population reduction?

Conspiracy of the Week – Joseph Moshe and the Ukraine ‘Plague’

Posted on

Everyone likes a good conspiracy tale.

art by David Dees…..Rense

The edwardlong808 videos of Moshe’s arrest in LA…..

Moshe called into the Dr True Ott Show on Republic Broadcasting and said he was a microbiologist who wanted to hand over evidence to a States Attorney regarding tainted H1N1 vaccines being produced by Baxter pharmaceutical. He claimed that that Baxters lab in the Ukraine was in fact preparing a bioweapon disguised as a vaccine. He maintained that the vaccine contained both adjuvants designed to weaken the immune system, and replicated RNA from the virus responsible for the 1918 global pandemic. Thats it. He made no threat against Obama, nor said anything about bombs or any attack.

Dr. Bill Deagle disclosed a story that occurred August 11-13 in Los Angeles involving Joseph Moshe, a bio-scientist with a dual USA/Israel citizenship.

LISTEN to Bill Deagle discuss the Moshe incident on Project Camelot Radio. The complete interview is here. {much more at information farm}

From Rense on Aug. 15…Bizarre – Mystery Man Claims Baxter Flu Vax is BioWeapon

American Everyman had a good report on Aug. 24…Who is Joseph Moshe?

All of that sets the stage for what the reports say is a flu/viral pneumonia ‘plague’ in the Ukraine.

Hype to get more to take the vaccination? A scare tactic psyops? Some semblance of truth that’s getting hard to cover up? Maybe it even goes deeper than we can fully understand at this time?

Some observations, opinions, and most likely some disinfo…..

Edgar J. Steele at The Peoples Voice…One Flu Over the Ukraine’s Nest

Has Baxter Released a BioWeapon in Ukraine

Recombinomics statistics and commentary 11/4/09

Swine Flu, Mystery Virus Or Pure Hype: What is Going on in the Ukraine?

Was Ukraine Flu Epidemic Predicted by Joseph Moshe?

What Might Be Spreading in the Ukraine??

Ukraine virus mystery deepens

Ukrainian Flu is not just H1N1

Swine Flu Fears Grip Ukraine – NY Times

The latest report from the World Health Organization.

It’s a strange tale indeed….We’ll see how it plays out….


Bedford Springs, Bedford Pennsylvania Death Cult and Child Sacrifice Fraud

Posted on Updated on

Tuesday, August 05, 2008

Roberts Court

Celebrating the Dred Scott decision at Bedford Springs, Bedford, Pennsylvania, a secret Republican elite society associated with the Bohemian Grove and Skull and Bones Societies are planning to re-establish child sacrifice ceremonies at a secret springs location in Bedford. These pro-Nazi death cults have been secretly active for decades and are now coming out as the ruling elite. The worship of the pagan god Mo-Loch is central to the child sacrifice ceremonies according to Skull and Bones experts.

Republican Sex Cult, Bedford, Pennsylvania

View the YouTube video on Eugenics: The “Science” of Bigots requires a Dumbed-Down Population.

Activists from truthaction.org have obtained the official guest list for Bohemian Grove’s 2008 midsummer encampment along with a map of the Grove’s facilities. According to the guest list, this year’s attendees include George H. W. Bush, David Rockefeller, Henry Kissinger, Donald Rumsfeld, Colin Powell and several former CIA directors. Also attending are two members of the Grateful Dead, one of whom is camping with the elder Bush. During an action at the entrance of the elite retreat, several 9/11 truth information packs were accepted by Bohemian Grove campers and taken into the grove, including one by former CIA Director James Woolsey’s bunkmate.

Bohemian Grove members are attempting a totalitarian coup over the Constitution of the United States which has been secretly advanced since 1947. By building an elite-cult or “Sun King” where the over-whelming majority of Americans are conditioned to trust their federal government and their media from cradle to grave, such a cult is then able to commit horrific and inexplicable acts like the terror attacks on 9/11, massive child trafficking within the U.S. and atrocities of eugenics in the U.S. and around the world. This coup requires a massive number of mind-slaves or marionette slaves created by Monarch Mind Control. According to Bohemian Grove experts, the child sacrifices at Illuminati centers are necessary political theatre for the death cult practitioners. Approximately 3,000 children per week are made into mind-slaves for Pentagon and Illuminati purposes. All of this activity is held in utmost secrecy.

• Massive fraud in Children and Youth Services in Pennsylvania and most other states is on-going for the purposes of trafficking children for the elite. This fraud includes massive federal welfare MOE, TANF and CCDF, CAPTA and other federal funds being used to traffic children. Most of this fraud requires severe civil rights violations of parents and children and a perverse “science” of eugenics.

• The active demonization of 25 million non-custodial parents in the United States is now on-going in false courts as the CIA has advanced the Skull and Bones “science” of eugenics by the full manipulation of the Psychological Industrial Complex over the past 50 years through massive “truth” funding operations.

• 9/11 False Flag terror attacks on the American people was advanced to build the 911 Mind Control Matrix for absolute reversal of the United States Constitution.

• Millions of Mind Slaves were produced with Nazi Germany Mind Control methods over the past 50 years. See the Mind Control Conspiracy over the U.S. Constitution.

• Notice that all “evidence” of foreign terrorists being involved in 911 carefully circumvents real courts in order to reduce the power of these courts to expose the truth. Can you think of a better coup over our Constitution than this “invisible coup?

