Conspiracies Make the World Go Round

Posted on Updated on

On the left is is a fused meteorite like piece from the fuselage of Paul Wellstone’s plane taken from the film  Wellstone: They Killed Him. To the right is a meteorite like relic from one of the World Trade Center towers after it exploded and collapsed. Reportedly, Wellstone’s plane burned for 7.5 hours with a blue-white flame, blue gray smoke, melting the fuselage. Not your typical kerosene-based jet fuel fire. Fires and molten metal were observed for months after 9/11 at the WTC complex. Certainly it was not because of jet fuel and office materials burning. In both cases a tremendous amount of energy was required to fuse the materials shown in the photos.

Wellstone’s assassination and 9/11 are intimately linked. Wellstone had questions about 9/11 and the subsequent war agenda. He was silenced.

These men who have been assassinated are the models to others in Congress and the Pentagon, to stay in line and do as they are told or else.

An article on a local news site today, Hinckley Stalked Carter in Tennessee, rehashes the story of John Hinckley Jr. being arrested at the Nashville airport trying to board a plane to NY with three handguns. Jimmy Carter happened to be in town that same day and also flew to NY later on. It was six months before Hinckley Jr. allegedly tried to assassinate Reagan. There was no mention of the Hinckley and Bush family connections but the question was raised as to why the FBI allowed Hinckley to leave the city after posting a small bond. A conspiracy theorist might speculate that he was being handled. Officially he was just another lone nut who never faced a trial, only the inside of a mental institution.

That’s just a couple of examples that struck me in my daily reads. Conspiracies are recognizable when they affect a great number of people in negative ways and when no one is openly and transparently held accountable. Deceptions rule the roost when the message is controlled but it seems here lately that the conspirators are getting bolder and even sloppy as it gives them a thrill to laugh in our faces and believe we won’t do anything about it. This could be the year when that changes. Aren’t we all a little tired of the conspiracies?

Being an election year we have to face up to the fact that election fraud is a conspiracy fact, not a theory. It couldn’t be the electronic voting machines that pose the greatest potential for flip flopping the votes, could it?
Not according to some Repub led state legislatures like Tennessee who are requiring photo ID’s to step into the booth. Yep, that’ll fix it. Well, unless it’s the Iowa caucus where they won’t be required. Whatever happened to the cry for paper ballots that might ensure some sort of reasonable fair election tallying? Oh yeah, they’re too much trouble for election workers as I have personally been told by some of them and also kill a bunch of trees.

The conspiracy that affects us probably the most on many levels is war. War is God sums it up fairly well. Liars and illusionists and psychopaths conspire to maneuver us to give our blessings to kill and be killed. If there are winners in any upcoming wars they will once again write the history to fit the deceptions.  Too many folks are caught up in the ‘wars and rumors of wars’ will always be with us mindset to step up against the conspiracies that cause them.

It’s time for people of good will to conspire among themselves. Conspire for peace. Conspire for justice and honesty. Conspire for truth. Fight the unlawful, immoral conspiracies of control, death and destruction with those of opposite inclinations. Some in the OWS movement have hinted at it. Changing the perceived meaning of the term conspiracy to one of folks working together for positive change would be a start. Our definition would simply be “any concurrence in action.”

It depends on how you look at it but the report that Americans bought more guns in November and December of 2011 than in any two months in history is either disturbing or just a realistic sign of the times. Maybe it’s both. It’s not only the realization that in these days of economic uncertainly that we may have the need to protect ourselves from the common street thugs but also the possibility that we need protection from our own government. I’m sure there are those who are sitting in their back rooms conspiring on how to neutralize this trend of an ever increasing armed America. Violence against those who conspire to violate our inherent rights is a worst case scenario. We will never wish for that outcome. We also will not shy away from being prepared. Some will say it’s the only thing that can keep the treacherous conspirators at bay. You never know.


The Pearl Harbor Deception

Posted on Updated on

All war is by deception. Even those we are taught were “good.”

Dec. 7, 1941 was “a day of infamy,” in more ways than one.

FDR and the making of a war

by Srdja Trifkovic

The “mother of all conspiracies.”

The claims can be summarized as follows: President Franklin D. Roosevelt wanted to enter the war in Europe, especially after the fall of France (June 1940). In this desire he was supported by the old elite of Anglophile Wasps and by the increasingly influential Jewish lobby. In June 1941 they were joined by the assorted leftists who cared about the Soviet Union more than about America. After meeting FDR at the Atlantic Conference (August 14, 1941) Churchill noted the “astonishing depth of Roosevelt’s intense desire for war.” But there was a problem: the President could not overcome the resistance to “Europe’s war” felt by most Americans and their elected representatives.

The mood of the country was a problem, and Roosevelt therefore resorted to subterfuge. He systematically and deliberately provoked the Japanese into attacking the United States. His real target was Hitler: Roosevelt expected the German dictator to abide by the Tripartite Pact and declare war on America, and hoped that Hitler’s decision would be facilitated by a display of America’s apparent vulnerability. Accordingly, even though Roosevelt was well aware of the impending attack on Pearl Harbor, he let it happen and was relieved, even pleased, when it did. The evidence is circumstantial, of course, and chronologically its more important elements proceed as follows:

1. In the summer of 1940 Roosevelt ordered the Pacific to relocate from the West Coast to Hawaii. When its commander, Admiral Richardson, protested that Pearl Harbor offered inadequate protection from air and torpedo attack he was replaced.

2. On October 7 1940 Navy IQ analyst McCollum wrote an eight-point memo for Roosevelt on how to force Japan into war with U.S., including an American oil embargo against Japan. All of them were eventually accomplished.

