communism

Capitalism and Leninism/Communism are two arms of the same beast.

Posted on

“Capitalism is not ‘free enterprise,’ an incentive for success, ‘a chance for all.’ Capitalism is trusts, speculation, parasitical usury. Capitalism is J. P. Morgan, Rothschild’s bank, ripping apart the nations like maddened swine. Capitalism is the jewish frying pan in which culture is rendered down to the grease of money.” William Striker

Revolution/change is not always what it seems at first. Just ask the Russians. This time the genocide may be here.

I heard a couple of local farmers here lately call our government ‘communist.’

More people are catching on that things are getting out of hand, but are they willing to do anything about it?

https://i1.wp.com/www.pflp.ps/english/files/images/obama-israeli-flag.jpg Zionism, communism and capitalism are intimately intertwined. History repeats if we let it.

History Lesson for Today: The Capitalist-Communist Connection

Posted on

https://i1.wp.com/www.ucc.ie/acad/appsoc/tmp_store/mia/Library/archive/trotsky/works/t1919f.jpg

By Matthew D. Jarvie

SovereignSentience.blogspot.com

Excerpt from a 1980 interview with Professor Antony C. Sutton, highlighting the capitalist-communist connection.

From Sutton’s book ‘Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution’ (1974):

While monopoly control of industries was once the objective of J.P. Morgan and J.D. Rockefeller, by the late nineteenth century the inner sanctums of Wall Street understood that the most efficient way to gain an unchallenged monopoly was to “go political” and make society go to work for the monopolists — under the name of the public good and the public interest. This strategy was detailed in 1906 by Frederick C. Howe in his Confessions of a Monopolist. [1] Howe, by the way, is also a figure in the story of the Bolshevik Revolution.

Therefore, an alternative conceptual packaging of political ideas and politico-economic systems would be that of ranking the degree of individual freedom versus the degree of centralized political control. Under such an ordering the corporate welfare state and socialism are at the same end of the spectrum. Hence we see that attempts at monopoly control of society can have different labels while owning common features.

Consequently, one barrier to mature understanding of recent history is the notion that all capitalists are the bitter and unswerving enemies of all Marxists and socialists. This erroneous idea originated with Karl Marx and was undoubtedly useful to his purposes. In fact, the idea is nonsense. There has been a continuing, albeit concealed, alliance between international political capitalists and international revolutionary socialists — to their mutual benefit. This alliance has gone unobserved largely because historians — with a few notable exceptions — have an unconscious Marxian bias and are thus locked into the impossibility of any such alliance existing. The open-minded reader should bear two clues in mind: monopoly capitalists are the bitter enemies of laissez-faire entrepreneurs; and, given the weaknesses of socialist central planning, the totalitarian socialist state is a perfect captive market for monopoly capitalists, if an alliance can be made with the socialist powerbrokers. Suppose — and it is only hypothesis at this point — that American monopoly capitalists were able to reduce a planned socialist Russia to the status of a captive technical colony? Would not this be the logical twentieth-century internationalist extension of the Morgan railroad monopolies and the Rockefeller petroleum trust of the late nineteenth century?

********
Wall Street, Freemasonry and the Bolshevik Revolution

Video

Consensus history teaches that capitalism and communism are at opposite ends of the political-economic spectrum, and that communism is the bitter enemy of capitalism. In some ways this may be true. But those at the top of the global banking system — who are often labeled “greedy capitalists” — are not by any means classical, free-market capitalists. They are monopoly capitalists who are after complete control. They exercise their control over the people by their control over the money supply. Perhaps this can all be best summed up by one of the conspirators themselves; for instance, John D. Rockefeller, who once stated “competition is a sin.”

Communism IS monopoly capitalism. Lenin once stated that “communism is socialism in a hurry.” Communism is often brought about through violent and bloody revolution, whereas socialism often takes a more incremental and stealthy approach. However, the end game is still the same. For the past many decades, the countries of the West have been gradually moving in the direction of socialism, as people are losing more and more of their freedoms while government becomes bigger and ever more encroaching upon people’s rights, often under the pretense of solving the problems the system itself creates (poverty, crime, terrorism) to gain more control.