• The “free” press of the U.S. never told you about the Bush Family coup attempt in 1934 or the “Trading with the Enemy Act” charges against Prescott Bush in 1942 or the massive, illegal manipulation of the CIA of your media, universities and corporations over the past 50 years. We have only been force-fed massive amounts of dis-information, none of which serves the truth! Full exposure of this massive fraud must now take place! See the Bush family Links to Nazi Mind Control and Eugenics.

• Reversal of the centuries’ old role of parents for sex education, parental over-sight and parental authority is now actively violated against millions of non-elite children in order to set them up for mind control tricks, HIV/AIDS infections and massive eugenics family dysfunction. Hundreds of thousands of bureaucrats are now totally brainwashed as marionette police and social workers advancing the “science” of eugenics, destroying millions of American families through massive welfare fraud.

• The full perversion of science at the hands of CIA death cults will not stand! Millions of Americans are taking action against the totalitarian assault on their Constitution and the American family!

Questioning wrongful authority in your federal government may just save your life. Do so by researching the massive amount of evidence that suggest such agencies as the FBI and the CIA actually serve an extra-constitutional elite and not the U.S. public. There are now decades of hard evidence to prove this. They have been deliberately set up as an absolute authority Sun King so that we cannot effectively see the truth. They then are empowered to drive a highly illegal Mind Control machine against us. This is “see no evil” programming of millions of Americans over several decades. See the Sun King programming that will utterly destroy our Constitution.

Given the devastation in the Middle East which flowed from this tragedy, should we not all be calling for a new investigation? If we do not, does the evidence not highly suggest that we will be at risk of being called complicit in the development of a ruthless regime by future generations?

By understanding Mind Control, you will begin to understand how “patriotism” can be used so profoundly against you. You will experience a profound loss of rights, extreme financial hardship and total demoralization. These are now fully programmed, more war, a depression, absolute reversal of our Constitution and it’s all obvious! When will Americans wake up?

911: The Real Matrix of totalitarian Mind Control

MKULTRA Mind Control now used against Americans

We now have top experts to explain how and why these massive buildings were “pulled” for full Mind Control effect on 911

Listen to Rep. Dennis Kucinich July 8 phone call regarding whistle-blowers and Impeachment

View Improbable Collapse: the demolition of our Republic

View the Mind Control Conspiracy now ruling America

In 1981, William Casey, then director of the CIA, said with confidence, “We’ll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false.”

Bush Dissolves the Constitution: Absolute Crime, Absolute Silence

No, I will not comply!

Mike Ruppert on our vanishing Constitution, New Police State

The Great Conspiracy

The 911 Inside Job

911: The Great Illusion

Those who are destroying our Constitution while we sleep!

Active Child Trafficking in America

Scholars for 911 Truth and Justice

Journal of 911 Studies

911: Programmed Horrors that are Obvious Lies

The Truth about the Federal Reserve

The Monarch Worm: CIA Programming now used against American Children

The Programmed Killers that Shape the Nation

One Million U.S. Children will Suffer from Active Sexual Repression Programming

MKULTRA, Monarch Mind Control

Active Population Control Agendas in America

Republican Sexual Repression Cults

Gang Stalking Methods used against Fathers

Republican Dirty Tricks regarding Comprehensive Sex Education

Illegal Sexual Inquisitions now routinely destroy non-Republican families

How Political Bigotry is Programmed into Children

Eugenics and the Republican Elite, Where have the Elite gone?

The Scientific Method Applied to 911 Propaganda

Social Engineering Agenda: How it works

Corporate Mind Control and Child Trafficking Profits

Republican Sex Cult, Bedford, Pennsylvania

CIA, Big Pharma Drugs designed to Pacify Reason and Critical Thinking

Government Databases on your Family, the Quaker “threat

CIA implants in Americans

Rape-kitting of Children for effective Mind Control

AIDS as Biological Weapon

Harvard Children targeted for Sex Investigations

The Creation of New “Sub-Humans

The Real Unabomber, Not so Uni

Controlled Breeding for Politics

How the Child Trafficking Industry Began

Symbols of the New World Order in America

CPS Corruption Unveiled

Pennsylvania is the worst violator of parent and child rights as it has by far the highest number of child-trafficking organizations. Children are violated by cyborgs, programmed by the “bahavioral sciences” of the elite and not by the Constitution. German children are the most prized by the elite, and Pennsylvania’s high German population is the most exploited population for the making of the child mind-slave.

Now the president has absolute powers to round-up all Americans through bogus terror attacks and inoculate them. That literally means a third-generation Nazi can round up your kids and inoculate them with drugs from the same companies that worked with Hitler. The truth is far more interesting than any fiction. Parents have a constitutional right to raise, educate and protect their children in historical truth, sexual truth, build sexual objectivity and sexual values so that their children are not easily manipulated by obvious Nazis and conspirators against our Constitution. Step up to our Constitution or step out!

Why are “thousands” of US service men and women getting sick and dying from mystery “vaccines” given to them by the military? Why isn’t there a record of this, and why can’t they get any answers to help them get well? And why do all those people with yellow ribbons on their car not raise hell over this? “Support the Troops” means SUPPORT the troops … and that means demanding answers, and help, for these people. There is no excuse we have 200-400,000 veterans living on the streets every night, or that they’re being used as guinea pigs by this intolerable military-pharmaceutical complex. With anthrax in the news, perhaps we better look beyond that and see what other biological warfare is going on. Given the long history of biological experimentation on our military members, it’s beyond time we give this due diligence and demand some truth!