3. On 23 June 1941 – one day after Hitler’s attack on Russia – Secretary of the Interior and FDR’s Advisor Harold Ickes wrote a memo for the President in which he pointed out that “there might develop from the embargoing of oil to Japan such a situation as would make it not only possible but easy to get into this war in an effective way. And if we should thus indirectly be brought in, we would avoid the criticism that we had gone in as an ally of communistic Russia.”

4. On 18 October Ickes noted in his diary: “For a long time I have believed that our best entrance into the war would be by way of Japan.”

5. The U.S. had cracked key Japanese codes before the attack. FDR received “raw” translations of all key messages. On 24 September 1941 Washington deciphered a message from the Naval Intelligence HQ in Tokyo to Japan’s consul-general in Honolulu, requesting grid of exact locations of U.S. Navy ships in the harbor. Commanders in Hawaii were not warned.

6. Sixty years later the U.S. Government still refuses to identify or declassify many pre-attack decrypts on the grounds of “national security”!

7. On November 25 Secretary of War Stimson wrote in his diary that FDR said an attack was likely within days, and asked “how we should maneuver them into the position of firing the first shot without too much danger to ourselves. In spite of the risk involved, however, in letting the Japanese fire the first shot, we realized that in order to have the full support of the American people it was desirable to make sure that the Japanese be the ones to do this so that there should remain no doubt in anyone’s mind as to who were the aggressors.”

8. On November 25 FDR received a “positive war warning” from Churchill that the Japanese would strike against America at the end of the first week in December. This warning caused the President to do an abrupt about-face on plans for a time-buying modus vivendi with Japan and it resulted in Secretary of State Hull’s deliberately provocative ultimatum of 26 November 1941 that guaranteed war.

9. On November 26 Washington ordered both US aircraft carriers, the Enterprise and the Lexington, out of Pearl Harbor “as soon as possible”. This order included stripping Pearl of 50 planes or 40 percent of its already inadequate fighter protection. On the same day Cordell Hull issued his ultimatum demanding full Japanese withdrawal from Indochina and all China. U.S. Ambassador to Japan called this “The document that touched the button that started the war.”

10. On November 29 Hull told United Press reporter Joe Leib that Pearl Harbor would be attacked on December 7. The New York Times reported on December 8 (“Attack Was Expected,” p. 13) that the U.S. knew of the attack a week earlier.

11. On December 1 Office of Naval Intelligence, ONI, 12th Naval District in San Francisco found the missing Japanese fleet by correlating reports from the four wireless news services and several shipping companies that they were getting signals west of Hawaii.

12. On 5 December FDR wrote to the Australian Prime Minister, “There is always the Japanese to consider. Perhaps the next four or five days will decide the matters.”

Particularly indicative is Roosevelt’s behavior on the day of the attack itself. Harry Hopkins, who was alone with FDR when he received the news, wrote that the President was unsurprised and expressed “great relief.” Later in the afternoon Harry Hopkins wrote that the war cabinet conference “met in not too tense an atmosphere because I think that all of us believed that in the last analysis the enemy was Hitler… and that Japan had given us an opportunity.” That same evening FDR said to his cabinet, “We have reason to believe that the Germans have told the Japanese that if Japan declares war, they will too. In other words, a declaration of war by Japan automatically brings…” – at which point he was interrupted, but his expectations were perfectly clear. CBS newsman Edward R. Murrow met Roosevelt at midnight and was surprised at FDR’s calm reaction. The following morning Roosevelt stressed to his speechwriter Rosenman that “Hitler was still the first target, but he feared that a great many Americans would insist that we make the war in the Pacific at least equally important with the war against Hitler.”

Jonathan Daniels, administrative assistant and press secretary to FDR, later said “the blow was heavier than he had hoped it would necessarily be… But the risks paid off; even the loss was worth the price.” Roosevelt confirmed this to Stalin at Tehran on November 30, 1943, by saying that “if the Japanese had not attacked the US he doubted very much if it would have been possible to send any American forces to Europe.”

Hitherto eminently establishmentarian historian Jonathan Toland has made it possible for Pearl Harbor “conspiracy theorists” to become more respectable “revisionists” with his Infamy: Pearl Harbor and its Aftermath [1981]: “Was it possible to imagine a President who remarked, ‘This means war,’ after reading the [thirteen-part 6 December] message, not instantly summoning to the White House his Army and Navy commanders as well as his Secretaries of War and Navy? … Stimson, Marshall, Stark and Harry Hopkins had spent most of the night of December 6 at the White House with the President. All were waiting for what they knew was coming: an attack on Pearl Harbor. The comedy of errors on the sixth and seventh appears incredible. It only makes sense if it was a charade, and Roosevelt and the inner circle had known about the attack.”

Churchill later wrote that FDR and his top advisors “knew the full and immediate purpose of their enemy”: “A Japanese attack upon the U.S. was a vast simplification of their problems and their duty. How can we wonder that they regarded the actual form of the attack, or even its scale, as incomparably less important than the fact that the whole American nation would be united?”

The real target, Adolf Hitler, duly walked into the trap on December 10, 1941, thus committing the greatest blunder of his career and ensuring Germany’s defeat. The rest, as they say, is history. The ensuing fury gave birth first to a superpower, then to an empire. It swept away doubters and isolationists, it legitimized a total war for unconditional surrender. It created nuclear weapons, the Cold War, the military-industrial complex, the “intelligence community,” and today’s benevolent global hegemony. The people who run the American Empire today will as strenuously deny the existence of a Pearl Harbor conspiracy as their predecessors denied it half a century ago. But in their hearts they’ll admit that, even if there had not been one, it should have been invented.

