media lies

Shocking and disgusting is in the eye of the beholder … and the controller

Posted on Updated on

I see that  IranContraScumDid911’s main youtube channel has been suspended for 2 weeks for a 9/11 video deemed too shocking and disgusting.

Shocking is a now relative reaction that’s being genetically modified out of our consciousness  but disgusting still holds some sway in our collective semi-awareness.

What little disgust there still is about 9/11 is misdirected by the 10th anniversary media blitz toward everything but the truth.

Surprising, almost shocking, is that Fox News is airing live the boss’s corruption hearing apparently without commercial interruption. Good for a ratings jump the Murdochs (Morlocks?) must have decided.  The first words scrolling across the screen was from Sir Rupert, “I was misled.” That’s pretty funny coming from someone whose sole purpose is to mislead people. I think I read son James’ lips whispering to daddy “if Casey can walk, so can we.”

The houses of prostitution in competition with the News Corpse empire must be salivating. Disgusting behavior they’ll be saying although I would think they are somewhat worried about their own skeletons in the closet that are rattling around  and making too much noise for comfort. The Murdochs may be the worst of the worst but only by a few degrees.

It’s probably too much to ask to turn off their channels. We’re too titillated by what disgusts but there is one thing we can do. Don’t buy anything they advertise. Cut off the income.We don’t need a thing they have to sell … including the lies they call ‘the news.’


Murdoch and 7/7

Posted on

larger image

The sixth anniversary of the false flag of London, 7/7,  becomes the day that the Rupert Murdoch crime syndicate gets a slap in  face and shuts down one of their ‘flagship’ mind control rags for the masses to try and save themselves some trouble. Hacking the phones of the the ‘bereaved relatives of the victims of 7/7’  is only the tip of the iceberg.

Coincidence? Karma? Theater? Maybe the numbers have meaning?

Murdoch has said allegations News Of The World staff hacked phones and paid police were “deplorable and unacceptable”.

Note to Rupert: Deplorable is what you are.  It’s what you pay your employees to be. It’s what you are paid to be. They sad part is that some people actually buy your trash and call it news. But a few less buy it today than they did yesterday.

The empire of lies is falling … one piece at a time. That’s good news.

When CNN Comes to Town

Posted on

CNN and Soledad O’Brien once again puts Murfreesboro Tennessee in the spotlight with more on the mosque debate/diversion/psyops with a Sunday night, March 27 showing of  “Unwelcome: The Muslims Next Door.”  

“We focused on both sides,” said CNN’s Soledad. 

I doubt that Soledad will put very much focus on who funded the court action against building the mosque. Connecting the dots in this divide and conquer saga reveals zionist necon manipulations. Frank Gaffney and the Center for Security Policy played a role. ‘Christian’ zionist groups chipped in. I’m sure other zionist led organizations had a hidden hand in the money and maneuverings but kept a very low profile. The mosque opposition lawyers refused to talk about who is paying them.

CNN even has an “educator and student guide” with before and after viewing discussion questions. No questions though on how this story is a classic example of social engineering and manufactured enemies for neverending war.

In her interviews with the duped and disturbed mosque and Muslim opponents, Soledad  passed on the opportunity to ask them these questions …

Don’t you folks know that 9/11 was a false flag orchestrated by criminal elements of the U.S. government and the Israeli Mossad with great assistance from all of the main stream media in the deception and cover-up, including my very own CNN? Why can’t you understand that it wasn’t Muslims that attacked us, that it was an ‘inside job?’ Doesn’t that make your Islamophobia and mosque opposition a moot point?

Soledad likes her job so she won’t deviate from the official line  Contrived sensationalism sells. It’s what Soledad and CNN do.

More background on the Murfreesboro mosque story.


The complete CNN video … part 1234

And now back to our regularly scheduled dangerous vitriolic rhetoric

Posted on Updated on

It seems like the terms vitriol and vitriolic have been used more in the last 3 days than in the rest of history combined. Perhaps that’s an exaggeration but you know the media, once a word catches on it is used repetitively until we’re sick of it. Sort of like anti-semetism.

Everyone with a political axe to grind or a propaganda angle to push is trying to make use of the Gabrielle Giffords mass shooting. Blame this one or that, words incite, words can kill. We’ve heard it all before but this event really gives an opportunity to push the envelope for censorship and more. In the end this is not about quieting the controlled left/right politicians, their media shills and misguided followers. It is about shutting us up … you and I.

Already there’s a call to introduce legislation that would make it a federal crime to use language or symbols that could be perceived as threatening or inciting violence against a federal official or member of Congress.