Sexual repression in group dynamics has been actively studied and advanced by Tavistock and the CIA for purposes of “crowd control,” and stressing targeted groups. These sexual repression “tricks” have utterly destroyed the black family in America and are actively employed to demonize millions of political enemies of the Nazi elite. Nazi Mind Control agendas actually target the most advanced child rearing methods used by the elite themselves. Since 911, top experts in this area have been harrassed and murdered or died very mysterious deaths. There is a direct link between these killings and Nazi Mind Control. Those cowards in the legal community who sit by as an entire generation of children are conditioned to become Nazis through sexual repression are indeed the most negligent and dumbed-down lawyers in history.

Our secret government is very active in the dumbing-down of our children so that Mind Control mechanisms will easily work on them. Nowhere is this more evident than in pre-school parental sex education where the most advanced sex education methods in the world are being savagely attacked by redneck Nazis. They deliberately promote fear, bigotry, disinformation and wrongful authority over parents that serves the Pentagon and secretive eugenics operations. “Family Courts” today are being exposed as the elitist eugenics courts conceived by the Rockefellers and other top American Nazis. 25 million non-custodial parents are the results of obvious eugenics false courts. These highly secretive psychological warfare methods are no longer secret and justice will be served!

We know sexual repression builds a more militant society, destroys families and that it is actively advanced by our authoritarian government for many nefarious reasons. These eugenicists require a dumbed-down, simplistic worldview and they cannot tolerate the sophisticated populations for which our Founding Fathers required. This form of warfare builds hysteria, ignorance and wrongful authority in select groups, serving to make marriage and family impossible in select groups and serving an obvious eugenics function. The parent is then blamed for the resulting hysteria and this conspiracy allows wrongful government to advance sexual inquisitions against parents and traffic in their children who are the true victims of secret government social engineering. This is Nazi law, not constitutional law.

Illegal sexual Inquisitions are felonies against rights, felonies against children, obvious felonies against good parents. All parents have the fundamental right to protect their children from obvious felons! Parents who raise their children with sexual awareness and sexual objectivity are elite parents raising elite children. The federal government even tells them how to do it. The Nazi inquisitions advanced by Tavistock and their American counterparts in the non-elite world of Child Services are conspirators against our Constitution and are fundamentally unconstitutional. All children are elite children deserving elite parents! These Nazis are all around you and are the true idiots. Wake up and take action against obvious Nazi eugenics!

Femi-Nazis love to inflate sexuality in children. It gives them power and purpose by avoiding the obvious: children are naturally sexual and need to communicate and be educated and empowered about sexuality. Educated children become “elite” children who are not so easily manipulated by Mind Control devices employing shame, sexual hysteria and family dysfunction by the imposition of a more primitive mind. These bureaucrats have been made profoundly idiotic about human sexuality and political manipulation. They must be utterly destroyed in a real court of law! They only do this to “non-elite” children. The elite empower their own children in the precise manner that the non-elite children are being trafficked as “abused” and deliberately traumatized by Femi-Nazis. Wake up to the fact that population control and wrongful authority requires total ignorance about human sexuality and power. These are active eugenics programs our Founding Fathers would never tolerate in America.

Learn the truth about the coming VCHIP and Take Action

Source: http://robertscourt.blogspot.com/

Ignore this missive from our downbeat doctors

Posted on

Frank Furedi

Painting by Pablo Picasso

The British Medical Journal’s insistence that people should have fewer children speaks to our misanthropic, Malthusian, baby-fearing times.

We live in a culture that finds it increasingly difficult to value life. So it isn’t surprising that even the prestigious British Medical Journal (BMJ) has published an editorial calling on doctors to advise their patients to have fewer children.

According to the authors of the editorial – life-long Malthusian Professor John Guillebaud and Pip Hayes, an Exeter-based GP – not having children is ‘analogous to avoiding patio heaters and high-carbon cars’. Newborn babies are a danger to the environment, they argue, and although they rhetorically state that ‘we must not put pressure on people’, pressure is exactly what they want doctors to exercise as part of this new Malthusian crusade.

‘We are not criticising those people in Britain who had large families in the past, because a lot of people had no inkling about the sustainability implications’, Guillebeaud informed the UK Guardian (1). In fact, as a hard-line Malthusian zealot, Guillebeaud has been criticising people who breed ‘too much’ for a very long time. All that has changed in recent years is the packaging of anti-natalist arguments.

In the past, Malthusians warned that overpopulation would lead to famine. When that argument disintegrated, they said overpopulation would undermine economic development. Later they claimed that overpopulation might assist the spread of communism, and more recently they have argued that it aids terrorism (lots of poor young men with no jobs apparently leads to apocalyptic violence).

Now they have latched on to environmentalism and the widespread concern about humanity’s impact on the planet. What we have today is a new form of joined-up scaremongering, where the traditional fear of human fertility is linking up with anxieties about what humans are doing to the Earth.

Literally scared of babies

King Herod’s fear of the newborn was confined to one baby. Today’s misanthrophic fear merchants have a far bigger target in their sights. One Australian professor of obstetric medicine, Barry Walters, believes the survival of the planet requires stringent controls on the number of children parents can have. He argues:

‘Anthropogenic greenhouse gases constitute the largest source of pollution, with by far the greatest contribution from humans in the developed world. Every newborn baby in Australia represents a potent source of greenhouse gas emissions for an average of 80 years, not simply by breathing, but by the profligate consumption of resources typical of our society. What then should we do as environmentally responsible medical practitioners? We should point out the consequences to all who fail to see them, including, if necessary, the ministers for health. Far from showering financial booty on new mothers and thereby rewarding greenhouse-unfriendly behaviour, a “Baby Levy” in the form of a carbon tax should apply, in line with the “polluter pays” principle.’ (2)

Throughout history, different cultures have celebrated birth as a unique moment, signifying the joy of life. The reinterpretation of a new birth as ‘greenhouse-unfriendly behaviour’ speaks to today’s degraded imagination, where carbon-reduction has become the supreme moral imperative. Once every newborn baby is dehumanised in this way – represented as little more than a professional polluter who is a ‘potent source of greenhouse gas emissions’ – then it becomes difficult for people to read the BMJ editorial without nodding along in agreement.