In order to have monopoly control over the people, you must first gain monopoly control over government through the issuance of credit (debt creation). This is what the international bankers have done.

This video takes a brief look at the role that the Anglo-American financiers played in fomenting the Bolshevik Revolution of 1917, marking the rise of communism in Russia, and a dialectical antithesis to capitalism that would play out on a global scale, moving us ever closer to the “third way” synthesis of a one world government, currency and military.

THE GLOBAL ECONOMY AND SCHOOL-TO-WORK

Posted on

By Dennis L. Cuddy, Ph.D.
June 2, 2008
NewsWithViews.com

https://i0.wp.com/www.readersdigest.ca/mag/2002/08/images/debt.gif

One of the power elite’s most powerful control devices is to get nations in debt, as they did with Britain via the Bank of England in the late 17th century. When the American colonies started printing their own money in the 1760s, Britain began a campaign against them (e.g., Stamp Act). This resulted in the American Revolution, which caused the power elite to plot how it could destroy this new independent republic.

Philip Freneau in AMERICAN MUSEUM (July 1792) explained that the power elite’s “grand nostrum” was the creation of debt “made as big as possible, as perpetual as possible, in as few hands as possible.” The Bank of the United States would be a key component of this effort, and when President Andrew Jackson made economic war on the Second Bank of the United States (not renewing its charter), an assassin attempted to kill him. The assassin failed but said he had powerful backers in Europe.

These backers, the power elite, wanted to break apart the U.S. According to John Lothrop Motley (U.S. Minister to Austria, 1861-1867) in a letter to his mother on March 15, 1861, “The great conspiracy to establish the Southern Republic” was concocted not long after the attempted assassination of President Jackson, and was “brought to maturity by (President) Buchanan’s Cabinet Ministers” about twenty years later.

On November 21, 1864 President Lincoln wrote to William Elkin that “the money power of the country will endeavor to prolong its reign by working upon the prejudices of the people until all wealth is aggregated in a few hands, and the Republic is destroyed. I feel at this moment more anxiety for the safety of my country than ever before, even in the midst of war.” Lincoln was assassinated less than five months later.

U.S. Minister Motley wrote in an 1861 letter to THE LONDON TIMES that the great conspiracy was “to establish a great Gulf Empire, including (in addition to the southern U.S. states) Mexico, Central America, Cuba and other islands, with unlimited cotton fields and unlimited negroes.” Today, the power elite’s plan has been modified to include “unlimited Hispanics” working for low wages, as power elite member Cecil Rhodes’ secret plan involved “absorbing the wealth of the world” in Rhodes’ own words. To do this, the power elite has created a global economy via GATT, etc. They also plan to link regional economic arrangements like NAFTA together with other regional arrangements. Regional economic integration will be followed by global economic integration. As Peter Drucker said in POST-CAPITALIST SOCIETY (1993): “These regions will not replace the nation-state. But they will sideline it…. The economic integration of the three countries (U.S., Canada and Mexico) into one region is proceeding so fast that it will make little difference whether the marriage is sanctified legally or not.”

The power elite also controls politicians of both major political parties in the U.S. via financial support. Political candidates this year are emphasizing technology in education so that students can get high-paying high-tech jobs to compete in the global economy. This sounds good, but it won’t work because there are only so many high-tech jobs to be had. Remember what happened when students were advised to become computer programmers? India produced computer programmers who worked for less, and many American computer jobs were outsourced. You can now see many former computer programmers in unemployment lines or bagging groceries.

