possibly microwave or some sort of electromagnetic manipulation…always there’s the element of ignorance or just downright stupidity. Ask the FBI. They find them and use them all the time in their fake domestic ‘war on terror.’

Under the provisions of the National Security Act of 1947, the CIA was established. One of the main areas investigated by the CIA was mind control. The behavior control program was motivated by Soviet, Chinese, and North Korean use of mind control techniques. The CIA originated its first program in 1950 under the name BLUEBIRD. MKULTRA officially began in 1953. In 1973, tipped off about forthcoming investigations, CIA Director Richard Helms ordered the destruction of any MKULTRA records. 

The Senate Intelligence Committee did find some records during its investigation in 1976. Senator Frank Church, who led the congressional investigations of the CIA’s unlawful actions, said that the agency was “a rogue elephant” operating above the law as it plotted assassinations, illegally spied on thousands of Americans, and even drugged citizens in its effort to develop new weapons for its covert arsenal. In 1977, through a Freedom of Information Act request, 16,000 pages of mind control documents were found as part of the Agency’s financial history.

MKULTRA grew into a mammoth undertaking. The nature of the research included these specific problems.

Can we create by post-H (hypnotic) control an action contrary to an individual’s basic moral principles?  

Can we “alter” a person’s personality? Can we guarantee total amnesia under any and all conditions?  

Could we seize a subject and in the space of an hour by post-H control have him crash an airplane?  

Can we devise a system for making unwilling subjects into willing agents and then transfer that control to untrained agency agents in the field by use of codes or identifying signs?

The focal point of MKULTRA was the use of humans as unwitting subjects [without their knowledge or consent]. The CIA sponsored numerous experiments of this kind. Regardless of a report by the CIA’s Inspector General in 1963 recommending the termination of testing on unwitting subjects, future CIA Director Richard Helms continued to advocate covert testing on the grounds that “we are less capable of staying up with the Soviet advances in this field.” On the subject of moral issues, Helms commented, “we have no answer to the moral issue.”

In the second half of the 20th century, mind control projects resulted in extensive political abuse of psychiatry. Many thousands were subjected to unethical mind control experiments by leading psychiatrists and medical schools. Mind control experimentation was not only tolerated by medical professionals, but published in psychiatric and medical journals. Dr. William Sweet participated in both brain electrode implant experiments and the injection of uranium into medical patients at Harvard University. Army doctors were involved in LSD testing at least until the late 1970’s. Subjects of LSD experiments included children as young as five years old, and brain electrodes were implanted in children as young as 11 years of age. more

Killing first graders to further the ‘strategy of tension’ seems plausible to me. It has a history and many years of refinement behind it. Even if this time wasn’t a false flag, it doesn’t mean the next one won’t be.