If the birth of a baby is regarded as an unnecessary and unacceptable burden on the carrying capacity of the planet, then it’s only a matter of time before a child’s very existence will be regarded as a threat. One of the distinct features of contemporary environmentalism is its intense suspicion of the human species. Environmentalists’ systematic spread of fear about the ‘human impact’ promotes mistrust of people’s motives, and in the end of people themselves. Going further down this route, the new demands for a carbon tax on fertility means that the defining identity of a newborn baby would be ‘Polluter’.

Subjecting the act of birth itself, that once-celebrated creation of a new life, to the ‘polluter pays’ principle exposes the dark side of today’s misanthrophic imagination.

As potential polluters, babies cease to be those lovely cuddly things that bring so much joy into our lives. Robbing babies of their endearing innocence makes it easier to scare people away from having them – or at least from having too many of them. In recent centuries babies were discussed as a ‘blessing’; now, some argue that they are more of a ‘curse’, especially for the environment.

This reversal in the way we regard human life is explicitly endorsed by the American environmentalist writer Kelpie Wilson. Recently, Wilson presented abortion, not as a necessary option that allows women to determine how they live their lives, but as a sacrifice worth making in the interests of saving the planet. ‘To understand that a tiny embryo must sometimes be sacrificed for the greater good of the family or the human species as a whole is the moral high ground that we stand on today’, argues Wilson. Why? Because ‘we have to consider how we will live tomorrow on a resource-depleted and climate-compromised planet’.

From Wilson’s perspective, abortion is morally justified as a resource-saving strategy. She believes that ‘most women who seek abortions do so in order to conserve resources for children they already have’. Here, scare stories about the ‘physical limits of the planet’ are presented as ‘moral arguments about abortion’ (3).

If even newborn innocent little things are depicted as lifelong addicts to pollution – and if many believe it would be better if they were never born in the first place – then what does it mean to be human?

When life loses meaning

Since the beginning of time, one of the clearest markers of an enlightened civilised society was the moral status it attached to human life – and outwardly, at least, twenty-first century Western society expresses an unprecedented degree of affirmation for human life.

This is an age where the principle of human rights is culturally celebrated and extolled by all of the major political institutions. The phenomenal growth in health expenditure shows how seriously prosperous societies treat human wellbeing. In some cases, Western societies go to extraordinary lengths in their efforts to keep alive a premature baby or to prolong the lives of the elderly and of chronically ill people.

And yet the ethos of human rights and heroic medicine exists at a time when contemporary society also seems estranged from its own humanity. To put it bluntly: it is difficult to celebrate human life if people, or at least the growth in the number of people, are regarded as the source of the world’s problems. In the twenty-first century, the humanist impulse that drove the development of the modern world has been displaced by an impulse that regards humanity with suspicion, if not outright hostility. One of the central themes of contemporary scaremongering is that people should fear themselves and their fellow human beings.

Apparently, there are too many of us doing too much living and breathing. In a world where humanity is portrayed as a threat to the environment and the survival of the planet, the pursuit of human life itself is regarded as a mixed blessing. Consequently, our concern with preserving and improving the quality of life of some individuals sits uneasily with increasingly shrill demands that we should prevent people from being born in the first place.

In previous times, religious leaders would regularly rebuke sinners and threaten them with a fate worse than death. Often people were burdened with the charge of ‘original sin’. Yet despite such harsh regimes of theological authority, religious leaders also recognised people’s capacity for virtuous behaviour. Human life was affirmed as unique and special, and people who behaved according to the Book were assured salvation and the blessing of the Almighty. Many of today’s Malthusians take a very different approach: they find it difficult to find any redeeming qualities in the human condition, and appear driven by a passionate desire to make us scared of ourselves.

There was a time when scare stories warned people about venturing into the unknown – today people are warned about venturing into the known! The demand that we should all stay put is neatly summed up in the recently invented term ‘ecological footprint’. The way in which this term has entered everyday speech shows how normal human behaviour is viewed as destructive. The idea that having an impact on the environment is necessarily a bad thing is rarely criticised, despite its powerfully misanthropic underpinnings. On TV, in cinema and in popular culture, representations of the past frequently suggest that the development of civilisation itself, particularly the advance of science and technology, is the source of today’s problems of environmental destruction and social disintegration. Some environmentalist writers even regard the shift from a nomadic existence to the advent of agriculture as a mixed blessing. Kelpie Wilson argues that ‘suddenly there was a massive population growth in the human species’. This led to friction and war and environmental destruction.

From this perspective, the lifestyles of hunters and gatherers are the most harmonious with nature and the environment. Those old hunter-gatherers got things right, and civilisation only cocked it all up. And since ‘natural hunter-gatherers’ rarely had many children, ‘large families are really completely unnatural for human beings’, argues Wilson. This view of civilisation as an ‘unnatural’ tale of horror and destruction is frequently put forward by the British apocalyptic philosopher John Gray, too. Gray laments the advent of agricultural society 10,000 years ago for helping to create the conditions for human development and civilisation.