Much more at apfn

Pearl Harbor – Mother of all Conspiracies

Fascism and False Flags = War By Deanna Spingola

Pearl Harbor – Conspiracy

A National Security Agency (NSA) Study rules out Pearl Harbor conspiracy – 2008

Well of course, any admission might lead to more questioning of 9/11 …..

Distrust Rising

Posted on

Over the last few days I have been surprised by a number of local people who are saying that the BP oil rig explosion and spill was not an accident but deliberate.Their ideas are it was an inside job of some sort to keep the price of oil up and going higher.

These are not folks inclined towards conspiratorial theories, at least not in the 9/11 and wars for lies vein. But when it comes to oil and gas prices and the possibility of the oil industry killing their own and creating an environment disaster for a long term agenda, they are open to the prospect.

Whether the ‘event’ was actually an accident where all the ‘fail safe’ measures failed or something more, the suspicions of some seem to me to be an example of the growing distrust of government and corporations among the population.

Even if the rig disaster was an accident, the Hegelian Dialectic of problem … reaction … solution is coming into play. As Rahm Emanuel would say “You never let a serious crisis go to waste.”

Did Someone Blow Up That BP Oil Rig

Bad Boys, Bad Boys: Obama Sending SWAT Teams To Inspect Gulf Oil Rigs

10 suspects, and motives as to why the Gulf oil spill was an inside job

Yes I know… Not everything is a conspiracy, but I don’t let that stop me from theorizing, especially when a certain incident has so many beneficiaries. Sure, as Rhambo Emanuel is famous for saying… “Never waste a good crisis” – good enough, except this crisis in many ways places some oily egg right on his face.

While is possible that this TOO was just another example of “incompetence” or Mother nature fighting back… We owe it to ourselves to fully analyze the situation, its players, and beneficiaries.

Consider this a starting place for reasons that the Gulf of Mexico oil spill was an inside job, and go from there. My point is not to convince you, but to make sure we aren’t missing anything by simply buying in to the Media version of events. In fleshing this all out I will be counting in two columns. Who stands to gain, and who had a motive and opportunity.

Whats fishy here is that all the witnesses have vanished! 11 people BTW (there’s that pesky 11 again). There is no surveillance video evidence, even though we are talking about billions of dollars sitting offshore. Surveillance cameras at the BP gas stations, but not on their oil rig? Yeah… there were no cameras at the Pentagon, or at Oklahoma City either… wink wink.

Here is the list of suspects, not particularly in any order.

1) ENVIRONMENTALISTS. “Eco Terror” is a fact of life, For decades some of the most radical and dangerous groups have been environmentalists. In a way its hard to blame them. Most of the planet has been polluted by the Kleptocracy for decades. Through mind numbing propaganda, the environmental movement have been conditioned to believe that if drastic measures are not taken ASAP… Were all gonna Diiiiiiiiiiiiiie! (This “Movement” was started interestingly enough by the same people who own BP, see below)

So its no wonder they capable of doing anything to save the planet.This includes targeting “capitalist” oil rigs.

(If I believed as they do, I might be just as capable of same.)

They have a motive. The question is, do they have the means. It would have been an incredible feat, but with enough planning, people and bravado… It could be done. I tend to lean very low on this one though. The collateral damage to the environment should rule them out altogether, and it would take a commando style raid on the armed rig. While its possible, it’s not likely. Count on them to exploit the problem just the same.

2) OPEC: The global economic war is a serious one with players from every ideology. OPEC stands to gain as this incident will effect the price of oil, supply and demand. When you loose millions of gallons of domestic oil, who do you go to to make up the difference? Yep.

We should also consider that an increase in off shore drilling, if it catches on, could cost OPEC 100’s of Billions annually. (We all heard Obama a few weeks back promising to do more drilling. Was that just pandering? See below) Therefore if OPEC could throw a monkey wrench into the works by causing a conveniently timed disaster, would they? Sure. Could they?

They have a motive. As for the means, they have that too.

The problem with pinning it one them is its too obvious, and it would be too much of a risk for them to attempt. Also the US (as Iraq) is a member, so…. would the US purposely attack themselves? Ok, dumb question. Still – I rule out OPEC, but will explore some of the members below.

3) Shrimp and Fish (IE: Food) cartels. (Today, the US harvests over 650 million pounds of shrimp a year, more than any other country. And still this is not enough to fill the need, in spite of shrimp-farming. The US imports yet another 200 million pounds a year. )

Yeah, yeah Its a stretch. Obviously the price of a shrimp cocktail will be out of site for the next few years. While the cartels do stand to gain, have access to this part of the world, and the money to make it all so… Its just too out of the realm of reality. (We can keep in mind that many on this list cross pollinate, and have some of the same owners!)

Our hearts go out the the families who will lose their livelihoods while the cleanup continues. 

4) THE SECURITY INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX: Always looking for new people to protect, and tied in to some of the most nafarious groups the world over, the SIC could definately befefit from the Oil Rig Distater. I would guess that someone already had the contract to train the men and protect the rig. Well they failed, and a new player can now move in on the territory.

many companies under this banner can easily make something like this happen, but I am betting that the group holding the current contract stood down to make this happen. (unless a drug cartel was responsible) Whatever happens you can bet that all rigs will up their security after this. Cha CHING for the SID!

5) RUSSIA / VENEZUELA AXIS: The economic enegry war has been waged from the west on players like this. Like OPEC, they always stand to gain when oil becomes scarce. No doubt they cheered when they heard the news! Oil futures have been artificially high as of late and I attribute that to some back door negotiations with the US.