Here’s what will happen to a child beginning school in the U.S. today. He’ll first receive a general education because we want well-rounded students who learn math and science but also who appreciate art, music, literature, and who know about history and government, etc. We know he’ll be dumbed down, though, because a recent survey by Common Core found that 57% of 17-year-olds didn’t know the Civil War occurred between 1850 and 1900! Around grade 8, he’ll be asked to choose a skill path, but he’ll be told he can change paths later because we value the freedom to choose one’s profession.

Compare that to a child who enters school in China with over 1.2 billion people, four times the population of America. There is a town in China today that specializes in neckties. The people there are becoming experts in this field. The schools beginning in kindergarten will emphasize reading, math, etc., all in terms of their relevance to the manufacture of neckties. The same will happen to other Chinese towns. They will specialize their schools to become producers of highly skilled workers in everything from tires and clothing to biotech products and telecommunications equipment. And these workers will produce these products at far less expense than American workers because salaries will be far lower. The Communist dictators of China will see to it.

How can Americans compete with that? We can’t. If American states try to do the same as China, then what happens? Does each of the fifty states compete against each other in the training of highly skilled workers in all fields? Then what happens to state X if state Y produces better workers in a particular field? Do all the states agree upon which state will specialize in each field? Then are all children in a particular state trained in that field? If the answer to the last question is “no” because that state wants well-rounded citizens free to choose their own career paths, then that state will be at a disadvantage against other states and countries that specialize in certain occupational fields. The power elite loves this because they see people only as worker bees.

However, America used to stand for something besides economic gain. We used to stand for a set of values such as freedom, but the power elite’s control of the global economy will destroy that. The following is a brief history of school-to-work (STW), which is the current educational undertaking in the U.S. preparing us eventually to become like China or face economic ruin in the global economy.

Plank 10 of Marx’s COMMUNIST MANIFESTO provides for a “combination of education with industrial production,” and in 1913 when Stalin was having difficulty getting his Marxist cadres into key positions for the “class struggle,” he described a “regionalism” strategy (e.g., NAFTA, later) against nationalism and used the slogan “workers of the world unite.”

Self-described American Communist Scott Nearing in THE NEXT STEP (1922) described how a world economic organization (e.g., GATT and World Trade Organization, later) would be the first step toward world government, but first in THE NEW EDUCATION (1915) he applauded “breaking away from the three Rs” and Cincinnati’s “halftime in shop, halftime in school” system. In the October 12, 1917 NEW YORK TIMES, Judge John Hylan wrote about a letter by Dr. Abraham Flexner (secretary of the Rockefeller General Education Board and formerly of the Carnegie Foundation) describing a “secret conference” of New York City board of education members to elect a board president who would institute a type of STW/OBE (outcome-based education) program. Hylan became mayor of New York and “pitched out the Rockefeller agents,… the kind of education the coolies receive in China… for the mill and factory.” William McAndrew, who had been in charge of the “new-program schools,” admiringly referred to the “polytechnic institute” (which the Soviets would adopt).

After Hylan’s expose of this STW/OBE plan, it wasn’t until the “Eight-Year Study” (1933-1941) funded by the Carnegie Corporation and Rockefeller’s General Education Board that another major attempt was evident. Research director for the study’s Evaluation Staff was Ralph Tyler, who would later conduct a project for the Carnegie Corporation that would in 1969 become the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP). One of Tyler’s associates in the “Eight-Year Study” was “values clarification” originator Louis Raths, and another associate was Estonian “change agent” Hilda Taba.

In the early 1950s, Ford Foundation president H. Rowan Gaither told a congressional committee research director Norman Dodd that they were operating under directives from the White House “to make every effort to so alter life in the U.S. as to make possible a comfortable merger with the Soviet Union.” And in 1960, HEW published SOVIET EDUCATION PROGRAMS stating “wherever we went, we felt the pulse of the Soviet government’s drive to educate and train a new generation of technically skilled citizens…. USSR plans to bring all secondary school children into labor education and training experiences through the regular school program.”