The idea that civilisation bears responsibility for the perils we face today assigns a low, undistinguished status to the human species. And the most striking expression of the contemporary loathing of all things human is in the argument that we must significantly reduce the number of human beings in order to save the Earth. As Theodore Roszark wrote in New Scientist in August 2002: ‘There isn’t a single ecological problem that won’t be ameliorated by a smaller population.’

For contemporary Malthusian campaigners, human life has little meaning. Their scaremongering about ‘too many people’ is often based on a genuine dislike of people – especially people who are not like them. Take Paul Ehrlich, one of the best-known environmentalist campaigners against population growth. His classic scaremongering text, The Population Bomb, provides the reader with glimpses of his own feelings towards his fellow human beings. Ehrlich’s account of an evening out on the town with his wife and daughter in Delhi helps explain his fear of ‘too many people’:

‘The streets seemed alive with people. People eating, people washing, people sleeping. People visiting, arguing, screaming. People thrusting their hands through the taxi window, begging. People defecating and urinating. People clinging to buses. People herding animals. People, people, people, people. As we moved slowly, through the mob, hand horn squawking, the dust, noise, heat and cooking fires gave the scene a hellish aspect. Would we ever get to our hotel? All three of us were, frankly, frightened…since that night I’ve known the feel of overpopulation.’[iv]

Those who are frightened by ‘people, people, people, people’ find it difficult to endow human life with meaning. Uncontained by compassion and sentimentality for their fellow human beings, they regard human life as cheap, as having no more value than other species. In this vein, the deep ecologists Arne Naess and George Sessions argued in 1984 that a ‘substantial reduction in human population is needed for the flourishing of non-human life’.

Celebrating non-existence

The idea that there are too many people inhabiting the globe has been promoted in different ways by different people in recent centuries. Since the time of Thomas Malthus (1766-1834), the catastrophic vision of population growth causing the collapse of society has played an important role in outbreaks of cultural pessimism. Back in the nineteenth century, it was predicted that population growth would lead to famine, starvation and death. Today’s cultural pessimists have raised the stakes: they denounce population growth as a threat to biodiversity and the very existence of the planet. Twenty-first century Malthusians are not so much worried about an impending famine as they are by the notion that people simply use too many resources and commodities.

Whereas in the nineteenth century, Malthusians warned that population growth threatened people with starvation, today they denounce people for threatening the planet. That is why contemporary Malthusianism has acquired such an unusually strident and anti-human tone. In the West, the population control lobby castigates those who have large families for being ‘environmentally irresponsible’. Having children, especially lots of them, is treated as an eco-crime. Another human life is simply ‘more carbon emissions’ – which is why it would be better if such lives never existed. As the Voluntary Human Extinction Movement puts it: ‘Humans are too great a threat to life on Earth: they should be phased out.’

Another Malthusian writer argues that ‘a non-existent person has no environmental footprint; the emission “saving” is instant and total’ (5). This obvious preference for the non-existent over the existent shows how far-reaching is today’s anti-human attitude.

The catastrophic imagination that underpins twenty-first century Western culture has encouraged the Malthusian lobby to target the very aspiration for procreation. Controlling fertility is now advocated as a duty rather than a matter of choice. ‘Couples making decisions about family size do so in the belief that it is a matter for them and their personal preferences alone’, says a population control advocacy group, with incredulity (6). The idea that people should have the right to make choices about their family size is today dismissed as an indefensible outrage against common sense. And this assault on the right to procreate often becomes intrusive and coercive.

Consider the example of Rwanda. The world was horrified at the mass slaughter of people that occurred there in 1994, in which more than 800,000 people were killed. Yet as far as the population control lobby is concerned, there are still too many people living in Rwanda. John Guillebaud has argued that people living in Rwanda ‘need one-child families’. With the guidance of Western non-governmental organisations, the Rwandan government is planning a sweeping population-control programme. Accordingly, everyone who visits a medical centre will be ‘counselled’ on family planning (7).

Experience shows that such ‘counselling’ is in reality a medium for putting pressure on women to adopt some form of contraception. In a poverty-stricken, unstable country like Rwanda, where people lack the resources to assume even a modicum of control over their lives, we can see today’s inhumane scaremongering about a plague of people for what it really is.

Frank Furedi is the author of many books, including Population and Development: A Critical Introduction, published by Polity in 1997. (Buy this book from Amazon(UK).) Visit Furedi’s website here.

(1) ‘Doctors’ advice to Britons: have fewer children and help save the planet’, Guardian, 25 July 2008.

(2) MJA * Volume 187 Number 11/12 * 3/17 December 2007

(3) See Kelpie Wilson ‘Abortion and the Earth’, Truthout, 29 January 2008

(4) Ehrlich (1971) p.1

(5) A Population-Based Climate Strategy – An Optimum Population Trust Briefing, by David Nicholson-Lord, May 2007

(6) A Population-Based Climate Strategy – An Optimum Population Trust Briefing, by David Nicholson-Lord, May 2007

(7) See Stephen Kinzer ‘After So Many Deaths, Too Many Births’, New York Times, 11 February 2007

reprinted from: http://www.spiked-online.com/index.php?/site/article/5521/

Post by way of: Strike the Root

Population Control and a World Food Authority

Posted on

Reshaping the International Order Part 5

Brent JessopKnowledge Driven Revolution.com
May 5, 2008

“… it is of utmost importance that an equilibrium be established between the world’s total population and the capacity of ‘spaceship earth’…” – RIO: Reshaping the International Order, 1976 (p124)

The establishment of a World Food Authority to control the food supply of the world is a major goal of The Club of Rome’s RIO report. This issue is intertwined with exaggerated fears of environmental collapse and the elite’s obsession with population control.