Russia obviously has the know how (tetonic and exotic waeponry) and would do the deed if they were sure they wouldnt get caught. It lays them out for FULL ON retailiation though. This is why I would have to rule them out for now. Poke the Tiger and get your head bitten off.

6) BP: Would BP attack itself? Uh … the 7/7 underground bombing is London says YES. What would be their motive?

Higher oil prices which might be canceled out by the bill for all the damages? No… the only reason for their involvement is… ha ha EVERY CUI BONO IN THIS ARTICLE. They ARE the environmental movement, They Are western / global intelligence. They ARE the drug smugglers. They are the economic hit men!!!! This makes BP a prime suspect, at least for a stand down and a cover up.

7) GULF DRUG CARTELS: One of the things that Mike Ruppert did best was to blow the whistle on how offshore oil rigs were being used as a drop, and ship for Cocaine and other elicit drugs. He implicated Halliburton (KBR) in doing so (see below)

The theory here is that the Gulf Cartel(s) wanting to wipe out the CIA / MI6, et al competition and strike a blow to the oligarchs in the process. The cartels are militarized, well trained, and extreme. They have the funds to buy whatever was needed to blow the rig and get rid of the witnesses. They have to be in consideration for prime suspect at this point, but it would have been a HUGE risk for them.

8) GLOBAL INTELLIGENCE / CIA:This would run as a opposite to the benefits gained by Russia and Venezuela, OPEC etc… The prime target would be China in this regard. The shadowy world of economic hit men has been detailed extensively by Jim Norman (the Oil Card) and John Perkins (Confession of an economic hit man) Unlike the environmentalist movement, GI doesn’t care one whit about collateral damage. People get hurt by them all the time. They might even want this kind of Chaos and distraction. If you analyze it, this theory probably makes the most sense. So they have the motive, the track record, and the resources to pull it off. Top suspect IMO.

9) HALLIBURTON: These guys, like Bechtel.. are very powerful. So powerful in fact, that they can escape blame for the spill, and turn it into huge profits. While they should be considered a perfect accomplice to Global Intel groups, they would not likely be the masterminds. This is because they are doing everything they can to keep a low profile, after years of bad publicity. They would play a part, but not chance much more.

10) DNC / SOROS / AL GORE / FOB’s (OBAMA’S BACKERS) “Spill baby Spill” will now replace “Drill Baby Drill” which should cripple and pro drilling America first style energy policy previously sloganized by Aw Shucks Sarah Palin and crew. This would mean that Obama’s announcement to increase off shore drilling was a well timed ruse they had no intention of following through on. That’s done now, and so is anyone who wants to use it as a political weapon against cousin Barry and Crew.

Obama backers can see this and the Mine tragedy last month as a win for their “Green” energy cabal. Of course they have all the tools necessary to not only pull this off, but to cover it up. They have to be considered prime suspects. Their actions going forward will either give them away or vindicate them. We are watching!!!

The coming months will bring events that make it much clearer as to whom was responsible, and why. In the mean time we should be questioning why British (beyond – LOL) Petroleum is drilling off the coast of the USA! Also… Why is Louisiana one of the most poverty stricken states in the US, while they have all those resources? {source – Jack Blood}

Remembering That The Oklahoma City Bombing Was A False Flag

Posted on

April 19, 1995 was truly a day of infamy. As with so many of the false flags of history, justice has not been served.

Bill Clinton had the first World Trade Center bombing, Muslim group blame, and then the OK City Murrah building bombing, blamed on “lone nut” terrorist Tim McVeigh and the patriot movement. Getting by with these set the stage for the Bush Administration 9/11 false flag.

Remember getting rid of all the evidence in Oklahoma City so as to spare the victims families pain? Just like 9/11.

Obama, being so infiltrated with Clinton ‘pros’, is ripe for giving us the next big one.

The outsourcing for the next false flag has probably begun. Israel comes to mind first and they will have help.

History always repeats.


Timothy McVeigh’s scowling face and orange prison jumpsuit forever changed the way Americans viewed militia members and patriots. But were he and Terry Nichols solely responsible for bombing the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building on April 19, 1995? The answer is a resounding no.

In retrospect, OKC was a precursor to the 9-11 attacks six years later; and the similarity between these tragic events is chilling. Both were acts of state-sponsored terrorism; both utilized pre-planted explosives (i.e. controlled demolitions); and both set-up convenient patsies to take the blame. source


General Benton Partin gave an early report on this attack.

In 1995, the internet was so primitive that I got most of the information from shortwave radio ‘Patriot’ talk news. Parton was a fairly regular guest on these shows.

Bomb Damage Analysis Of Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building

Around the noon hour, Channel 4 had as their guest Dr. Randall Heather, a terrorist expert. Dr. Heather stated: “We got lucky today, if you can consider anything about this tragedy lucky. We have both of the bombs that were defused at the site and they are being taken apart. We will be able to find out how they were made, and possibly who made them. These bombs are very sophisticated high explosives with maybe a little fertilizer damped around them.”
Citizens monitoring police radios heard the following conversation on the morning of the 19th: First voice: “Boy, you’re not gonna’ believe this!” Second voice: “Believe what?” First voice: “I can’t believe it; this is a military bomb!”
When J. D. Cash, a journalist writing for the McCurtain County Gazette,, tried to interview members of the Bomb Squad, Fire Department and Police, he was generally told by potential interviewees, “I saw a lot that day, I wish I hadn’t. I have a wife, a job, a family, I’ve been threatened, we’ve been told not to talk about the devices.” {more}

WRH has several classic articles on OK City.

Were there additional explosive charges and additional bombers?