Just how specific would that law be and who would have the say so on what inciting violence is? Would violence actually have to occur or would this be more in the realm of ‘thought crime?’

Would calling Joe Lieberman a traitor, Lindsey Graham a war whore or questioning that a majority of Congress are controlled or blackmailed by AIPAC, Wall Street and the mega-corporations be inciting? How about saying that the entire Congress and many federal officials are complicit in covering up the 9/11 black op? It could be dangerous just talking about how the Congress and federal officials have blood on their hands for allowing the lying wars to continue or how they get on their knees waving tons of money before Israel and supporting the genocide and land theft of Palestine. Words could trigger loons to act and it would be all your fault.

Mostly it’s about inciting fear. Fear to speak out. Fear to call those in power the applicable names they so well deserve. Fear to try and expose the criminal activities in government.

It’s not about the “in the crosshairs” symbols of Sara Palin. It’s about the symbolism of “we” who are dangerous because we ask the questions.

The traitor of the day award goes to Glenn Beck who amazingly uses the Giffords incident to lead into how he’s always been right and who is number one on his list of people with dangerous thoughts … truthers.

Yes, number 1 in his “A Recipe for Danger.”

“I have told you on this program that we are facing a danger and I, on this program, have highlighted certain things. I’ve told you that there are people out there that I think are dangerous that actually believe that 9/11 was an inside job and that George Bush was responsible for wiring it up and blowing up the world trade center. I think some of those people are nuts.

I think some of them are dangerous.

I have told you that the government would so discredit themselves that those things would start to make more and more sense and people would say, you know what, I don’t even know if I believe in the moon landing anymore.”

I was surprised that Beck didn’t equate truthers with holocaust deniers but he did throw in these other gems; “He {Jared Loughner} thinks George Bush was behind 9/11,”   “19 hijackers who took down the world trade center in the name of Allah,”   “My agenda is the truth.”

transparent bullshit …

vitriolic rhetoric …

It makes you want to get up and smack the TV.

Tripping with Al-Qaeda

Posted on Updated on

For 9/11 week, HBO will premier Lawrence Wright’s documentary exploration of modern terrorism “My Trip to Al-Qaeda.”

Wright of course is an elitist shill for the ‘official’ tale of Al-Qaeda, radial Islam and 9/11 and the author of The Looming Tower : Al-Qaeda and the Road to 9/11.

Not having HBO I will probably never see this documentary and that’s actually a good thing. No doubt it will be full of the same old lies that we have become accustomed to.

But it’s interesting that sometimes in interviews even the best of the propaganda masters let things slip out that give insight to certain people and events.

NPR in promoting Wright and HBO’s agenda had an interview with him where he had this to say about Osama Bin Laden’s brother in law Jamal Khalifa.

TERRY GROSS: So, one of your best sources was bin Laden’s brother-in-law, the late Jamal Khalifa. He was murdered or assassinated. And you say he understood bin Laden better than anyone. He had married bin Laden’s favorite sister. What are some of the insights you got about bin Laden from talking to his brother-in-law?

Mr. WRIGHT: Well, Jamal Khalifa was a delightful person. He had a wonderful, light sense of humor. He was always kidding. But at the same time, he was very earnest. And, you know, he had fought in the jihad with bin Laden. He was a high school teacher. You know, he had a very charismatic way about him.

And all these likeable qualities made me realize why bin Laden liked him. And in a way, through my own response to Jamal Khalifa, I could sort of identify an element of bin Laden’s personality that actually it was a little uncomfortable to me because I could see the human side of al-Qaida. I could see why people might be drawn to bin Laden because of the nature of his friend.

GROSS: Did he defend jihad to you?

Mr. WRIGHT: He defended jihad against the Soviets. But he, not only to me but publicly, distanced himself from bin Laden, and he actually asked me if he could talk to the FBI to clear his name. And I said I knew a lot of FBI agents, and I would try to set that up.

So I did try and tried for actually several years. And I was finally told by a source that the FBI was forbidden by the CIA to actually make that contact with Jamal.

GROSS: Which side do you think killed him?

Mr. WRIGHT: Well, his family thinks that U.S. Special Operations killed him, and I don’t know that that’s true. But nobody was arrested in that killing, and it was ostensibly a robbery, but all that was taken were his computers.{more}

So if what Wright says here is true, it seems as if Jamal was a CIA asset long after the Afgan-Soviet war, just like Osama was. The CIA couldn’t have Jamal talking to the FBI. It might jeopardize their hidden operations so they killed him.