The Club of Rome is a premiere think tank composed of approximately 100 members including leading scientists, philosophers, political advisors, former politicians and many other influential bureaucrats and technocrats. This series of articles describes the major conclusions of the 1976 book Rio: Reshaping the International Order: A Report to the Club of Rome [1] coordinated by Nobel Laureate Jan Tinbergen. The RIO report “addresses the following question: what new international order should be recommended to the world’s statesmen and social groups so as to meet, to the extent practically and realistically possible, the urgent needs of today’s population and the probable needs of future generations?”

Part 1 of this series gives an overview of the proposed new international order described by the RIO report as “humanistic socialism”. This includes: collective neighbourhood armies, a fully planned world economy, global free trade, public international enterprises, proposed changes in consumption patterns among other topics. Changes to the financial system including international taxation and the creation of a World Treasury, World Central Bank and World Currency are examined in part 2. Part 3 addresses the redefinition of sovereignty from “territorial sovereignty” to “functional sovereignty” as well as the use of the concept of the “common heritage of mankind” to gain international control of not just the oceans, atmosphere and outer space but also all material and non-material resources. Part 4 discusses the generation of public opinion and the use of white coated propagandists.

The Environmental Scare

From RIO: Reshaping the International Order:

[Italicised text is original emphasis and bolded text is added by author.]

“History has frequently shown that people, in times of crisis and once convinced of the necessity for change, are prepared to accept policies which demand changes in their behaviour so as to help secure better lives for themselves and their children.” – 110

The threat of environmental catastrophe to further the population control agenda is nothing new and continues to this day with the manmade global warming scare. Back in the 1970’s the Club of Rome was not shy at using the environmental catastrophe card to push for population control. Below are some examples from RIO: Reshaping the International Order:

“Moreover, it has been estimated that by 1985 all land surfaces, except those so cold or at such high altitudes as to be incompatible with human habitation or exploration, will have been occupied and utilized by man.” – 89

“Although not yet proven, climatologists are being forced to conclude that our planet has in recent times passed through a period which may well have been optimal as far as food production is concerned. They believe that future decades may well be characterized by extremes – hot and cold, wet and dry – without necessarily a change in average temperature. (4)” – 90

The endnote used to back up this claim is given below:

“(4) There is certainly sufficient evidence for this concern: the Asian monsoons were unsatisfactory for three successive years between 1972-1974; severe droughts in the Sahel and other parts of Africa and the Great Plains area of the United States and Canada in 1974; an unexpected late frost in Brazil in 1975 which may have destroyed as much as 60 per cent of its 1976 coffee crop. The growing season of the best grain producing areas in the Soviet Union is now believed to [be] about a week shorter than it was in the 1950’s; an even more pronounced shift appears to have taken place in the United Kingdom.” – 97

Do these types of arguments sound familiar?

“Much effort has been made in the past ten years, in some industrialized countries, to bring the disadvantage facing many Third World countries to the attention of large numbers of people. If it has met with only limited success, it is probably because it has failed to bring out the concept of interdependence of countries and issues. More attention must in future be focused on information and education on how our planet functions and on the ‘survival fact’ that the claim of the whole is wider and deeper than the claim of any of its parts. There is also a fundamental need to develop a broadly educated political class which is capable of understanding science and the broad implications, possibilities and dangers of technological advance, and which can harness technological advance for constructive social purposes.” – 111

Population Control and The World Food Authority

“… these threats [of food shortage] might well be exacerbated by increasing population pressures and deteriorating climatological conditions.” – 135

“Population control policies carry the important indirect consequence of restricting the supply of unskilled labour, thereby raising its price.” – 73

“If the world is to be liberated from the continual nightmares of hunger and malnutrition, these and the various measures proposed by the FAO [Food and Agricultural Organization] Worlds Food Conference should be implemented to the full and call for the creation of the World Food Authority, with extensive and real powers; or, as a second best, the World Food Council proposed by the World Food Conference.” – 138

“internationally owned and internationally managed [food] buffer stocks…” – 226

“the question of introducing meat rationing should be seriously considered [for developed countries].” – 227

Food as a Weapon

The incredible power that would be accomplished from a massive concentration of food stocks under the control of a single agency did not escape the authors of this report to the Club of Rome. The reigning food situation in the world was dominated by the great dependence of many countries on the North American breadbasket. This gave the Americans a considerable amount of power over their dependent countries.

“the American Secretary for Agriculture who has observed: “Food is a weapon. It is one of the principal tools in our negotiating kit” ” – 29

The further centralization of food stocks under a single international power would only increase the abuse of food supplies not decrease it. This, quite naturally, is the point. The result of this control is well described by Bertrand Russell (who strongly supported this idea) in his 1952 book The Impact of Science of Society [2]:

“To deal with this problem [increasing population and decreasing food supplies] it will be necessary to find ways of preventing an increase in world population. If this is to be done otherwise than by wars, pestilence, and famines, it will demand a powerful international authority. This authority should deal out the world’s food to the various nations in proportion to their population at the time of the establishment of the authority. If any nation subsequently increased its population it should not on that account receive any more food. The motive for not increasing population would therefore be very compelling. What method of preventing an increase might be preferred should be left to each state to decide.” – 124


The final article in this series deals with a variety of issues including global solidarity, regional unions, legal changes and a standing United Nations Peace Force.