A brief overview of the official story of the Oklahoma City bombing:

On April 17, 1995 Timothy McVeigh reportedly picked up a 20-foot Ryder truck from Elliott’s Body Shop in Junction City. The truck was filled with roughly 5,000 pounds (2,300 kg) of ammonium nitrate, an agricultural fertilizer, and nitromethane, a highly volatile motor-racing fuel-a mixture also known as Kinepak or ANFO (ammonium nitrate/fuel oil).
At 9:02 a.m. on April 19, 1995, the truck exploded in the street in front of the Alfred P. Murrah federal building. About 90 minutes later, McVeigh was stopped by an Oklahoma state trooper for driving a vehicle without a license plate, who then arrested him on a firearms charge. Two days later he was charged in the bombing. His friend Terry Nichols was arrested in Kansas, and formally charged with the bombing on May 10.

There are many problems with the official story of the bombing. Let’s start with McVeigh’s whereabouts on April 17.

McVeigh had been filmed by a security camera at a nearby McDonald’s 24 minutes before the time stamped on the truck rental agreement, wearing clothes that did not match either of the men seen at Elliott’s.
There is no plausible explanation of how he traveled the mile and a quarter from McDonald’s to the rental agency, carless and alone as he claims, without getting soaked in the rain.

The three people interviewed agreed John Does 1 and 2 were dry. According to Stephen Jones, who has seen the interview transcripts, it took 44 days for the FBI to convince the car rental agency owner that John Doe 1 was Timothy McVeigh. And in the end they did not dare put him on the witness stand, for fear of what might happen under cross-examination.

There is also an unanswered question with regard to the truck, namely what was the Army doing with a Ryder Truck just before the Murrah blast?

Ryder Truck IN Army Compound

The Murrah Building Cover-up (literally)

The minister who married my wife and I was in OK City right after the Murrah Building bomb(s) exploded, and he volunteered to help dig for survivors. He told of three very odd occurrences. In the first, he was required to show his ID six times before being allowed to help look for survivors. In the second, he confirmed the stories told by others that men in suits and ties were literally stepping over the wounded in their haste to gather up files and certain other items in the debris.

Lastly, and the oddest story of all, he told of more men in suits and ties taping plastic sheeting over portions of the building wreckage! The plastic sheeting used was very thin, could not possibly provide any mechanical support for the covered items, and seemed to serve no other purpose than to conceal the wrapped object from view. This story has also been confirmed by other witnesses.

Finally, a photo surfaced which confirms this story (see right).

Note at the very right edge of the photo a large piece of the building covered in shiny black plastic, partly obscured by the flat piece of floor leaning against it. Note the ladder to get a sense of the size of the covered object.

The CNN Reports of additional bombs.

PROOF there were additional explosive charges

Did agents bungle US terror bomb?


The attack claimed 168 lives and left over 800 people injured.

19 of the deaths were children.

The false flag perpetrators used the children to intensify the effect.

The image of firefighter Chris Fields removing Baylee Almon from the rubble of the once standing Alfred P. Murrah Federal government Building won the Pulitzer Prize in 1996.

The photo was taken by Charles Porter who was a 25 year old amateur photographer.

Live footage from News Networks on the OKC bombing
Parts 23 45

Oklahoma City Bombing Was An Inside Job By the Criminal, Banker Run U.S. Govt.
Parts 23

Oklahoma City Bombing What Really Happened
Parts 23

The Forerunner to 9/11: The Oklahoma City Bombing
Parts 23456

OK City Police Officer Terrance Yeakey “suicide”

Conspiracy Files – Oklahoma City Bombing

Coverup in Oklahoma

The most direct precedent to the 9/11/01 attack was the Oklahoma City bombing. In both case most of the damage was produced by hidden explosives but blamed on a diversion. Consider this comparison:

OKC 1995 WTC 2001
collapse produced by internal explosives internal explosives
collapse explained as progressive collapse progressive collapse
diversion AMFO truck bomb 767 crashes
patsies Timothy McVeih and Terry Nichols Mohammad Atta,
absent during attack FBI and ATF personnel CEOs
evidence handling rubble buried without analysis; surveillance tapes suppressed by FBI steel recycled without analysis; Ground Zero photographs prohibited; Pentagon surveillance tapes suppressed by FBI
legislation passed in wake of Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 USA PATRIOT Act of 2001

McVeigh: The Manchurian Candidate

Interview With The Grand Juror Who Wouldn’t Shut Up: The Oklahoma City Bombing Case

It’s Dangerous To Know Too Much

A Morass of Unanswered Questions

Why Did Bill Clinton’s National Security Council Fund ATF “Experiments” in Building Home Made ANFO Truck Bombs in 1994?

The BATF not only built and detonated these home-made vehicle bombs, they actually set up test surfaces to replicate “four of the most common roadbed types in the United States,” to cause the bombs to function in an environment where the crime scene teams evidently expected to encounter such a device somewhere in America. Furthermore, video footage obtained through these secret experiments is expected to be presented as evidence in the government’s case against suspects Timothy James McVeigh and Terry Lynn Nichols.

The stated intent of the Dipole Might experiments in 1994 includes making videos and computer models to “be displayed in a courtroom to aid in the prosecution of defendants” in vehicle bomb cases, according to government documents concerning the purpose of the project. The exact precedent and purpose of this activity is unclear. ATF agents started blowing up vans and cars in Spring, 1994 at the White Sands Missile Range in order to supposedly collect test data for post-blast forensics computer software packages to be issued out to National Response Team personnel when they respond to truck bombings.

Why the National Security Council would fund such an ATF project, despite the absolute rarity of the crime, has not been explained. The NSC is part of the Executive Branch and evidently mandated the ATF’s funding for Dipole Might in early 1993, shortly after Bill Clinton was sworn in as President.

Count The Coincidences

1.) Although no ANFO truck bomb attacks havc occurred on U.S. soil in more than two decades, just a few months before the OKC bombing, the federal government evidently felt a need for “investigative tools and computer data” on such attacks and actually test fired a few truck loads of ANFO to learn how the crime scenc looks afterwards.

2.) According to the indictment against McVelgh and Nichols, the conspiracy to build, transport and function the Ryder Truck bomb of April 19, 1995 took more than a year to hatch. Much of this conspiracy took place in Arizona, according to the U.S. Attorney. As McVeigh and Nichols were allegedly conspiring to create such a bomb, the government now admits it was actually building, blowing up and photographing ANFO truck bombs, just one state over, in New Mexico, during this same period of time. The purpose of the activity was to insure a smooth Investigation of a crime that had not occurred in more than 23 years, but would amazingly happen within 12 months of the project’s inception.

3.) Of the handful of federal ATF agents who worked on Project Dipole Might, one just happened to be outside the Alfred P. Murrah building on the morning of April 19, 1995, and not only survived the lethal blast, but actually called in the bombing to his superiors, correctly identifying it as an ANFO Lomb. (Before you consider this particular coincidence, also explain whv virtually no other OKC BATF employees were anywhere near their place of employment that morning, and in fact, none were killed or seriously injured in a terrorist bombing the government claims was directed towards them. {more}

Oklahoma City Bombing Witness Linked to CIA

In 2004, a declassified FBI memo obtained by an Oklahoma newspaper revealed the existence of a Southern Poverty Law Center informant connected to the Elohim City operation. “References to an informant working for the SPLC at Elohim City on the eve of the Oklahoma City bombing raises serious questions as to what the SPLC might know about McVeigh’s activities during the final hours before the fuse was lit in Oklahoma City – but which the SPLC has failed to disclose publicly, the newspaper reported.

Additional FOIA documents establish the fact the FBI was working with the SPLC. An unclassified copy of a memorandum marked “From the Director of the FBI” contains several references to an FBI undercover operation at Elohim City before the bombing of the Murrah Federal Building and also mentions the SPLC informant.

“If I told you what we were doing there, I would have to kill you,” Morris Dees of the Southern Poverty Law Center told reporters.

The SPLC has played an instrumental role in attempting to link the militia movement to domestic terrorist activities. {more}

The ADL either had someone close to McVeigh, or the government was tracking him and sharing the information with the organization.

The SPLC Connection to the Oklahoma City Bombing in 1995

Timothy McVeigh Died As A Soldier

30 Unanswered Questions

If the bombing of the Alfred E. Murrah Federal building in Oklahoma City was a terrorist reprisal for the Federal massacre of the Branch Davidians at Waco, why were no BATF or FBI agents injured? Why was EVERY BADGE-CARRYING FEDERAL AGENT absent from work at nine o’clock on a weekday morning, their offices staffed only with civilian clerical workers. {more}

Scott Horton Interviews Jesse Trentadue

Jesse Trentadue discusses the journey from investigating his brother’s “suicide” in federal custody to finding the truth about the Oklahoma City bombing, a recent court setback on FOIA requests that nevertheless revealed CIA involvement in the prosecutions of Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nichols, why the FBI must have had foreknowledge of the bombing, security video of the Murrah Building that is suspiciously edited or withheld, current Attorney General Eric Holder’s personal involvement in blocking investigations of Kenneth’s death in 1995 and how the OKC bombing is used by Democrats to browbeat militia groups and score political points. {more}

Attorney: Oklahoma City bomb tapes appear edited

Kevin Ryan reports that the the leaders of the ASCE team who volunteered to explain the WTC collapses are almost identical to the authors of the OKC Murrah Building report.

Initial ASCE team
leaders (9/14/01)

  • Gene Corley
  • Charles Thornton
  • Paul Mlaker
  • Mete Sozen
  • Other volunteers
OKC Murrah building report

  • Gene Corley
  • Charles Thornton
  • Paul Mlaker
  • Mete Sozen


An independent investigator based in Oklahoma City has made some interesting observations regarding the handling of the crime scene and the crucial evidence.

“Every time we have had a tragedy in this country, whether it’s a pipe bomb going off, whether it’s a plane going down, or a building blown up, in the past, the precedent has been that you go in there and you put it back together piece by piece, even the pipe bombs, to get a signature so you can understand how it was done, who did it, and if they do it again, you’ll know how to catch them, plus you might be able to head it off.

“Well guess what, in Oklahoma City, they’ve violated every one of those precedence rules, and they still are. They are still not doing this investigation properly. Why does it need to be done? In order to find out who did it and how it was done so we can protect people’s lives in the future. By asking for a proper investigation, you get away from all this conspiracy, anti-government stuff that Clinton and Congress and the press have been throwing at everyone that asks legitimate questions, questions that have always been asked before in terrorist activities. But now if you ask, you’re anti-government.” (Pat Breilly, Independent Investigator).

There were many people who vocally opposed the demolition of the damaged federal building; General Partin was one. “I originally tried to get Senator Nichol’s office to get the National Guard in Oklahoma to do an independent investigation because I knew they were lying about what had happened,” he said. “Then I turned out a technical report, this is while the building was still standing, that (report) was delivered to 75 senators and congressmen, trying to get them to take action to keep the building from coming down because I knew they would bring it down as soon as possible to cover up the evidence. A careful examination of the collapsed column bases would readily reveal a failure mode produced by a demolition charge” as compared to damage from a fertilizer bomb. This evidence would be critical in determining the cause of the damage to the building, therefore, General Partin considered it a very urgent matter to delay the demolition of the damaged structure until a careful examination could be made.

Just five days after the release of Partin’s report calling for a thorough examination of the Murrah building, it was demolished. The primary evidence in this “most deadly terrorist attack” had been destroyed by the government.

One knowledgeable investigator said, “I don’t know who did the damage to the federal building, but I do know who is covering it up.” They not only brought down the building, they cleared out the site, they covered the entire site with dirt. They hauled the 200 tons of building wreckage to a landfill and buried the crime scene evidence. Partin further stated, “I was under the impression that it was laid out for further possible inspection, but we went over to the site and there were guards at the gate; we were not permitted to enter. We were told by people at the site that all of the material was buried.” [more}

CIA Aided DOJ Prosecutors in 1995 OKC Bombing Case


‘Secret’ CIA documents withheld in FOIA suit raise more questions than they answer

Questions about foreign complicity in the 1995 bombing of the Alfred P. Murrah federal building in downtown Oklahoma City for which Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nichols were convicted, were disclosed Friday in a ruling by US District court judge Clark Waddoups on a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against the CIA for the CIA’s refusal to completely declassify records it has acknowledged it possesses that pertain to the case.

It is the first indication that the CIA and the Department of Justice (DOJ) worked together in the bombing investigations and prosecutions.{more}


The MSM has some propaganda for the 15th anniversary of the OK City bombing …..

MSNBC marks Oklahoma City Bombing anniversary with ‘McVeigh Tapes: Confessions’ documentary film

The two-hour documentary employs state-of-the-art computer recreations of the interview with McVeigh and his actions on and leading up to the day of the bombing.
It also provides biographical background of McVeigh’s life and the path that led to his transformation into an ‘American terrorist.’{more}

MSNBC video Part 123

‘This Week’ Transcript: Former President Bill Clinton

The only point I tried to make is that when I went back and started preparing for the 15th anniversary of Oklahoma City, I realized that there were a lot of parallels between the early ’90s and now, both in the feeling of economic dislocation, and the level of uncertainty people felt. The rise of kind of identity politics. The rise of the militia movements and the right wing talk radio with a lot of what’s going on in the blogosphere now.

And in the right wing media, and with Oath Keepers, the 3 percenters, the — all these people, you know, who are saying things like, “If Idaho wants to succeed from the union,” the militia group out there says, you know, “We’ll back them.” One leader of one of these groups said that all politics was just a prelude to civil war. And then the politicians of course have not been that serious, but a lot of the things that have been said, they — they create a climate in which people who are vulnerable to violence because they are disoriented like Timothy McVeigh was are more likely to act.

And the only point I tried to make was that we ought to have a lot of political dissent — a lot of political argument. Nobody is right all the time. But we also have to take responsibility for the possible consequences of what we say. And we shouldn’t demonize the government or its public employees or its elected officials. We can disagree with them. We can harshly criticize them. But when we turn them into an object of demonization, you know, you — you increase the number of threats.{more}

Relaxing on Air Force One after the 1996 elections, Bill Clinton told a pool of reporters that he owed his political revival to the Oklahoma bombing.

Former President Clinton said he sees parallels in the mood of the country now and on April 19, 1995, when the bombing of a federal building in Oklahoma City killed 168 people while he was in the White House.

“There’s the same kind of economic and social upheaval now,” he told CNN’s Wolf Blitzer in an interview to air Friday on “The Situation Room.”

“Then, you had the rise of extremist voices on talk radio. Here, you have a billion Internet sites,” Clinton said.

And although the hard-core, anti-government radicals are still a minority, “they can communicate with each other much faster and much better than they did before. The main thing that bothered us since the time of Oklahoma City was that already, there was enough use of the Internet that if you knew how to find a Web site — and not everybody even had a computer back then, but if you knew how to find it, you could learn, for example, how to make a bomb.”

“Now, everybody has got a computer; Web sites are easily accessible. And you can be highly selective and spend all of your time with people that are, you know, kind of out there with you,” he continued.

Clinton said the Oklahoma City bombing — then the worst terrorist attack in U.S. history — was the “last in a series of very high-profile violent encounters” during the 1990s between anti-government activists and authorities.

In an interview with the New York Times on Friday, Clinton warned of the affect that angry political rhetoric might have on antigovernment radicals like Oklahoma City bomber Timothy McVeigh; he pointed to Rep. Michele Bachmann calling the Obama administration and the Democratic Congress “the gangster government” at a tax day Tea Party rally on Thursday.

“They are not gangsters,” Clinton told the newspaper. “They were elected. They are not doing anything they were not elected to do.” {more}

Sorry Mr. Clinton, the government is full of gangsters and you were one of them and now along with your wife continue to support the crimes and lies.

Real justice would have you in prison today for your role in the OK City bombing. And that would be just the tip of the iceberg.

Forty Years Gone and Hendrix Still Lives

Posted on

As I always say … “sometimes, everyone needs a little diversion.”

Today the Hendrix family released yet another remixed and remastered gem from  the Jimi archives titled “Valleys of Neptune.”

Having just listened to it, I’ll just say that the forty year wait has been worth it. There’s nothing really new to those who have heard all of the Hendrix official and bootleg releases but the sound quality is very good and as much as I hate to support corporations like Sony, ‘Neptune’ is highly recommended.

It’s still better than 99.9%  of the rock music being put out today.

For the conspiracy minded, there are the tales that Hendrix was murdered.

The Murder of Jimi Hendrix

He didn’t die from a drug overdose. He was not an out-of-control dope fiend. Jimi Hendrix was not a junkie. And anyone who would use his death as a warning to stay away from drugs should warn people against the other things that killed Jimi—the stresses of dealing with the music industry, the craziness of being on the road, and especially, the dangers of involving oneself in a radical, or even unpopular, political movements.

COINTELPRO was out to do more than prevent a Communist menace from overtaking the United States, or keep the Black Power movement from burning down cities. COINTELPRO was out to obliterate its opposition and ruin the reputations of the people involved in the antiwar movement, the civil rights movement, and the rock revolution. Whenever Jimi Hendrix’s death is blamed on drugs, it accomplishes the goals of the FBI’s program. It not only slanders Jimi’s personal and professional reputation, but the entire rock revolution in the 60’s.John Holmstrom. “Who Killed Jimi?”more at Alex Constantine’s Blacklist

Jimi Hendrix murder theory ‘plausible’ say ER doctor

Hendrix murdered by his manager, says former aide

Jimi Hendrix was murdered by the CIA video

Related:  Inside The LC: The Strange but Mostly True Story of Laurel Canyon and the Birth of the Hippie Generation

A white patsy to distract us

Posted on

Better keep an eye on that neighbor of yours. You know, the one with an AK47. Jihadists come in all sorts of flavors these days….. ‘Ringleader’ Daniel Boyd

Conspiracy to murder, kidnap, maim and injure persons abroad.” “The men do not appear to be connected to any larger terror group or any plot against U.S. targets.”

How nice of them to not want to kill anyone here in the states.

Boyd and some of the others traveled to Israel in June 2007 intending to wage “violent jihad,” but returned home without success.”

Israel is a tough place for a white terrorist I suppose. And how with his alleged past history and being under federal surveillance was he allowed entry?

An informant, yes there’s always an ‘informant,’ has been providing information to authorities on this white jihadist for years.

I wonder why the arrests come at this moment?

The first thing that may come to mind is to divert attention away from the rabbi/government mafia mob crimes in New Jersey and Israel.

There are many other crimes, schemes and scams that should be a focus of our attention but the media would rather play up the old Islamic ‘terrorist’ threats.

Greg Bacon gives us some of the “Yes We Can” agenda that government and mainstream media would rather we not talk about.

“Yes We Can”

Keep illegally spying on people, using the same tactics developed by GW Bush and Cheney.

Keep the illegal and immoral wars against Iraq and Afghanistan going and start another against Pakistan.

Keep assassinating people around the world who stand in our way of global conquest.

Keep shoveling tons of money to our buddies on Wall Street.

Keep silent about the trillions of dollars the Federal Reserve is giving away to its friends.

Keep plans for safe energy stalled while we push for the construction of over 100 nuclear plants.

Keep torturing prisoners in Gitmo and at other secret torture facilities.

Keep the health insurance companies making 400+ billion a year by denying care.

Keep hiring Wall Street lobbyists and tools to run federal agencies.

Keep providing the Apartheid state of hate Israel, with billions of dollars of weapons and billions of dollars of money.

Keep plans for bombing Iran on schedule.

Keep Muslims captured overseas in prison indefinitely without charging them with anything.

Keep letting Wall Street flunkies head the SEC so as to not interfere with the ongoing theft of pension funds and retirement accounts.

Keep using manufactured ‘boogiemen’ like Iran, N. Korea and the Taliban to keep Americans scared out of their wits.

Keep our borders open, flooding this country with millions of illegal immigrants to help keep down wages.

Keep ignoring pleas and calls for a truly independent 9/11 investigation.

Keep telling lie after lie and filling Americans with fear and paranoia. {source}

As if ‘domestic terrorists’ aren’t enough, there’s still that swine flu issue. But to keep your mind on more important things like jihad, do not, I repeat DO NOT read this Mike Adams piece on the Ten Things You’re Not Supposed to Know About Swine Flu Vaccine. It might distract you.

And be sure not to go to There Are No Sunglasses where Peter Chamberlin focuses on the US wars of aggression in the middle east. It could be very distracting.

And never, ever go to any of the other blogs and websites listed on the right of this page and for that matter any alternative news sites and blogs. Distraction after distraction.

Just turn on Fox, CNN, MSNBC, ABC, CBS, they’re all pretty much the same, and get the news you are fed/led to believe.

Because, as Chris Matthews says, if you listen to those conspiracy nuts, you have “psychological problems.”

The Conspiracy Business and All That Jazz

Posted on

From Incogman

Now, we all should know something is up. Doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure that one out. In fact, I consider those who blow it all off as hogwash as fairly naïve (which is a nice way of saying blithering idiot). Something’s going on — you can just sense it. Plus, if you know some of the more unmentioned, but factual history of the last hundred years or so, and are not blinded by PC, you’ll be able to spot it. Some call it ”hiding in plain sight.”

I once read (or think I did) this one particular quote and I’ve looked for it a lot in the past, but just can’t find it anywhere. I think it was from Machiavelli, but I don’t know for sure. So I’ll just rewrite it and call it my own:

“It not WHO they talk about that’s in charge, but who they DON’T talk about, that are the real powers that be.”

Just who don’t they talk about? If you simply watch TV (woe unto you), read between the lines a little and make mental notes on what they seem willing to discuss and what they don’t; you can get some sense of it. Make note how they slander any racially awakened Whites, White patriot communities of any sort, or use tin-foil hat ridicule tactics on left-winger, but still PC 9/11 truthers, since they might get too close to the real deal. Which, ironically enough, is the true raison d’être behind “PC” in the first place.

Be sure to read the rest Here