By 1970, Americans were coming to be thought of as “human capital” (note Lester Thurow’s 1970 book, INVESTMENT IN HUMAN CAPITAL), and in 1971 UNESCO’s secretariat asked George Parkyn to “outline a possible model” for an education system that resulted in TOWARDS A CONCEPTUAL MODEL OF LIFE-LONG EDUCATION describing how students would choose a vocational field and work part-time and receive “certificates” of educational attainment.

Two years later, Michael Lerner (who would become an important advisor to Hillary Clinton) wrote THE NEW SOCIALIST REVOLUTION, proclaiming: “Education will be radically transformed in our socialist community’. The main emphasis will be on learning how to… live and work collectively…. The next level is learning some series of skills for one’s first set of jobs.” And in Vladimir Turchenko’s THE SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNOLOGICAL REVOLUTION AND THE REVOLUTION IN EDUCATION (1976) imported into the U.S. is described “linking instruction with productive labor.”

In the early 1980s, neither the Soviet nor German socialist education systems had been adopted nationwide in the U.S., as Prof. Eugene Boyce in THE COMING REVOLUTION IN EDUCATION (1983) wrote that “in the Communist ideology… education is tied directly to jobs…. No such direct controlled relationship between education and jobs exists in democratic countries.” However, in 1985 two things happened. At the beginning of the year, the Carnegie Corporation gave $600,000 to establish the Carnegie Forum on Education and the Economy; and later that year the Carnegie Corporation negotiated the Soviet-American Exchange Agreement for the U.S. government, whereby Soviet educators became involved in planning curricula for some U.S. schools. In the Winter 1987/1988 ACTION IN TEACHER EDUCATION, Professors Martin Haberman and James Collins wrote in “The Future of the Teaching Profession” that “schooling is now seen primarily as job training and, for this reason, quite comparable to schooling in non-democratic societies. Once education is redefined as a personal good and as emphasizing preparation for the world of work as its first purpose, our schools can appropriately be compared with those of the U.S.S.R.”

The next year, the National Center on Education and the Economy (NCEE, formerly the Carnegie Forum) with Marc Tucker as president was asked to help in developing the National Education Goals upon which “America 2000” and “Goals 2000” would be based. Then in June 1990, NCEE (with board members Hillary Clinton and David Rockefeller, Jr.) produced AMERICA’S CHOICE: HIGH SKILLS OR LOW WAGES? (proposing a “Certificate of Initial Mastery”), which greatly influenced the establishment of the Secretary’s Commission on Achieving Necessary Skills (SCANS) by the Department of Labor. In September, POLYTECHNICAL EDUCATION: A STEP (funded by the U.S. Department of Education) by Robert Beck was published, stating: “The Soviet Union… has developed aa curriculum known as polytechnical education… rooted in Marxist-Lenninist ideology…. The German Democratic Republic has accomplished a good deal with its polytechnical education…. The ideology of Soviet education has blessed the melding of restructured academic studies… and the preparation of students for skilled labor…. That at this should be carefully monitored for possible adaptation in American public education is not a farfetched idea.” (POLYTECHNICAL EDUCATION: A STEP was published by the National Center for Research in Vocational Education at the University of California at Berkeley just three months after AMERICA’S CHOICE: HIGH SKILLS OR LOW WAGES?, a report by the NCEE’s Commission on the Skills of the American Workforce which included Laura D’Andrea Tyson, the director of research for the Berkeley Roundtable on the International Economy at the University of California at Berkeley, who has been a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and would become chairman of President Clinton’s Council of Economic Advisors.)

In June of the next year (1991), the SCANS report recommended establishing a national system for certifying competency, similar to Germany’s “certificate of mastery.” Also in 1991, Carnegie Foundation chairman David Hornbeck’s co-edited HUMAN CAPITAL AND AMERICA’S FUTURE was published describing an approach he admitted might be subject to the charge of “big brotherism.”

On August 2, 1992, Assistant Labor Secretary Roberts Jones announced that the federal government was preparing to deny aid and student loans to schools that failed to prepare their graduates with the skills needed to compete for jobs in the modern workplace, saying “this is a touchy subject.” Shortly thereafter, Marc Tucker wrote a letter to Hillary Clinton saying he had just come from David Rockefeller, Jr.’s office where they were “celebrating” Bill Clinton’s election as president, as that will allow putting into place their agenda to integrate education into a national system of “human resources development… from cradle to grave… (for) everyone…. We propose that Bill (Clinton) take a leaf out of the German book” (regarding required) “apprenticeship slots.” Relevant to this, however, was a paper commissioned by the School-To-Work Transition Team in the Office of Educational Research and Improvement (OERI) within the U.S.

Department of Education (one of a set of commissioned papers published by OERI in June 1994). In this paper, “Determinants and Consequences of Fit Between Vocational Education and Employment in Germany,” Professors James Witte and Arne Kalleberg stated that “the German apprenticeship system is so expensive…. Germany’s contemporary vocational system is closely linked to its secondary educational system. At age ten, students are tracked in a rigid educational system…. After initial assignment, movement between tracks is rare.”

NCEE board member Hillary Clinton had been promoting the Certificate of Initial Mastery (concept), and in April 1994 NCEE’s Tucker had published THE CERTIFICATE OF INITIAL MASTERY: A PRIMER. The same year, Sen. Ted Kennedy’s School-To-Work Opportunities Act was passed, and a national campaign was underway to promote the concept. In 1996, Miss America Shawntel Smith in Michigan spoke about “our investment in human capital. That’s what School-To-Work is all about.”

Currently, students have the most to say about what career paths they take. But as “human capital,” their paths increasingly will be directed by society via “STW/OBE educational programs so that they “demonstrate certain skills.” A leading OBE consultant today, Harvard University Professor Howard Gardner (who was involved in the infamous MACOS project) wrote FRAMES OF MIND: THE THEORY OF MULTIPLE INTELLIGENCES in which he proposed that “ultimately, the educational plans that are pursued need to be orchestrated across various interest groups of the society so that they can, taken together, help the society to achieve its larger goals. Individual profiles must be considered in the light of goals pursued by the wider society; and sometimes, in fact, individuals with gifts in certain directions must nonetheless be guided along other, less favored paths, simply because the needs of the culture are particularly urgent in that realm at that time.” Student “profiles” are an important part of certain STW initiatives, with employers having continued access to these as part of a permanent file on all individuals who are now considered to be “lifelong learners.” In Communist China, the file is called a “dangan” and describes the value of the individual (“human capital”) to the State. Gardner also wrote TO OPEN MINDS: CHINESE CLUES TO THE DILEMMA OF CONTEMPORARY EDUCATION. If Americans aren’t careful, STW/OBE educational programs will pave the way toward an ominous techno-feudal world of the future.

© 2008 Dennis Cuddy – All Rights Reserved

http://www.newswithviews.com/Cuddy/dennis130.htm

AMERICANS EMBRACING THE IRON FIST OF TOTALITARIAN GOVERNMENT

Posted on

By: Devvy Kidd
May 26, 2008

© 2008 – NewsWithViews.com

(print image)art by Alex Cherry

Despite the massive, overwhelming documentation proving that elite groups around the world have been planning the complete annihilation of this constitutional republic for a more than a hundred years, Americans continue to deny, deny, deny. Let me give you this example. It’s an email I received a few days ago regarding a January 7, 2005, column I wrote titled, President Bush supporting global communist domination:

“That is the most absurd statement I have ever heard and you fail to detail just how this is transpiring. Either you are outright ignorant or you are joking. Communism is the exact opposite of what Georgie boy stands for. He is a capitalist and has tried to kill suspected terrorist communist Hugo Chavez. How in hell do you equate Bush with communism? You are too absurd to even bother with!”

I politely directed him to two columns for research: The Proper Role of America’s Military and The Praetorian Guard. Of course, this person never bothered to get the facts from them because he addressed me as Sir in a snit he fired off:

“Sir, I have three graduate degrees, taught history and education courses in colleges and am 67 years old and I have done more research than you can even imagine. I eschew lying television news but you sound like a Fox bred brat. Don’t tell me to do any more research, yours was faulty and at some two bit college no doubt. I am a big ten man. Get lost with your bunk! “

Wow! He’s a big ten man! It is just this level of ignorance and denial that has allowed the destroyers to bring this nation to the brink of ruin and a police state. A closed mind is a dangerous weapon.

This country is full of Americans who also suffer from a mass case of infantilism. A couple of months ago a man who identified himself as a college professor wanted me to review his book. While I am sincerely flattered, it’s impossible for me to read every request from individuals who write books. My Reading Room has a list of books I have read which I need to update it because I’ve read another hundred books since the posting. In any event, when I politely declined, this author sent me a snotty email telling me I was making a big mistake, his book had facts no one else had! Just like a little kid who can’t have his way.

Hundreds, if not thousands of writers and investigative journalists have been pumping out the facts on the implementation of a one world government. We have exposed the players, the organizations and the politicians. We have exposed the corrupt “mainstream” media (print and electronic), including cable networks (MSNBC, FAUX, CNN) who lie through omission and openly support those who are carrying the water for the global lunatics. Our biggest cannon has been the Internet. This tool has allowed us to reach millions of Americans with the truth and we will continue to do so. However, the bottom line as I have said so many times before is that only we the people can stop these united States of America from becoming part of a global region is by rejecting the agenda.

The mendacity by these evil individuals world wide pushing globalization down our throats has been incredible. The program adopted to bring these plans to fruition has worked beyond their wildest dreams because tens of millions of Americans have allowed it to happen either through laziness, blind party loyalty, indifference and apathy. However, as time has gone by and conditions worsen for the American people, millions are waking up. Sadly, many more millions are willing to surrender their freedom and liberty for scraps from the King’s table.

In my last column, I strongly recommended that people read an assessment by my dearest friend, retired USAF Brigadier General Ben Partin, titled, Deadly Failures in Intelligence Analysis and Defense Preparedness. Ben is no lightweight; his bio is in the link. There is a three volume tome on the communist blueprint for world domination titled ‘The Program,’ which Ben and I discussed at great length when I was at his home a week ago in Virginia. I have been pounding on this for years in my columns. Copies of these three books are hard to find and cost more than a $100 dollars per book. This work titled, ‘The Communist International,’ is broken down into time periods. It was issued under the Royal Institute of International Affairs. This organization touts itself as a home for “forward thinking.” Another global operation. Beware the forward thinkers and progressives. They are dangerous to freedom.

The Communist Party USA is alive and well in this country. They are working to over throw our constitutional republic. They consistently endorse Democrat candidates like Al Gore and John Kerry. Right now they’re leaning towards a fellow comrade, Barack Obama. The Sixth Congress put on by the commies over in Moscow made clear their goals and there has never been any retreat despite the massive propaganda thrown at the American people – “Take down that wall, Mr. Gorebechev!” Reagan had nothing to do with the collapse of the Soviet Union. From the main U.S. Marxist web site:

“And the most important thing in all this is that Social-Democracy is the main channel of imperialist pacifism within the working class — consequently, it is capitalism’s main support among the working class in preparing for new wars and intervention. But for the preparation of new wars pacifism alone is not enough, even if it is supported by so serious a force as Social-Democracy. For this, certain means of suppressing the masses in the imperialist centres are also needed. It is impossible to wage war for imperialism unless the rear of imperialism is strengthened. It is impossible to strengthen the rear of imperialism without suppressing the workers. And that is what fascism is for.” Michael Bloomberg, Mayor of New York City, is the classic Fascist. He and Benito Mussolini would have been great pals.

‘The Communist International,’ Volume II, 1919-1943, is a precise blue print for establishing world wide communism and destroying capitalist countries like these united States of America. It contains the usual gushing about colonial peoples (that’s us), the bourgeoisie and other deadly mumbo jumbo. Each subsection has it’s own title, i.e., ‘The Struggle for World Proletarian Dictatorship and the Principal Types of Revolution.’ The Reds laid it all out nice and plain. Of course, this is of little interest to a population taught fluff in the government’s indoctrination centers (public schools) and bred to government dependency by design. Tens of millions will watch garbage like American Idol, spend endless hours looking at porn on the Net, twittering at the costmetics counter or rotting in front of the boob tube watching sports ad nauseum, but anything above that level simply doesn’t interest them or is beyond their ability to grasp.

Today millions of Americans depend on mother government for their very livelihood. The American people have been expertly boxed into a corner. With the destruction of our most important job bases caused by Congress, their financial well being now depends on continuing to support the very programs destroying this country. When it comes to the U.S. Constitution vs jobs, guess what loses? If you click here, you will get a pdf file that contains pages from ‘The Communist International.’ Read them this weekend. It will give you a better grasp on ‘The Program’ and how the American people are being led to the slaughter.

Those who think communism is dead are making a fatal mistake. The push for world domination has never subsided. This link is to eleven pages from the transcript of ‘Public Hearings, Joint Committee on Regional Government, September 26, 1978,’ in Edwardsville, Illinois. Regional governance is one of the major building blocks to destroy private property rights and keep the American people in their proper herds. These hearings also deal with a malignant cancer called tax exempt foundations working to destroy this country. They also employ tens of thousands of Americans. At the very least, ring leaders like David Rockefeller should have been charged with sedition decades ago. If I were the U.S. Attorney General, I would have charged them with treason.

Please read on page 52, the testimony of Norman Dodd, chief investigator in 1953 for U.S. Congressman B. Carroll Reece, whose committee investigated tax-exempt foundations run by the biggest traitors in this nation. This investigation eventually narrowed down to about 10 foundations, those chief among them for Un-American activities were Rockefeller, Ford, Carnegie and the Rhodes Scholarship Fund:

“Mr. Dodd, we have invited you to come to NY and stop in and see us in the hope that, off the record, you would tell us why the Congress of the U.S. should be interested in an operation such as ours.” Before I could think of just exactly how I would reply, Mr. Gaither volunteered the following information, and these are practically in his exact words: “Mr. Dodd, we operate here under directives which emanate from the White House. Would you like to know what the substance of these directives is?” I said, “Indeed, I would, Mr. Gaither.”

“Whereupon he then said the following: “We here, operate and control our grant making policies in harmony with the directives, the substance of which is as follows: We shall use our grant making power so to alter life in the U.S. that it can be comfortably merged with the Soviet Union.”

Page 53: “Now, the second experience that I would like to share with you, oh, and incidentally, it is the Ford Foundation’s grants which are responsible for the formulation of this idea of regional government, and also the idea that given regional government, we must, in turn, develop and accept and agree to a totally New Constitution which has already been drawn up, as was mentioned just a few minutes ago.” Take a look at “Americans” who were Rhodes Scholarship Fund recipients. You can also view a number of documents from my Reading Room which clearly shows how many elected officials (state and federal) who endorse one world government. This is the link. Page 103, Congressional Record, Minnesota’s endorsement of a Declaration of Interdependence to “join with others to bring forth a new world order.” pages 107, 109- 116; 121 – 123; 129; 131: UNESCO is “another attempt to destroy the United States”; pg. 135 Bricker; pages 139 – 146, March 25, 1976: “A major event…forumation of the Declaration of Interdependence…endorsed by 30 Senators and almost 100 Congressmen.” That’s just a small sampling of documents I spent days scanning. Treason right out in the open.

Back on February 4, 2008, I quoted this in my column:

“We must realize that our party’s most powerful weapon is racial tension. By propounding into the consciousness of the dark races that for centuries they have been oppressed by the whites, we can mold them to the program of the Communist Party. In America we will aim for subtle victory. While inflaming the Negro minority against the whites, we will endeavor to install in the whites a guilt complex for their exploitation of the Negroes. We will aid the Negroes to rise in prominence in every walk of life, in the professions and in the world of sports and entertainment. With this prestige, the Negro will be able to intermarry with the whites and begin a process which will deliver America to our cause.” Israel Cohen, a leading Communist in England, in his ‘A Racial Program For The 20th Century (1912).’ Quoted by Congressman Abernathy, Congressional Record, June 7, 1957, p. 8559

I was accused of being a racist; same old worn out attack. If you click here, you’ll see another page from ‘The Communist International’ which reads: “On 14 September 1925 the orgbureau discussed the Negro congress to be held the following month in Chicago, organized by the American CP (Communist Party).” The goal was/is to use our fellow Americans of the Negro race to further inculcate the communist doctrine. It’s sickening. Agitate, continue with constant haranguing that the Negro is oppressed by white America and all the other propaganda so they will turn to the imaginary utopia of communism. It is why Martin Luther King was brought to prominence. We know for a fact that Barack Obama was mentored and trained by communists; click here. People continue to have selective blindness because they forget Obama is a mulatto; half Caucasian, half Negro. However, for the purposes of the masters behind the scenes who pull the strings, Obama has black skin and therefore is their useful fool of choice this election. Should Obama’s stinking baggage somehow derail him, fellow comrade, Marxist Hillary Clinton is waiting in the wings.

Perhaps those in denial would like to read the truth from someone who would know: ‘New Lies for Old: The Communist Strategy of Deception and Disinformation’ by Anatoliy Golitsyn, a former KGB officer. “This book is the product of nearly twenty years of my life. It presents my convictions that, throughout that period, the West has misunderstood the nature of changes in the communist world and has been misled and outmaneuvered by communist guile.” This book is now available for free on the Internet.

I urge you to listen to Ben Partin on the Jeff Rense radio show tonight, May 26th. Ben knows this material inside and out. He should because he’s been on it for six decades. What he has to tell the American people is critical in understanding how the people of this country are embracing their own destruction. Ask family and friends to listen. Tell them you would like their opinion on what they hear. Click here to get the broadcast. You might tune in a few minutes early just to make sure you’re set for the broadcast. Don’t miss this critical program.

If for some reason you can’t listen, you can watch Ben explain OKC, WACO and world communism for free. I put on a sold out event at the Santa Clara Convention Center in June, 1998; Ben was a featured speaker. He was 72 years old then; a remarkable man who has never been given the credit due him for all his work in exposing the lies and ‘The Program’ to destroy this republic. This free Internet video is a must watch.

Change is not possible with the same players. We can only destroy the destroyers by identifying who they are and refusing to enrich them with our buying power and support. Americans have been taking a knife to a gun fight because they do not understand the genesis of the problems (health care, SS, failed foreign policy, energy, our monetary system and these endless wars) plaguing this country. You can’t solve a problem if you don’t know how it started. We cannot and will not defeat the planned destruction of this republic unless each and every one of us that now number in the millions reject the program and that requires a solid understanding. More on this in my next column. Also, you can listen to dozens of my columns on audio (free) on my web site; download to your IPod or to a CD and listen while driving. In addition to Ben’s speech referenced above, you can also watch two other speakers from that day, constitutional attorney Larry Becraft and Dr. Eugene Schroeder on the War and Emergency Powers issue. Feel free to watch; download onto a CD and share this knowledge.

Learning Links:

1 – United States-Russian Merger: A Done Deal?
2 – Membership roster of the Council on Foreign Relations
3 – Treasonous agenda of the Council on Foreign Relations
4 – Treasonous agenda of the Trilateral Commission
5 – Republican Party, Red From the Start
6 – Should Democratic Party merge with Communist Party?

© 2008 – NewsWithViews.com – All Rights Reserved

http://www.newswithviews.com/Devvy/kidd362.htm