[1] Quotes from Jan Tinbergen, RIO: Reshaping the International Order: A Report to the Club of Rome (1976). ISBN 0-525-04340-3

[2] Quotes from Bertrand Russell, The Impact of Science on Society (1952). ISBN 0-415-10906-X

Related Articles

Reshaping the International Order Part 1: What Does a World Governed by Humanistic Socialism Look Like?

Reshaping the International Order Part 2: Reshaping the International Financial Order

Reshaping the International Order Part 3: “Functional” Sovereignty and the Common Heritage of Mankind

Reshaping the International Order Part 4: Reshaping Public Opinion and the White Coated Propagandists

Reshaping the International Order Part 6: A Glimpse into the New Order (May 12)

Also see series on Mankind at the Turning Point: The Second Report to The Club of Rome

Checkmate: Killing us softly with bioweapons?

Posted on Updated on

Tuesday, April 15, 2008

From The Aspen Institute about Lynda Resnick and her husband Stewart Resnick:

“Lynda Resnick began her business career at the age of 19, when she founded a full-service advertising agency. Other successful ventures throughout her career include corporate management, marketing, product development, and most recently, writing. She and her husband Stewart are passionate about all things healthy and Resnick is behind the marketing success of brands such as POM Wonderful, Fiji Water and Teleflora.”

“Passionate about all things healthy.” Maybe the Resnicks should tell that to the hundreds of people from the Santa Cruz and Monterey areas that have signed affidavits stating that their product, Checkmate (Checkmate OLR-F and Checkmate LBAM-F) got them sick, many seriously, when they were sprayed against their wishes last year.

Even with these affidavits and massive public outcry, high-profile lawsuits and city resolutions demanding an end to the spraying, Arnold Schwartzenegger, Homeland Security, the California Department of Food and Agriculture and the Resnicks have decided to use Californians as guinea pigs for this untested, un-approved by EPA, biochemical to see if it will eradicate the light brown apple moth (LBAM).


According to the CDFA they have to spray because there is potentially millions of dollars in damage that might occur to state crops due to LBAM.

That’s right, the state has declared a emergency and the right to spray Californians with a product that has carcinogenic, mutagenic and reproductively harmful ingredients (see Aerial Spraying for the Brown Apple Moth to Resume) based on a possibility that there MIGHT be damage to crops in the near future by this moth.

What this amounts to is that they want to preemptively take out a potential threat before it’s established that it is a threat at all. Doesn’t this scenario sound familiar? Weren’t we told that we had to go into Iraq because we had to act preemptively to take out Saddam’s WMD program before he unleashed a mushroom cloud on some American city? How is the LBAM spraying program any different?

One missing ingredient in the PR campaign is that we didn’t have the dazzling pyrotechnic display of 9/11 to get our blood boiling for vengence. Maybe if the state promoted this innocuous little bug as “Mothra” like one paper factiously did, they could sell this campaign to a skeptical Californian public.

However, LBAM is no Mothra and even the CDFA acknowledges this, stating that so far LBAM has not done any damage to crops. This is significant because according to James Carey, professor of entomology at UC Davis the moth has likely been in California for decades.

So, why the urgent rush to spray an untested, un-approved pesticide on children, grandmothers and people with auto-immune and respiratory problems? What form of insanity could explain such irrational, immoral behaviour?

There are many theories out there as to why the rush to spray. The most commonly heard theory (one held by both sides of the issue) is that this is all about protecting the interests of state’s multi-million dollar agro-business, which is also the official narrative as well. And there is some validity to this point as the LBAM threat is already hurting local agriculture due to import restrictions by Canada and Mexico on the LBAM. But, this just constitutes a threat to the economy by bureaucratic fiat based on irrational fears, not because of some real threat.

Another theory being bandied about is that this spraying is about cronyism and political favoritism. The Resnicks are the owners of Suterra, the company that manufacturers Checkmate, and are among the top 100 campaign contributors to Governor Schwarzenegger, having donated to his coffers an estimated $144,000. It is believed that Resnick will be getting something in the tune of $75,000,000 if the spray program goes through.

So, is the rush to spray just an example of Schwartzenegger giving political/economic favors to his friends? A quid pro quo of the most prosaic kind?

Perhaps, but maybe we should venture outside pandora’ s box into unchartered territory, or maybe we should call it “terror”tory, as that is what the elite do — create threats — real and imagined — trump up the fear (anti-spray activists say that state (company?) goons were coming to the meetings and threatening the audience with visions of massive food shortages should there be no spraying), and then reap the benefits after they provide the solutions. The old Hegelian dialectic at play and we are all pawns in their game. (Perhaps this is the real reason for the name “Checkmate”.)

In the mindset of the elite any crackpot, criminal and psychopathic idea is fair game to contemplate and apply in their Machiavellian worldview, including exposing civilians to biological and chemical weapons, as can be demonstrated countless times in U.S. history (see Humans Used as Guinea Pigs By US Government and Military). Recently Salon.com exposed an Army-run bioweapons exercise in Dead or Alive? in which the Army tried to cover-up the fact that they were using a live bacteria, bacillus subtilis, on unwitting civilians.