“Khalifa was arrested in America, in Jordan, and after 9/11, in Saudi Arabia, and on each occasion was eventually released.”

aangirfan: A History of Al Qaeda

Georgian TV Pulls a "War of the Worlds" Scam

Posted on

Georgia’s zionist pro-government Imedi TV creates a hoax that Russia has invaded them and that President Saakashvili is dead and causes a panic.

A test to gauge the potential of mass hysteria through media manipulation? Yes, it still works.

Orson Welles would be proud.

Also: Hoax News: Russia attacks Georgia, Saakashvili killed.

Glenn Beck to Rick Perry ~ "Rick, I think you and I could French kiss right now."

Posted on

Where some of the more ‘normal’ media whores would just high five their allies after they complete a hit on an opponent, Glenn Beck likes to talk about french kissing a partner in crime, Texas governor Rick (Friend of Zion – Mr. Mandatory HPV vaccine) Perry.

“He’s a damn handsome man, looks good in a pair of jeans” Beck and his gay talking sidekick said.

I don’t know much about Debra Medina, the republican alternative candidate for Texas governor running against Perry and Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison but she seems to be a libertarian, a states rights advocate and a good person. Considering her rivals, she is a welcome fresh face.  According to polls she was gaining ground. That is until today.

She made a big mistake and went on the Glenn Beck radio show. In an attempt to possibly gain some votes, I suppose she was just too naive to think that Beck, the Perry and Palin ass kisser, would be fair and objective and not have an agenda to shut her momentum down.

Early in the interview, Beck took intimidating jabs at Medina repeatedly asking her about her background in an attempt to throw her off balance. It was clear from the beginning that Beck had no intention in gathering information as he would not allow Medina to finish her sentences and clearly was not listening.

What became obvious later in the interview was the question that Beck was holding in the back of his mind which would score the necessary points the portly pundit craved. He then asked Medina if she was a “911 Truther”. This was a clear attack on Medina’s association with Ron Paul who has many followers who question the myriad of unsettling discrepancies regarding the events that took place on September 11, 2001. This was the perfect opportunity to relegate a viable grassroots candidate into the arena of “fringe”.

Medina’s answer was appropriate.

“I don’t have all of the evidence there, Glenn, so I’m not in a place, I have not been out publicly questioning that. I think some very good questions have been raised in that regard, there are some very good arguments and I think the American people have not seen all the evidence there, so I have not taken a position on that.”

Perry must have been working with Beck because he immediately attacked Medina and twisted her words.

Gov. Rick Perry is dismissing a suggestion from a Republican primary rival that the U.S. government was involved in the 9/11 terrorist attacks.

Perry said GOP candidate Debra Medina’s remarks Thursday “were an insult to the thousands of Americans who lost loved ones.”

Perry countered that anyone “should be ashamed” for suggesting the administration of former President George W. Bush played a role in the attacks. Bush was Perry’s predecessor as Texas governor. 

The rest of the compliant media jumped all over the story. 

Then Medina makes another mistake. She issues a statement saying that she’s not a ‘truther’ and proceeds to give the same old bullshit line, “Muslims did it.” She should have left it alone.

I was asked a question on the Glenn Beck show today regarding my thoughts on the so-called 9/11 truth movement. I have never been involved with the 9/11 truth movement, and there is no doubt in my mind that Muslim terrorists flew planes into those buildings on 9/11. I have not seen any evidence nor have I ever believed that our government was involved or directed those individuals in any way. No one can deny that the events on 9/11 were a tragedy for all Americans and especially those families who lost loved ones.

Here’s the last bit of her response to Beck’s interview and it was all that she needed.

The real underlying question here, though, is whether or not people have the right to question our government. I think the fact that people are even asking questions on this level gets to the incredible distrust career politicians have fostered by so clearly taking their direction from special interests instead of the people, whether it’s Rick Perry and his HPV mandate or Kay Hutchison and voting for the bank bailout. It is absolutely the right and duty of a free people to question their government. Texas does not need another politician who tells you what you want to hear, then violates your liberties and steals your property anyway. I fully expect to be questioned and to be held accountable as Governor, and that’s the underlying issue here: should people be questioning their government. And the answer is yes, they should be. {source}

Beck and his cronies at Fox must still be laughing. They’ll be back slapping and french kissing each other all night long as they revel in their power to earn their blood money by manipulating and crushing those who don’t toe the neocon line.

What’s really sad is that 9/11 was a government sponsored false flag and even the most well meaning politicians are scared to death of facing the truth and speaking out about it for fear of losing votes from the brain dead population.

Bye bye Debra … we hardly knew you.