multiculturalism

Arson at Murfreesboro TN Mosque Construction Site

Posted on Updated on

The psy-ops of the Muslim mosques is not just for New York. Locally, the issue of construction of a mosque is taken to another level as someone sets fire to excavation equipment at the site. Dumb media and politician manipulated redneck bigot arsonists or paid provocateurs? Either way, the manufactured controversy heats up. 

From Channel 5 News …

Murfreesboro, TENN. – Agents from the ATF, the Nashville branch of the FBI, and investigators from the Rutherford County Sheriff’s Department are seeking the public’s help in solving an overnight construction site fire at the future home of a Muslim Mosque.
Eric Kehn, spokesperson for the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms in Tennessee and Alabama, told NewsChannel 5 Saturday evening that investigators are actively pursuing any and all leads this weekend. Kehn stopped just short of calling the fiery assault on four pieces of giant, excavating equipment and vehicles a hate crime; rather, Kehn said it’s being pursued and prosecuted as a fire at the site of a future house of worship.
Call it what you will, but local Muslims are truly frightened and taking the attack quite seriously.
“The members of the community are very scared,” said Camie Ayash, spokeswoman for the Islamic Center of Murfreesboro. “As I mentioned, it’s Ramaadan. We try to come together as a community in the evenings to break our fast together. Our attendance level has been very low, because people are scared to leave their homes.”
Ayash is quick to point out that Muslims have quietly co-existed in this community for 20 years. Only since plans were unveiled to build a brand new Mosque, at the intersection of Bradyville Pike and Veals Road, has such public opposition become so loudly expressed. {more}

Feds investigate fire at Murfreesboro mosque site – The Tennessean

Fire Strikes Future Site – DNJ

Can you spot the odd one out?

Posted on Updated on

Saturday, September 13, 2008

Phaedrus

Difficult, isn’t it? The reason for this difficulty is that no character really stands out here, for the simple reason that they’re ALL odd! This photo comes from the long-running New World Order children’s TeeVee show: ‘Sesame Street’ and when the format was originally conceived almost 40 years ago, this is the manner in which its Jewish designers envisaged how a future pluralistic, multicultural, utopia might appeal to the minds of children. Note that no two characters are the same; everyone’s kinda different – ‘diverse’ you might even say – and consequently there’s no conformity within this creepy little microsociety.

Nevertheless, there is ONE character that’s different for a very good reason and we shall see which it is as we strip away the distractions provided by all those colorful weirdos that make him that much harder to spot.

For example, check out this next shot. And the one under that, too.

Can you NOW see who the odd one out is? You SHOULD be able to now, because said character (known as ‘Count Von Count’ from the series) has been stripped away from his colorful companions and is now juxtaposed between members of respectable, homogenous groupings. He thus becomes far more readily identifiable by virtue of being totally out-of-place. His individuality is now exposed by virtue of everyone else’s respectable conformity. Those of us who are familiar with Sesame Street will know that the arithmetically-inclined ‘Count’ is the mathematician of this long-running series, who loves to show the children basic number theory. In fact it is reckoned that the inspiration behind the Count Von Count character was a real Jew called Leon Druckmann who died in the mid 1950s in New York with a fortune in gold coins under his bed, whilst insisting to his neighbors and everyone that knew him that he hadn’t a single penny piece to his name in whole world.

So what are we to infer from this little glimpse into the world of children’s TeeVee? The most obvious lesson here to be learned is that – quite apart from any other reasons (of which there are many) – Jews seek to set about promoting multicultural societies where people are encouraged to dress and adorn themselves absurdly and buy into bodily self-mutilation in the form of piercings and hideous tattoos, so as to form a loud and chaotic backdrop behind which the Jew is less readily identifiable. Thus sheltered, he may go about his dubious dealings without attracting unwanted attention from those who might otherwise discover him and out him for what he is. It is simply SO much nicer for the International Jew to be able to stalk the planet and feel at home anyplace his ideas have been adopted, rather than to wind up in a monocultural country like Norway for example, where all the residents are normal, fully-functional, healthy and decent. That must be the worst nightmare for any member of the Stateless Tribe to encounter, when hoping to find acceptance in yet another country.

Will our taxes replenish the coffers of Lehman Brothers?

Phaedrus is well aware that there are discussions (supposedly) taking place right now between Lehmans and a consortium led by Bank of America, to try to salvage this, the fourth largest Jewish investment bank in the US from the all-out collapse it so richly deserves.

However, the fact remains that should such a private buyout rescue deal fail, then once again (illegally) the Government may wind up shelling out our hard-earned tax-dollars to prop up this miserable, monolithic monument to craven greed and stupidity, when the average American home-owner enjoys no such safety net. Curious, isn’t it? Typically, in a normal country with some degree of social insurance, it is the poorest and most at risk that enjoy such protection. Only in the USA can it apply the other way around and provide a safety net for the super-rich. How utterly perverse!

This is, as regular readers who have informed themselves will know, unmistakably indicative of Jews calling the shots over the wishes of hard-pressed American people. The “Entitled Ones” whose Holy Book tells them that WE (you and me) are only put here as beasts of burden for their exploitation; we have no property rights and must render up to the Jews everything we own when called upon to do so. That is their Talmudic belief and we have to suffer lawmakers on Capitol Hill who appear perfectly happy to go along with this twisted belief system, too.

So if the current rescue talks fail and Bush says, “Lehman Brothers is just too big to be allowed to fail; we gotta support it.” then you will know that YOU are going to foot the bill for it. Not only YOU, but since we’re already in debt up to our eyeballs, your children, your children’s children, and your children’s children’s children! America’s Jews have got everything sown up REAL tight! They certainly ARE enslaving us all, just as their so-called Holy Book predicted.

The Death of America By A Thousand Cuts

Posted on

Incog Man

Some people, who might stumble upon this blog, will immediately dismiss it all out of hand as nothing but mindless Jew-bashing and conspiracy nonsense, not really possible — we all know that no conspiracy could exist with a minority that looks just like us or is secretly managed in such a necessarily large scale way. It’s just too impossible.

Whites think all this and because of it, look with doubt about any Jew talk. But it’s never, ever been that way; that’s not what’s being done to this country by the regular Jews. What people don’t understand is that many of them are killing this country in small, incremental ways — it’s death to this country by a thousand cuts as the Chinese might have called it.

People always say “I know this Jew next door, so-and-so seems like a nice enough guy.” Sure, he’s probably just fine. The funny thing is the logic here: Americans have always been susceptible to the Jew liberal propaganda line because of an idea virtually enshrined in American heads: One, that you can’t judge all of a certain people, just by a few bad apples. Here, the Jew neighbor turns this concept completely around in a White person’s head and says “I know a nice one and since he’s alright, then the rest have to be the same way.”

Nothing, NOTHING, could be further from the truth and it doesn’t work that way, logically. Think about the TOTALITY across the board. What many of them have done and are doing to this country right now, as we speak.

This country was founded on the principal “E Pluribus Unum” Out of Many, One. It was “assimilation” that was meant by this, not the purposeful attacks on Whites and the Balkanization of America. If you came here, you were now to act like an American, speak English, support America’s interests and not be some special X person, who does anything for some foreign land, ANY foreign land. Period.

The Jews have not signed on to this concept. For them — anywhere – it is always Israel and Jews, first, and the country they just happen to live in, last. The idea of America doesn’t work this way — it never has and never will. Imagine if Italian Catholics did this kind of thing? Think people, if the Catholic Opes Dei had the kind of power in Washington as the Chabadist-Lubavitchers do, don’t you think people would get a mite concerned? You would, too for good dam reason. It would be non-stop outrage about it!

Jews often seem totally oblivious to anyone saying something against what they want in the world. It’s like we don’t exist. And if we do happen to get their special attention, it’s usually because they see it as more evidence of us hating them because they are Jews (the eternal victimhood biz) or that we just hate any non-White person. Not anything about what they are doing and saying and agitating for. The whole matter of their activities and behavior is completely left by the wayside, it’s now us who are the evil Nazis!

You probably heard nothing about it, but in 1991 the Jews managed to have a law passed by Senator Richard Gephardt, that says the United States of America was FOUNDED on the Seven Laws of the Talmud; not the Old Testament Ten Commandments that Jews always work to have removed from public places – just like any symbols of Jesus Christ that the Seven laws prohibit (Idolatry). Think about it!

Leibler

Isi Leibler

Take the immigration issue. If you vigorously fight against the US becoming a Third World country, these Jews want to turn you into a goose-stepping Nazi or sheet-wearing KKK Klansman.

Yet immigration of non-Jews is completely ignored for them when it comes to the State of Israel. These Jews often come right out and say Israel is only for Jews, but still say White countries have to be Multicultural, regardless of what the people in these countries want. Isi Leibler (right) is one such arrogant Jew, director of refugees and immigrant services of the NY-based Hebrew Immigration Aid Society. He’s behind pushing Multiculturalism in the country of Australia, but goes and tells a Jew newspaper:

“Multiculturalism has no place in Israel. Israel was created as a Jewish state for the Jews.” Read more here

Can you believe what total hypocrites these Jews really are?

The Anti-Defamation League (ADL) is up to the exact same thing. It’s been non-stop in attacking ANY Americans who are against immigration, illegal or otherwise. Isn’t this group supposedly to protect Jews? Why are they so adamant about allowing non-Whites into this country?

Read the rest: http://incogman.wordpress.com/2008/09/08/the-death-of-america-by-a-thousand-cuts/#more-3103

The Fallacy Of Multiculturalism Revealed

Posted on

By Curt Maynard

I recently came across a college students essay on the Internet and it’s entitled “Multiculturalism: The Subdividing of History.” Originally written in 1991 the essay affords us an opportunity to look back at how this process developed over time.

The author, Julie Ann Kessler, then a senior at Ashland College, a mid sized teaching institution in Ohio, presents her thesis in a typically dry and academic format, but manages to immediately highlight a curious fact about “multiculturalism,” something that was much easier to recognize and admit to fourteen years ago than it is today.

Today many of us are under the erroneous impression that “multiculturalism,” was designed to encourage tolerance by bringing together members of our society through the celebration of diversity ­ in fact the entire “multicultural movement,” has been divisive from the beginning
Ms. Kessler acknowledges this fact in her first paragraph:

No debate within higher education is more divisive than the one being waged between self-proclaimed “multiculturalists” and those who could be called traditionalists in the study of Western culture.

You’ll hear many people exclaim today that Jews were the initiators of this divisive agenda, and then you’ll immediately hear these people referred to as anti-Semites for daring to suggest such a ridiculous hypothesis. However, Kessler pointed out in 1991 that Racism and Sexism: An Integrated Study a treatise by the Jewish Paula Rothenberg was described in Newsweek as the “primer,” for multiculturalists. It is so easy for time to wear away the foundation of uncomfortable facts.

Kessler rightly points out that originally there were two schools of thought within the “multiculturalist movement,” one, the “particularist,” tended to emphasiz that “the experiences of one ethnic group can’t have any relevance to members of another,” which is nothing more than Boasian “cultural relativity,” repackaged for modern consumption. According to Kessler, the other school of thought, “pluralism,” “hold[s] to an all-inclusive American history, with an accent on shared experiences.” What Kessler realized at the time was that both paradigms are essentially integral parts of the same puzzle, i.e. multiculturalism, and both challenged the “traditionalist” view.

We see this type of dichotomous argument often in American intellectual thought, an alleged division in ideology, but just under the surface a common agenda. More often than not one of the theories is presented in such a way as to appear to be more acceptable than the other, something Kessler also notes:

Pluralists in essence say, “American culture belongs to all of us,” as opposed to “American culture belongs to us whites.” The particularists, on the other hand have turned this old, exclusive view on end: “American culture does belong to whites; so celebrate your ancestral homeland instead of your present home. Ethnic and racial differences must be accentuated and hatreds fanned.

What we know fourteen years later is that “multiculturalism,” won the “fixed,” debate, the particularist and pluralist views merged and have left us with a singular idea, American culture does not belong to whites and ethnic and racial differences should be accentuated and hatreds fanned, except where and when whites are concerned. This wasn’t an accident; this was the intention all along, something else that Kessler prophetically revealed in her analysis of something that happened at Stanford University in 1988 when the clarion call “Hey, hey, ho, ho, Western culture’s got to go,” initially went out.

Kessler notes how the very unlikely example of a Guatemalan female Marxist that renounced marriage and motherhood in the pursuit of the Marxist ideal was used to inculcate impressionable young minds, when she cites the fact that Stanford students were encouraged to read I, Rigoberta Menchu a book about exactly that and how that book was supposed to sensitize the students in such a way that they might “understand the perspective of female Marxist Guatemalan peasants of Indian ancestry, not to examine whether the book is valid or contributes to a student’s education.”

Kessler reveals a good bit of skepticism in 1991, which proved to be quite healthy in that after receiving the Nobel Prize in 1992 Rigoberto was exposed by the New York Times as a fraud. In her memoirs she notes that he brother had died of malnutrition, but a Times reporter found him alive and well, and living prosperously in Guatemala. Not unexpectedly, because central to the thesis of multiculturalism is “white oppression,” Rigoberto claims that her impoverished family was subject to intimidation and oppression by “wealthy landowners of European descent.” Unfortunately for Rigoberto, her fellow villagers claimed that the “dispute was really a land feud that pitted Rigoberta’s father against his in-laws. It was a family quarrel that went on for years and years.”

This comes as no surprise to some of us, those who read and embraced I, Rigoberta Menchu in the 1980s however might be somewhat taken aback as the Nobel Prize and her fraudulent memory still stand despite these revelations. Another interesting aspect of this story is that the same people at the Times who initially built up Rigoberto’s image in the 1980s were the same ones that exposed her as a fraud in the 1990s ­ possibly a matter of reminding a prima donna that what can be built up can also be broken down.

Kessler continues by highlighting some of the more meaningless infighting within the multiculturalist perspective, i.e. the “pluralists” refer to the “particularists,” as “extremists,” and the latter believe the former to be unrealistic. Sensational accusations are passed back and forth as though they have some meaning; in actuality they don’t. As an example one black professor and advocate of the “pluralist perspective,” refers to a Jewish professor of history at Columbia, and “particularist,” Diane Ravitch, as “the ultimate, supreme, sophisticated, debonair racist” and a “Texas Jew.” Ravitch then exposes the entire dichotomous scheme when she “readily admits, pluralism easily can be, and has been, transformed into particularism. In its concern to include everyone in a new common American history, to be nice to everybody and not leave anyone out, pluralism may well give rise to cultural divisiveness where none might otherwise exist.”

Exactly the point, what is indeed rare though is that a senior at Ashland College in 1991 saw through the smoke and mirrors of theoretical multiculturalism, but perspectives like hers were never voiced publicly.

There is no longer any doubt, multiculturalism is a dismal failure as evidenced by the fact that tens of thousands of Americans have signed up voluntarily as part of a popular movement to patrol our nation’s borders because our government refuses to do so. It is also quite clear that American society has reached the point where it will no longer silently serve as liberalisms experimental model; it has reached the point of total saturation.

Interestingly, failed liberal models have been quite common over the last one hundred years. They also tend to be extremely destructive and are almost never exposed to any subsequent scrutiny. The common denominator is that they almost always tend to be Kosher, developed and propagated by Jews. The reason they are never exposed is because Jews have monopolized the massive power and influence of the media, whether that be television, newspapers, news magazines, cinema, or through the equally cornered market of academics, American Universities and the publishing houses that provide these Universities with textbooks. For example one learns through the aforementioned mediums that the Bolshevik’s employed the concept of collectivization on Russian peasantry with disastrous results. We may also learn that the concept and process of collectivization was subsequently exported to China, North Korea, Cambodia and other Asian nations, but we will never hear that the failed process which led to the deaths of more than ten million Christian Russians and Ukrainians, also failed in China, failed in North Korea and failed in Cambodia with similar results, the deaths of tens of millions!

“Multiculturalism,” is nothing more than the newest failed “liberal model,” a modern day “collectivization” scheme, an abortive idea that society can’t seem to rid itself of. There were many Julie Ann Kessler’s fourteen years ago vocally opposing what to them was an obviously flawed system, but they were denounced as racists and/or completely ignored. Today the failure of “multiculturalism,” shines as a beacon in all its inglorious ineptitude leaving us the opportunity, and that is what it is, to make the changes necessary to make our country a better place to live in for our children and grandchildren.

Although the concept of “tolerance,” is and has always been an American virtue, the people of this country have been taken advantage of.

America Awake!

Multiculturalism As A Tool To Divide And Conquer


THIS is an incredibly good essay by an American that the Jews have done their very best to discredit and silence, but to no avail, he’ll be remembered forever as a dissident first class, Louis Beam. This particular essay inspired me to write, The fallacy of Multiculturalism Revealed.

Multiculturalism As A Tool To Divide And Conquer

by Louis Beam

No nation is born multicultured. Multiculturalism is an unnatural as well as unhealthy condition that can only afflict states in national decline. A multicultural state carries in it’s geneses the seeds of eventual national destruction.

All multicultural nations will be found to be in a state of political, moral, economic and social decay. Greed and corruption will characterize the government coupled with oppressive measures directed against citizens. Lies and deceit will be stock and trade of media, politicians, and educational institutions. Such are the bellwethers of a multiculturalist advent.

In modern times multiculturalism is instituted from the top down as an elitist ruling class tool used to play one or more racial or ethnic groups against another. The ensuing cultural melee serves the political designs, economic goals and power needs of elitist rulers and their sponsors. This technique was developed by Marxist ideologues who used multiculturalism in Russia to divide and conquer resistance to the institution of a communist state. The end result of their successful takeover was the murder of thirty million humans in the Soviet Union alone. Many more elsewhere.

The same internationalist cabals who sponsored Lenin, Trotsky, and Stalin as the multicultural leaders of the Soviet state from their banking houses in New York, similarly sponsor the multicultural leaders of the United States, Canada, and Europe today. An interlocking network of foundations such as Ford and Carnegie, international banking empires such as Rockefeller and Rothschild, and government agencies firmly in their control work in tandem with controlled propaganda outlets such as the New York Times, CBS, and Hollywood, to promote, foster, and institute multiculturalism today. While the examples used in this essay deal primarily with the United States the same process with the same methods is being employed elsewhere. This of itself is prima facie evidence of a cabal which promotes multiculturalism as a tool to achieve its objectives.
Read the rest HERE
http://curtmaynardsblog.blogspot.com/