So, is it out of the question to ponder if this spraying campaign could have a more sinister agenda to it? After all, the American eugenics movement was funded by major American foundations, foundations that today are major supporters of population control programs. Can we rule out this possibility? (“Here is a good summary of an evil “whitewashed” out of our history books Eugenics and the Nazis — the California connection)

This brings us to the Resnicks and The Aspen Institute, to which both husband and wife are members. Other notables members include Madeleine Albright, Richard Armitage, Prince Bandar bin Abdul Aziz, and Brent Scowcroft, just to name a few of the many political movers and shakers in the organization. (see list)

It is significant that Brent Scowcroft is on the list as he is the author of the secret (now declassified) paper NSSM 200, “Implications of Worldwide Population Growth For U.S. Security and Overseas Interests,” which provided insight into U.S. government plans for population reduction internationally. He linked these plans to goals that have very little to do with alleviating human suffering, and everything to do with the maximization of profit.

And, who can forget ex-Secretary of State Madeleine Albright’s quote about the death of more than a half million Iraqi children due to U.S. sanctions: “I think this is a very hard choice, but the price — we think the price is worth it.” (60 Minutes, 5/12/96)

Worth it to whom, Madeline? Your New World Order overlords?

Besides having such unsavory membership, the Aspen Institute is also principally funded by Rockefeller and Carnegie foundation money (See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aspen_Institute), which were two of the mayor funders in the eugenics movements in the U.S. and Nazi Germany, and today big supporters of population control programs.

So,this brings us back to that unsavory third hypothesis. Could the LBAM spray program just be a cover for some sinister eugenics or depopulation program? After all, why is the spraying slatted to happen in heavily populated urban areas? Cities to be sprayed this summer are San Francisco, Oakland, Emeryville, San Leandro, Tiberon, and other heavily-populated Bay Area communities — communities that one would not in any stretch of the imagination be called agricultural lands (though one might call them unfriendly to our global overlords). Since these moths have a mobility range of 20 to 40 yards it is a patently absurd notion that they have to spray urban communities to protect agricultural crops.

Anti-spray activist and Santa Cruz resident, Rami Nagel, speculates on this theory as well. He writes:

“Apparently the CDFA or the USDA, or both, decided that the previous chemical formulas used, Checkmate LBAM-F and Checkmate OLR-F were not good enough, which really points to the fact that the past two aerial sprays in Monterey, and the one in Santa Cruz County, were a waste of time and money. Not to mention the tragedy of the many severe health reactions experienced by thousands of people from chemical exposure. It doesn’t matter to those in charge at the CDFA, EPA, or USDA, if a new chemical is needed to be used, because the goal is not to stop the moth, the moth cannot be stopped, it can only be controlled. This is known. The goal may be to coat people with a toxic mesh of disease causing microcapsules.

The chemicals that were sprayed, and that are planned on being sprayed, have not undergone thorough safety evaluations. And they won’t undergo such evaluations in a legitimate way, because if they did, they would prove only one thing – that these chemicals are potentially deadly.

The chemicals planned to be sprayed will no doubt be similar to the ones used in Santa Cruz and Monterey Counties in 2007. They are a plastic encapsulated microtechnology, a microscopic plastic dust. The reported microcapsule size of the aerial mating disrupter is as small as 10 microns and averages 25-35 microns in size for an undeployed moth spray. For comparison, a human hair is approximately 70 microns in thickness. The size of these chemical containing plastic balls comes suspiciously close to micro-sized particles that are used to evade the body’s defensive systems for biological weapons, those are reported to be 3-4 microns in size. Miniature particles between 2.5-10 microns in size, especially from pesticides, are known to cause both short term and long term health effects, including decreased overall life span.”

— Plan To Spray Toxic Biological Chemicals Over San Francisco Announced

Okay, so maybe Rumi and this author might be a little paranoid, but why shouldn’t we speculate on the motives of this program? After all there is a history in this country of secret biological warfare programs carried out on unsuspecting Americans.

It’s unpalatable, but plausible.

But, even if we choose to less conspiratorial but conventional in our thinking all we have to do is look at the stupid and criminal spraying of DDT, Agent Orange and Malathion to know that these spray campaigns can have disastrous results.

There is also the question of the legality and the the will of the people being subverted. To quote Rami Nagel:

“This aerial spraying violates several state, federal and international laws. It violates the right to personal safety given by the California State Constitution, the very document that creates the California government. It violates the Americans with Disabilities Act, which protects people with chemical sensitivities and other disabilities from discrimination. It violates the Federal constitutional right to personal liberty. It violates the EPA’s laws against spraying pesticides on people. It violates human rights laws that say that human experimentation without consent is unethical and immoral. It violates criminal laws that claim it is a crime to poison children, or anyone else. It violates pollution laws to spray a toxic substance over plants, animals, and waterways. It violates laws against organized crime and it violates the very tenants of our democracy; a system of government designed to represent the people, not to poison the people to represent private agri-business interests.”

Governor Schwarzenegger Backs Aerial Biochemical Spraying That Harms Children

What this spraying program constitutes is a de facto biological weapons program against the people of California. And, if they can get away with it here you can bet it will be open warfare on the rest of the country. It is imperative that Californians stop it now.

Here are some thing you can do to stop the spraying.

Ask your congressmember to support A.B. 2892 Voter Consent by Assemblymember Sandre Swanson (Oakland, Alameda, Piedmont). A.B. 2892 would require the secretary of Food and Agriculture to obtain the consent of two-thirds of the registered voters of the cities and counties affected by applications of pesticide if the pest eradication zone includes any urban areas.

You can also boycott all products from Resnick-owned companies. Products include Paramount Agribusiness, POM Wonderful, Teleflora, FIJI Water, as well as the Franklin Mint.

And, definitely call Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger’s office (ask to leave a message for his wife, Maria Schriver, too) to demand an end to the spraying: 916-445-2841 (press #1m #5, #0)

For more information and to get involved, see: