VATICAN CITY (Reuters) – World Jewish leaders told Vatican officials that denying the Holocaust was “not an opinion but a crime” when they met on Monday to discuss a bishop they accuse of being anti-Semitic.
My Catholic grade school teachings are a bit rusty, but I believe that one can commit a sin by commission–actually doing the act–or by omission–only thinking about the act.
Does that mean that practicing Catholics have committed a sin if they had thoughts about the Holocaust™?
And is that a venial or mortal sin? When you go to the confessional, will you be told to pray for forgiveness by saying 5 “Our Fathers” and 5 “Hail Mary’s” or be told to read some passages from the Talmud?
Since Israel and her lackey’s are always using the issue of the Holocaust™ to shut up anyone pointing out that they are murdering Palestinians en masse, does questioning Israel’s ethnic cleansing of Palestine also count as a sin? Or does asking questions about Israel’s murderous campaign against Palestinians only count as a crime?
One can question or even deny the existence of a God, but it’s not a crime. But one can’t ask questions about the Holocaust™?
Will the Holy See issue guidelines on what Holocaust™ questions are a crime and or a sin?
What’s next? Crucifying people for having asked questions about the Zionist version of the Holocaust™?
Holocaust denial is only a crime because the defenders of the orthodoxy are so terrified of an honest and open examination of the issue.
Throughout history, all hoaxes were perpetrated int the context of their own times; what the hoaxer could get away with. When Ramses The Great lied to his people about the battle of Kadesh he did so because in his time, few if any Egyptians had the means to travel to Kadesh (which actually remained under Hittite control) and find out for themselves what happened, and those few Egyptians who did know the truth had no means to get the word out to their fellow Egyptians, who were being brainwashed by the carvings on the temple walls.
But today, because of the ease of travel, and the internet, it is common knowledge that Ramses was male-cow-manuring his own people.
Over the years, many of the claims made regarding the horrors of the Nazi slave labor camps have come under re-examination as new technology becomes available.
As one example, there were claims that the Nazis were making soap out of the dead bodies of their Jewish victims. When the story first surfaced in 1943 as part of a fund raising tour by Russian Jews seeking aid to rebuild Russia, there was no way to verify it. As new science and technology came along, surviving bars of soap were tested and found that far from being made from the fat of human victims, the soap was a typical wartime soap made with very little fat at all. Later DNA tests showed the fat was not from humans, but from pigs (a serious embarrassment to those who had buried bars of the soap in Jewish graveyards).
Then there was the story about the human skin lampshades. This story went that the wife of a camp commandant obtained the skin from the camp’s victims and used it as a crafts material for lampshades, gloves, and so forth. Again, at the time there was no way to verify the story. But as science developed new methods, the lampshades and gloves were found to be made of goatskin, a common craft material of the time.
The there were the claims of mass graves at Treblinka. Over 800,000 victims of the Nazis were claimed to have been buried there. But one of the grave sites abuts a water well, and when testing of the water failed to detect any of the contamination which would result from burying thousands of bodies near a water well (the water should have been lethal to drink), the story was revised to claim that as war’s end, the Nazis had dug all those 800,000 bodies up and cremated them to conceal the evidence of their crimes. Again, as science progressed this story came into doubt as there was no trace of the vast amount of combustion residues which would have permeated the site of such a huge fire. And finally, ground penetrating radar, which certainly did not exist back when this story was first told, proves that the area where the graves are supposed to have existed has never been disturbed. The strata remains as it was laid down by the glaciers during the last great ice age.
Time makes ancient truth uncouth, and as new science comes along it is the normal practice to apply that science to the world to refine, and in some cases revise, what we know of our history. New technologies are being applied to the wreck of the Titanic, to determine what role the quality of metal played in the disaster, as one example. Seeking to know more about what we know is a natural instinct for humans.
Except, of course, in this one area of history. And it is the sheer weight of political force brought to bear to silence those who ask questions which most advertises that there is something being hidden from us all.
There is nothing that is beyond re-examination using new technologies. There is nothing above question. That we only just now learn that Tutankhamen had an impacted wisdom tooth does not bring about the end of Egypt. It’s just scholarship. Even the much venerated Shroud of Turin has been subject to re-examination by science. The results were not as hoped for, but for those who hold truth to be the most valuable commodity we have, the outcome was still positive; we know more today than we knew yesterday.
Frankly, as we watch the political bludgeoning of Bishop Williamson by the defenders of the orthodox account of WW2 it becomes obvious that they are afraid, intensely afraid, which means they KNOW they defend a story which, like Ramses tale of victory over the Hittites, will not survive objective re-examination. Every act, whether it is the jailings of Zundel and Rudolph, the wrecking of academic careers, and now the imposition of Jewish religious will over the Vatican; each and every action is an advertisement that here is a question that cannot be allowed to be asked.
We do not arrest people who think Elvis is still alive. We do not send people who claim to have seen Bigfoot to jail. We do not wreck the careers and finances of those who claim they had sex with little green critters on board a UFO. Only on this one topic is refusal to conform to the ‘revealed wisdom’ so fraught with peril!
Look at where all the cover-ups overlap. Look for that most protected point. Look for that focus where even bitter enemies come together to conceal, and there you will find lurking the greatest lie of modern times; as great a lie as when the Pharaoh of Egypt claimed to have won a war against the Hittites.
Let the truth be told, though the heavens may fall.
Now we see the absurdity of six million Jews who died in World War 1. Now we see the absurdity of there being more holocaust survivors now than there were at the end of World War 2. It goes on and on. We find that the number of six million was being tossed about even before the end of the First World War. No… my friends… the drunken driver in the semi filled with lies is meeting the bridge abutment of the truth and the flaming wreckage blazes on the shoulder of the highway as the rubber necking world drives slowly by.
Freedom of speech online is constantly under attack, but it seems to have been kicked up a notch lately. Over the last week or so, I have noticed many blogs and websites being banned/suspended, and have seen an increase in the level of censorship on message boards and forums.
A few days ago, on the Above Top Secret forum, the site administrators announced to users the “end” of “hate speech” on the forum, specifically in regards to the many threads critical of Jews and the Jewish state of ‘Israel’ following the conflict in Gaza (and though not explicitly stated, probably also regarding the role of the Jewish-controlled banking and financial industry in the ongoing economic crisis). Although ATS has been fairly ‘kosher’ for a while now, they are now apparently scrubbing the forum of any and all speech critical of Organized Jewry, and even so boldly as to use the establishment’s “hate speech” censorship tactic.
Though not a recent development, it is worth noting that virtually all major “conspiracy”-related message boards and forums censor on the Jewish Question. Alex Jones’ ‘PrisonPlanet Forum’, for example, is notorious for censorship of anything critical of the Jewish state of “Israel”, any debate of the HoloHoax, or any mention of Jewish Power in media, government, banking, etc. The same goes for other popular forums such as ‘Godlike Productions’ and David Icke’s Forums.
On ATS, Godlike Productions, David Icke, and other similar “conspiracy” sites, discussion and debate is allowed on virtually any topic imaginable: aliens, reptilians, UFOs, werewolves, vampires, Jesuits, Freemasons, etc. But if you start talking about the power of Organized Jewry or the Holocaust™ Hoax, then don’t expect to be around very long. Your account will be quickly suspended and/or IP address blocked from posting, or even accessing the site.
Clearly, the Jewish power structure and thought police have deemed it important to take control of popular conspiracy/anti-NWO forums and message boards, and kosherize the opposition. The aim is that discussion and identification of Oranized Jewry as the ultimate enemy and powers-that-be will be “discredited”, marginalized, and confined to the “fringes” of the internet (ie, only on “hate” sites and “anti-semite” forums such as VNN and Stormfront).
And as most everyone knows, organizations such as Vanguard News, Stormfront, and Bill White’s American National Socialist Workers’ Party are highly suspicious and most certainly Jewish-infiltrated controlled opposition. Therefore, the only voices allowed to reach the masses with the “anti-Jewish” message will be a few Jewish-controlled false opposition organizations that have already been “discredited” in the minds of the masses, giving the (false) appearance that the anti-Jewish movement is a “completely discredited” and very small “fringe” movement.
Need Protection from the Internet? Joe LIEberman and company have the answer
Since Blogger has been going out of its way to censor pro-Palestinian blogs by shutting them down, they why not shut down these alleged “terrorist” sites? Or am i missing something?
And why do i get the feeling that Joe Boy and his fellow conspirators are more interested in policing and censoring the Internet than they are in protecting Americans from government created and funded “boogeymen?”
The Thought Crime Act, brought to you by that Senator from Israel, Joe LIEberman
What are people like Leiberman, Felter, Silber, Lieter, MEMRI and Rita Katz doing to protect Americans from the Internet?
Senator Joe Lieberman, the US senator representing Israel (I), released on 05.08, the report that will be used to justify the “Thought Crimes Act” law that is setting in his committee.
The report, Violent islamist extremism, the internet, and the homegrown terrorist threat.pdf urges new laws to be passed in the U.S. to combat internet terrorism, by citing sources such as Michael E. Leiter, Arvin Bhatt, Mitchell Silber, the discredited 9/11 Commission Report, our friends at MEMRI, Rita Katz of the SITE Institute, Joseph H. Felter, Marc Sageman, Mike Ronczkowski.
Nothing in common there, eh?
The report only lists one web link, and even that one is, they admit, no longer functional. Nor does the report mention anything about the lame-ass government case against the kids entrapped in Miami, who, so far, have been found not guilty in two trials.
Here’s that outdated Al-Qaeda web link and what the committee says:
Al-Qaeda has long had a media committee and once operated the now defunct www. alneda.com, which pushed the core terrorist enlistment message and disseminated official statements from al-Qaeda leadership.
A porn king by the name of Messner “hacks” the site? Right, and I’ll buy the Brooklyn Bridge and that Arizona swampland, there.
OK, Joe boy, where’s the updated AQ web link? Maybe it’s buried, along with Bin Laden?
The report does show a picture of everyone’s favorite Jewish Jihadist, Adam Pearlman.
It also states that there have been many, violent terrorist attacks against the U.S., and its interests, but only names the biggies, like the 1993 WTC bombing, the MOSSAD attack on the US Cole and the MOSSAD/CIA combined operation of 9/11.
Our interests? LIke ensuring that the racist and Apartheid state of Israel can continue on its merry way, exterminating Palestinians thru genocide?
Is that one of our interests?
They go on to list several of these hotbeds of extremism, like Al-Furquan Media , which is on Blogger???
And As-Sahab Media , which i couldn’t find on Google, but Wikipedia does have a listing, created during November 2007, back when Joe Boy was holding one of his “terrorist” committee meetings. Just a coincidence, right?
Another, Sawt al-Jihad, is located on another blog site, Word Press.
An IP check of the Sawt domain listing shows the person registering the address lives in Jerusalem. ??? Is his nickname “Moshe?”
One location, they aren’t even sure of the name, calling it “Media Commission or Media Committee.” WTF? Make up you mind, there Joe Boy. Remember, you’re supposed to be scaring the hell out of us Americans so we’ll clamor for more laws and government monitoring of the Internet.
Yet another site, the Caliphate Voice Channel , is on Blogger and was last updated back in November 2006.
(Note: There was NO links in the report to the above sites, had to dig them out myself)
So, where is this Islamic conspiracy? And why in the hell are they using sites like Blogger? Can’t afford their own web pages or maybe the sites aren’t what they appear to be, maybe?
The Internet is now becoming a new front in the phony terror war.
Legislation like the Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act of 2007 that is in the forms of HR 1955 and S 1959 which seek to give the government powers to define thoughts and belief systems as homegrown terrorism, is on the brink of being pushed down our throats.
HR 1955 was passed by the U.S. House of Representatives by a vote of 404-6 and now it appears as if the U.S. Senate is attempting to justify its future passage.
The U.S. Senate homeland security committee lead by war mongering fascist Joseph Lieberman, investigated the so called growing threat of terrorists using the Internet for recruiting and training purposes.
In their report, they paint the Internet as a dangerous tool for terrorists and conclude that new laws need to be passed “to prevent the spread of the ideology.” It is incredibly convenient that S 1959 provides the legislation that is called for in their report.
The true purpose of this report is to push for the passage of S 1959 which will give the government powers similar to what the government of Oceania used in George Orwell’s book 1984.
The Hartford Courant ran an article on this Senate homeland security committee report. According to their article, the report hypes the threat of homegrown terrorism and how the Internet is playing a key role in spreading the message of so called terrorists. Below is a blurb taken from the article.
“A Senate homeland security committee report set for release Thursday details a growing threat from terrorists’ use of the Internet as a recruiting and training tool.
“The report concludes that the U.S. government should consider its own outreach program as a counter to the Web strategies of groups such as al-Qaida.
A draft of the staff-generated report obtained by The Courant says that ‘radicalization is no longer confined to training camps in Afghanistan or other locations far from our shores; it is also occurring right here in the United States.’
The homeland security committee, led by Sen. Joseph Lieberman, has investigated “the threat of homegrown terrorism” in several hearings since last year.
This report paints Internet use by terrorists as having an unlimited reach, including into English-speaking communities in the United States.
Al-Qaida, it says, runs a “a multi-tiered online media operation in which a number of production units associated with [al-Qaida] or allied violent Islamist organizations produce content consistent with the core terrorist enlistment message.”
The “thousands” of terrorist-operated websites have become “an effective distribution system for the core enlistment message and other content,” the report contends. There is no longer as much of a need, it suggests, for physical training camps”
First off, the threat of terrorist operated Internet sites is a complete fraud. IntelCenter a CIA front group which supposedly finds all of these Al-Qaeda terrorist video and audio tapes on the Internet never provides the source of where they obtain the terrorist propaganda.
If these materials were real terrorist propaganda and they didn’t want to reveal the source, why have we not seen warrants served, the web servers seized and people questioned? Why is it that the terrorist video and audio tapes that are released by this so called terrorist organization always seems to indirectly help the Bush administration? Since no warrants have been served, no Internet servers seized, no people questioned and the propaganda always seems to help the Bush administration it is pretty obvious that IntelCenter is the one releasing this so called terrorist propaganda.
After all, the Bush administration and the military industrial complex have a great deal to gain by ensuring that this phony terror war continues. In addition to this, if there were really thousands of these terrorist-operated Internet sites, how is it that a multi-billion dollar defense and intelligence apparatus is incapable of connecting the dots through these sites to track down these so called terrorist leaders like Osama Bin Laden, Ayman Al-Zawahri and Adam Gadahn? The answer is simple.
Al-Qaeda is a massive psychological warfare operation designed to make the American people believe that the war on terror is actually real.
The newly coined concept of homegrown terrorism is meant to target political dissidents and other individuals who do not like what the government is doing. It is specifically meant to target American citizens. There is no question that the alternative media which has flourished on the Internet is doing a great deal of damage to their psychological warfare operations.
Through S 1959, the establishment wants to give the government a blank check to define homegrown terrorism as anything they want so they can eventually arrest people for having particular belief systems. This legislation actually makes it legal for the government to arrest and prosecute people for thought crimes.
This would be a very handy tool for the government to use in cracking down on the alternative media which is increasingly speaking out against globalization.
It has nothing to do with the government keeping us safe from Al-Qaeda and groups affiliated with Al-Qaeda on the Internet. After all, Al-Qaeda was originally created by the CIA in the late 1970s and they’ve been controlled by them ever since.
Here’s more from the Hartford Courant article detailing the report’s conclusion on what needs to be done about terrorist activity on the Internet.
The report details four stages of developing a vulnerable person into a terrorist, as taught by New York Police Department specialists. ‘Left unchallenged, it is very possible that the core terrorist enlistment message espoused over the Internet will drive more individuals in the United States all the way through the four stages of the radicalization process,’ it says.
So, how would it be challenged? Right now “there is no cohesive and comprehensive outreach and communications strategy in place to confront this threat,” the report says.
Several agencies have existing, narrow missions, but the report argues for a more comprehensive approach. “We must isolate and discredit the violent Islamist ideology as a cause worth supporting.”
According to the report, new laws should be considered “to prevent the spread of the ideology.” And those looking for solutions need to act “quickly and aggressively.”
The report concludes: “The safety of the American people depends on it.”
Isn’t it interesting that S 1959 provides just the legislation that will achieve what this report concludes?
How does the U.S. government think they can prevent the spread of so called terrorist ideology through a law?
S 1959 is incredibly dangerous because it literally gives the government a blank check to constantly redefine what homegrown terrorism is. This means they can change the belief system that constitutes the ideology of homegrown terrorism and violent radicalization whenever they want.
S 1959 will literally legalize much of what the corrupt regime in George Orwell’s book 1984 utilized to keep control of their citizens.
Suffice to say, S 1959 is an unconstitutional piece of legislation, but that hasn’t stopped the traitors in the Senate homeland security committee from endorsing its virtues through the findings in this report.
They claim that the safety of the American people depend on them passing more legislation that restricts and reduces freedom. This is an absolute lie; because anytime you give up liberty for security you don’t get either one. There is no doubt that the purpose of this report is to convince the American people that S 1959 has to be passed.
Undoubtedly, most Americans would prefer to face the terrorists than have the government pass legislation like S 1959 that they claim is designed to protect us.
The government failed to protect us on September 11th, 2001 because they engineered the attacks to justify a police state in America and wage perpetual war.
If we had a real war on terror, there would be mass arrests of U.S. government officials and intelligence officers in the CIA, British Intelligence and the Mossad. We could temporarily house these terrorists in their nice little FEMA run concentration camps that they have already built.
It is a proven fact that the majority of real terrorism is sponsored by governments and their associated intelligence agencies. With that in mind, there is no question that this report from the Senate homeland security committee is a big load of horse crap.
(As inspired by a conversation with Derrick Jensen)
“There’s got to be just more to it than this; Or tell me why do we exist?”
–Iron Maiden
Is the Western consumerist culture that we inflict upon the rest of the world truly the pinnacle of our evolution? If it is, I resign my membership in the human race. Though I don’t fear that I’ll be compelled to tender my resignation any time soon because our so-called “non-negotiable American Way of Life” is a piece of shit, for myriad reasons.
We in the Western “developed” nations, particularly in the United States, are an utter disgrace to our species. Our myopic, self-centered, jejune, hubristic, and benighted ways of examining and interacting with the rest of the world, including other human animals, non-human animals, and Mother Earth herself, are reprehensible to the point of nausea and beyond.
And why wouldn’t they be? We carry perceived entitlement to such pathological lengths that we actually believe that the world and all of its inhabitants are resources we can objectify and use to enhance and ensure our “prosperity,” “security,” and “the growth of our economy.” We are conditioned to believe ahistorical, manipulative and grossly distorted sound-bites streamed into our shriveled, atrophied cerebrums by well-coiffed, polished talking head sycophants who owe their careerist souls to a system that is destroying the world.
And why wouldn’t we US Americans believe that our “shining city upon the hill” is entitled to whatever our little hearts desire (and our $1 trillion per year military can plunder)? We are all living large thanks to the genocide our forefathers committed against the natives of Turtle Island. After all, who’s going to worry about a little thing like 10-100 million dead “red men?” Or the 100 million black slaves who contributed mightily (and involuntarily I might add) to the development of our economic juggernaut of a nation? I can already see the shoulders shrugging and people assuaging potential guilt with the shop-worn arguments that “we’ve more than made it up to them,” “you can’t change the past,” or “I wasn’t there when it happened.” Well, guess what. I’m not suggesting reparations or apologies. Fuck applying band-aids to gaping wounds. We are barbarians masquerading as enlightened Christian folk—we’ve even deluded ourselves into believing our shit smells like roses. How far do we go before we call a halt to our insanity?
Stocks of large marine animals have fallen 90% since 1950. The polar bears and penguins are drowning and disappearing in droves. Cattle, pigs, and chickens suffer unspeakable horrors in torture facilities euphemistically labeled factory farms mostly so we can get our “fast food fix” and destroy the world one burger at a time by eating at McDonald’s. 50% of the world’s tropical forests are gone and if present trends continue they will all be gone by 2090. A unique species of life goes extinct every 20 minutes.
Conscienceless sociopaths like George W. Bush and Dick Cheney routinely rise to the ultimate positions of power, visibility and responsibility in our nightmare society. We have already slaughtered over a million Iraqis in retaliation for the 3,000 people they DIDN’T kill on 9/11. Disproportionate scapegoating at its finest. Job well done, USA! (One shudders to think how many we would’ve killed had Iraqis been the actual perpetrators of the WTC bombings).
I wonder, dear reader, if you are wondering the same thing I’m wondering as I’m writing: Just what the fuck is wrong with us? We US Americans excel at paying lip service to worshipping Christ and/or the God of the Old Testament, but the truth is that our real god is Mammon. Even those who reject mainstream culture and its obsession with wealth and material possessions are forced to subjugate themselves to the almighty dollar in our filthy capitalist dog-eat-dog, winner-take-all system.
We fancy ourselves to have a monopoly on “freedom” and “decency.” In fact, we’ve mind-fucked ourselves into believing it is our “duty” to “civilize” the rest of the world. In reality we are wage and debt slaves who each play a role in perpetuating a system that is grossly immoral, exploitative, and malevolent. We export our evil via our blood-drenched foreign policy. “Get them before they get us” is our motto—even if we happen to be the equivalent of Mike Tyson pulverizing an infant. Hey, he might’ve attacked us when he grew up, right?
For those of us who haven’t had every shred of moral decency indoctrinated out of us, there is cause for some optimism. Like a pyramid balancing on its apex, capitalism is destined to topple. Linear, short-sighted, chaotic, grossly immoral, and dependent upon infinite growth in a finite world, it has already reached obsolescence in the minds of most intellectually honest critical thinkers. Its myriad victims have discovered perhaps its ultimate vulnerability: asymmetric warfare. In its insatiable thirst to commodify everything, capitalism is at odds with Mother Nature herself. If the victims of imperialism and monopoly capitalism don’t bring this son of a bitch down, the Earth will. And I feel confident that I speak for many when I state that the world will be truly blessed when our violent, hierarchal, and malignant culture of murder and mayhem is throttled to death like a perpetrator who finally encounters a victim with the means to eradicate him.
Meanwhile, we can accelerate the demise of the dominant culture, as Derrick Jensen has labeled our rotten-to-the-core Westernized, capitalistic way of being. As Jensen suggests, we need to build upon the culture of resistance that is rapidly expanding in the pre-revolutionary environment in which we find ourselves.
As the inevitable revolution or crash approaches (the power elite can only fuck the people or the environment so hard before the backlash takes them out), there are many things we can do (each according to our abilities and resources) to monkey wrench this merciless, murderous machine.
Students of history will note that all manner of people and activities are necessary to bring down a deeply entrenched rotten and oppressive establishment. Strikers, boycotters, organizers, thinkers, writers, spiritual leaders, protestors, civil disobedients, conscientious objectors, providers of resources, and groups engaged in direct action like the ALF are all essential to the success of resisting the considerable might and tenacity of those who hold a majority of the world’s wealth and power.
So, as Jensen suggests, find what you love and do it in such a way that it puts a little more wobble on that inverted pyramid.
And when the time comes, those of us who are clinging to our guns so bitterly will know what to do with them.
This may be one of the more controversial articles I’ve written, and I suspect it will many a reader uncomfortable. But, we all need to look at topics that make us uncomfortable. Comfort and safety are polar opposites. To secure our future, we must listen to those unsavory rebels who are trying to tell us the truth. As George Orwell himself said, “During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act.”
Controversy is only dreaded by the advocates of error. – Benjamin Rush (1746-1813) American physician, writer, educator
A subject that has been taboo to many researchers over the years is the Holocaust. There are three reasons for the natural aversion society feels to questioning the topic. One of them, is the “thought crime” laws passed in various parts of this world, notably Canada and about ten E.U. countries, threatening those who choose to question what may have happened with jail time. This has been compounded with the loaded charge of “Holocaust denier,” which can ruin many an academic career.
The second reason, is the mental conditioning the American public, and a good part of the Western world, has gone through. The joke of a simplified politically correct, as written by the winners, system of historical education aside, we’ve also been programmed via scores of Hollywood movies depicting the Holocaust; one-dimensional evil Germans and equally one-dimensional happenstance poor Jews. {*1} The third is collective guilt instilled by Western education for allowing it to happen, or not doing enough to stop it.
Now, that all said, I wish to re-examine what we know of the Holocaust, and invite you to do it along with me. No, this is not “Holocaust Denial,” because the Holocaust was very real and very tragic. The over-used and slanderous Holocaust Denier label has been carefully crafted, to focus the debate on what happened, and prevent those who are prone to ask questions, from ever finding out who was behind the Holocaust.
The dust of controversy is merely the falsehood flying off. – Thomas Carlyle (1795-1881) British historian and essayist.
This video may be long, and it may make many uncomfortable (it did me the first time I saw this). But, we all need to watch it, and more importantly, ask the questions that need to be asked, starting with Qui Bono?
Norman Finkelstein, a Jew, and the son of a Holocaust survivor, dared to write an excellent concise book, The Holocaust Industry, which while not going as far as the above video, dared to ask the question, “Who has benefited from all these Holocaust settlements?” He pointed out that his mother, had, to date, received approximately $250, while the super-rich front-men of the extortion operation like Edgar Bronfman (of Seagram & Sons) and Abe Foxman, the current head of the nefarious ADL organization, have made untold millions. Finkelstein’s reward? A smear campaign by the ADL to deny him tenure.
Undoubtedly, some, due to either brainwashing or lacking the ability to think critically, will Pavlovianly label me as and Jim Conduit as antisemites, and then, apply the Woody Allenesque label of “Self-Loathing Jew” to Normal Finkelstein. Those old labels are tired and over-used. Don’t fall into the trap of using them. Stop being a victim of media mind manipulation.
“Antisemitism” itself is a superfluous phrase. {*2} Racism is racism. Why is there a special label for some particular brand of it. Why is there no such thing as anti-blackism, anti-asianism or anti-arabism? A Semite is basically a person allegedly descended from one of Noah’s sons, Shem. As there is no way to ascertain Shem’s DNA, the label Semite is generally applied to peoples who speak any of the Semitic languages, like Hebrew or Arabic.
This has got nothing to do with Judaism. This is about Zionism. It is not a religion. It is a political movement. Equating Jews with Zionism is akin to equating Christians with Neoconservatism.
“The Zionists brought us to the Holocaust. It is well known that it was possible to redeem Jews from the Nazis with money, and save many … all hundreds of thousands of Jews in Hungary…THE ZIONIST LEADERS WHO NOW SIT IN GOVERNMENT PREVENTED IT!” – Rabbi Shlomo Zalman Ehrenreich (circa 1954)
The most telling sign that there may be something to Conduit’s intelligent analysis, is one he did not elaborate on. We need to break down the word Holocaust etymologically. It is a Hebrew word. {*3} What does it mean? Ready for this? “Burnt offering.” No, it doesn’t mean tragedy, genocide, or mass-murder. It is a sacrificial burnt offering. The word didn’t even come into mass use until 1968. Who would use a Hebrew word to describe the event that would imply sacrifice to some “gods” somewhere? Use your critical thinking ability. No, not the Germans. The Zionists!
The Zionists needed European Jewry to move to this plot of land they would call Israel. The Jews of Europe were, as one would expect, not into the idea. And, who could blame them? They had done well for themselves in Europe and had become part of the communities where they lived. So, why on earth would they leave everything they’d built behind and go fight to take over someone else’s land in the middle of the dessert?
Well, logic would dictate they wouldn’t. Unless, of course, someone could engineer an event that would force them to leave. Creating the state, however, was in violation of the teachings of the Torah; that only God could bring about a Jewish homeland. However, those who follow weird occult Talmudic beliefs, might justify a man-made IsRaEl, by offering a great sacrifice (i.e., burnt offering) to appease the vengeful Gods of old. {*4} And note, as the video points out, after that puppet Hitler rose to power and began anti-Jewish measures, the USA was all too willing to bar Jewish immigration.
Another very important piece of supporting evidence to this new paradigm of thinking are the origins of the current ethnic make-up of Israel. Most of the Jews in the world today (roughly 90%) are of Ashkenazi descent. The Ashkenazi Jews are the Khazars, which consisted mainly of ethnic Turks (some argue Huns or Mongols) who adopted Judaism as their religion. Today, in Israel, the most repressed minority is surprisingly, not the Palestinians, nor the Arab Israelis, but the Sephardic Jews. And, for those with more esoteric awareness, there is one more telling sign: Ashkenazi. Just stop and think about it. {*5}
Yes. This is Holocaust Truth. The Holocaust Denial game is a statistics trap used to lure progressive thinkers, and either toss them in jail or otherwise dissuade them from their quest, before they get to the core of the truth. The people presently in charge of Israel are the great betrayers of their own people. Should the Jews of the world ever wake up to this truth, the worst massacres of the Old Testament may look tame compared to what they will do to their Zionist overlords. {*6}
There is nothing to fear except the persistent refusal to find out the truth, the persistent refusal to analyze the causes of happenings. – Dorothy Thompson (1893-1961) American journalist.
This is the truth. The truth is scary. The truth is not politically correct. The truth does not fit into the black and white world your momma and daddy raised you in. Grow up. Wake up. Face the truth.
How Not To Be Interviewed By CNN About The Holocaust By Edgar J. Steele Conspiracypenpal.com 1-28-5
I fielded several calls from CNN producers the other day. “Somebody” had given them my name as someone they might want to interview to provide counterpoint to their coverage today, which predictably will gush in support of all things Jewish. They discussed sending out a camera crew to film me being profiled with my commentary. Obviously, the idea was to get a foil to make look foolish…the typical, inarticulate and irrational “hater” to be vilified on camera. I know that always is the media’s agenda when its minions approach me, but I am willing to play along, anyway, because I count on being able to hold my own with anybody on politically-incorrect subjects.
One of them asked if I believed in the Holocaust. “Do I believe Jews died or do I believe 6,000,000 Jews were gassed and cremated?” I responded. The latter, she said. “No – that’s complete rubbish, as a little logic will demonstrate,” I replied. “Here, let me explain.”
“Consider why Germany, fighting a war on two fronts, desperate for fuel and materiel of every sort, would bother to load millions of Jews on railroad cars and transport them hundreds, even thousands, of miles to concentration camps. Camps built specifically to house them, where they would be fed, clothed, even tattooed so they could be inventoried…just to kill them.”
“Look,” I continued, “it doesn’t even begin to make sense. If they wanted Jews dead, they would have done it the same way that Russian Jews had been doing it to millions and millions (20 to 80 million, depending upon to whom you talk) of White Christians for the past thirty years at the time: with a bullet to the base of the skull, wherever they might be found.”
There was a long pause. I used it to add: “As my buddy Al likes to say, ‘In all of German-occupied Europe, there were 2.4 million Jews. After the war, 3.8 million Jews applied for Holocaust reparations. Tragically, the remaining 6 million were lost.'”
More silence. (I imagined her feverishly taking notes.) “Did you know that WWII wasn’t the first time that Jews claimed 6,000,000 of their number were eradicated in a genocidal frenzy?” I asked. “No – no, I didn’t,” came the tentative response. “WWI,” I said. “They made the exact, same claim, but they would like us to forget about that now. And that wasn’t the first time either. You might ask what is so magic about the 6 million figure – well, it derives from their Talmud, which teaches that their Messiah will not come until 6 million Jews are slaughtered.” I resisted the almost-overwhelming urge to point out that Israel’s current Jewish population is just about 6 million and then ask if she believed in religious prophecy.
“How do you know this is true?” she asked.
“Well, the Talmud is there for anybody to read. Besides, they keep changing the plaques at Auschwitz. First it was 4 million killed there, said the memorial plaque, which now has been replaced with a plaque that claims 1.5 million. Even so, the 6 million figure never got knocked down by the 2.5 million Auschwitz reduction.” (Go here for a particularly illuminating article which puts the final Auschwitz figure at about 140,000, based on documents released following the Soviet collapse.)
More silence, then she asked if I had any other thoughts on Auschwitz. “Where do I begin?” I began.
“Did you know that, when the Russians were about to “liberate” Auschwitz, most of the Jewish prisoners, including Elie Wiesel, famed Nazi hunter, and Otto Frank, Anne Frank’s father, elected to move to another camp with their German captors, rather than await the arrival of the Russians? If the Germans were so bad and such rampant killers, why not wait for the Russians? By the way, did you know that the last part of Anne Frank’s handwritten diary was done in ball-point pen, which wasn’t even invented until after the end of the war?” (Anne Frank died of typhus before war’s end.) “Did you know that Otto has paid court-ordered restitution to at least one individual who claimed to have been hired to write the diary?”
“What about all the pictorial evidence?” she asked.
“Mostly faked,” I replied. “All those pictures of skinny people and bodies stacked like cordwood were actually of Czechs and Poles and Germans. And they died of Typhus, which was rampant in the camps, not gas chambers. Simon Wiesenthal, whose Southern California museum is supported by taxpayer dollars, has been shown repeatedly to use faked photographs in his exhibits. A great many photographs were faked for the trumped-up Nuremberg trials, for which German confessions were extracted by torture, a notoriously unreliable interrogation technique. Tellingly, several confessions, written out in English, were signed by German officers, though they didn’t speak a word of English.
“There’s a famous photo of Auschwitz where smoke from alleged crematoria was added by Wiesenthal to “prove” the existence of ovens. Problem is, eventually the original surfaced, with no smoke to be seen. And Allied flyovers never reported any billowing smoke from any of the camps, either.”
“Do you have these pictures?” she asked.
“Yep, and documentary proof of everything I say. And, I can put my hands on it in mere minutes, at most.”
For example, now you see it…….now you don’t.
The first photo was downloaded from Wiesenthal’s own web page at http://motlc.wiesenthal.com/, though removed, of course, once the original was found in Auschwitz Album 1978 (1st edition, Beate Klarsfeld Foundation, New York, 1978, photo No. 165). No wonder the Jews had to invent a word for that characteristic to which they refer as “chutzpah,” a word which simply has no English equivalent.
I went on to point out that there is absolutely no evidence of skinshade lamps, soap rendered from human fat, gas chambers, crematoria or of huge pits of either ash or bodies. More silence. “The sole gas chamber at Auschwitz is acknowledged and now labeled to be a reproduction constructed by the Russians. A phony reproduction, according to camp records.”
“Why would they lie about all these things?” asked the CNN producer.
“To engender an ethnocentric feeling of unity among Jews and simultaneously guilt trip all the rest of us into submission. Besides, it’s been a huge moneymaker for them. Don’t forget the Mossad’s motto: ‘By Way of Deception, Thou Shalt Do War.'”
Watching old movies makes me sad. I’m inevitably reminded of a kindlier, gentler world without cameras that spy on populations, where overseas travelling was pleasurable and privacy was an individual’s right.
Nowadays, states are usurping responsibilities that are rightfully those of their citizens. Western so-called democracies, in particular, are supposed to have governments that are servants of the people, whereas, in fact, the opposite is true. Under the guise of doing what’s best for us or ensuring our security, governments are exercising more and more control over our lives. And, tragically, we are facilitating this erosion of our own freedoms, mostly because we’re not even aware it’s happening.
The US and Britain are leading the pack in this encroaching Orwellian nightmare. “War is peace; Freedom is slavery; Ignorance is strength,” wrote George Orwell in his book Nineteen Eighty-Four. In recent years, they have waged wars in the name of peace, put entire populations under their thumb in the name of freedom while government spin and a compliant media serve to keep people ignorant about their leaders’ true motives.
If we only knew it we are being indoctrinated to offer up our personal freedoms to save ourselves from a horrible fate at the hands of nicotine, calories and Al Qaida. We are being taught to fear asylum seekers, climate change, crazed terrorists and even each other. Western governments are perfecting the politics of fear because fearful populaces will do their bidding without question and willingly subject themselves to control.
Britain has become a master of this technique. It currently holds a data base containing the DNA of 4.5 million people, arrested for both serious crimes and minor infractions. The police have found this tool so useful they are pushing to expand it to cover everyone in the country although the Home Office has rejected the idea for the moment.
By 2012 Britons over 16 will be required to hold biometric ID cards checkable by police, immigration and customs officials as well as public and private bodies such as travel agencies, airlines, banks and even retailers.
By 2010, Britain is also expected to incorporate Radio Frequency Identification memory chip in passports designed to carry a wealth of personal data on travellers.
Embedded
Further, there is a plan to embed RFID chips in vehicle number plates allowing authorities the capability of identifying any vehicle anywhere in all weathers. RFID chips have been embedded on every packet of cigarettes manufactured in the UK since October last year, while others have been fitted to trash cans officially to boost the rate of garbage recycling. Pets entering Britain from abroad are also chipped.
Apparently, the government is also considering injecting prisoners with RFID tags. If that goes ahead it’s surely the slippery slope to babies being chipped at birth.
US has forced European airlines to hand over 19 pieces of information on travellers prior to their departure and wants to extend this one-way data flow to passengers over-flying the US en route to Central America and the Caribbean. UK wants the system to be used throughout Europe and domestically.
Not only do authorities want to control Britons’ movements, they are also after their thoughts. Remember the Orwellian Thought Police, who used surveillance methods and psychological profiles to interpret the future goals of potential dissenters and deviants? This is already happening in the UK where people can expect to be caught on camera up to 300 times per day and where their phone calls and internet browsing is routinely monitored.
Earlier this month, three British Appeal judges had the good sense to quash the convictions of five young Muslims, prosecuted for simply downloading “extremist propaganda” from the internet. There was no other evidence against them and no proof they intended to act on any message contained in such material. In other words, their initial conviction was purely based on thought crime. The judgment read: “Literature may be stored in a book or on a bookshelf, or on a computer drive, without any intention on the part of the possessor to make any future use of it all.”
Big Brother Britain isn’t working. Indeed, the prisons are full to over-flowing and violent crime is on the up-and-up, much of it fuelled by drugs and alcohol. You’ve surely heard the expression “give a dog a bad name …” Could it be that when law-abiding citizens are pre-judged as criminals some of them might conclude “What the heck”?
But Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-four isn’t exactly where Britain is headed. The reality is a combination of Orwell’s theories and those set-out in Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World.
As the American author Neil Postman wrote in his book Amusing Ourselves to Death whereas “Orwell feared the truth would be concealed from us, Huxley feared the truth would be droned in a sea of irrelevance. Orwell feared we would become a captive culture. Huxley feared we would become a trivial culture” consumed by “an almost infinite appetite for distractions”.
In a way they were both right. Unless we tear ourselves away from our pretty toys and distractions just long enough to remove our rose-coloured specs, freedom will be obsolete except as a slogan above the gate of the Ministry of Truth.
Linda S. Heard is a specialist writer on Middle East affairs. She can be contacted at lheard@gulfnews.com.
Why is the “Thought Crime” bill still in Committee?
As the vultures drift slowly overhead, descending in ever decreasing circles to feast on the carcass of the democratic republic formerly known as America, signs of life are detected.
The damned body is still moving!! That’s most distasteful to these buzzards. Even though these particular genus of buzzards, such as the “Pelosi Backstabbererus”, the “Reid Suckerupus” and the most ravenous of all, the “Cheney Murderusallus” will eat a moving body, they prefer to tear off and ingest whole chunks of dead and decaying flesh.
This morbid crew knows they can count of another of their species, the “Lieberman Asskisserus” to deliver the final blow to the highly desired body by cutting out its heart with his “Thought Crime” Prevention Act–Senate Bill 1959
All kidding aside, why is the Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terror Prevention Act of 2007 still stuck in the Senate?
Back in October 2007, the U.S. House of Representatives rushed thru this particular heinous piece of legislation, using a little used parliamentary procedure. Pelosi helped rush thru the bill without giving our reps time to read the bill.
Or maybe that U.S. Senator from Tel Aviv, Joe Lieberman, “Big Dick” Cheney and his trained sidekick, the Filipino Monkey Boy, are waiting for the next “false-flag” op against Americans to finally shove this freedom smashing piece of legislation down our throats… and up another orifice.
Like the MOSSAD/CIA 9/11 attacks that gave the Zionists and NeoCONs what they wanted: A blank check to wage endless wars in the Middle East against “existential” enemies of Israel at the same time, to wage endless wars against Americans at home by passing the misnamed “Patriot Act”, shredding mightily the Constitution and Bill of Rights.
A shredding of that hallowed document that has been ongoing for a number of years, dating back to the Clinton presidency. That was when the original concept of the Patriot Act was fleshed out, giving one person, President Clinton, the power to decide who was a “terrorist.”
Except back then, some Republicans weren’t too enamored of the idea of giving that kind of power to “Slick Willie.”
But with one of their boys in charge, then “Hey” it’s a damn fine idea.
What else could one expect from the “Commander-in-Thief”, who has these thoughts on the Constitution?
“I don’t give a goddamn,” Bush retorted. “I’m the President and the Commander-in-Chief. Do it my way.”
“Mr. President,” one aide in the meeting said. “There is a valid case that the provisions in this law undermine the Constitution.”
“Stop throwing the Constitution in my face,” Bush screamed back. “It’s just a goddamned piece of paper!”
A piece of paper that will soon be used as toilet paper, by our Commander-in-Thief. After the next 9/11 type “false-flag” attack on either America or on American kids, stuck in Iraq, fighting wars for Empire and Israel.
Then, all the pieces will fall into place. The Zionists will get another ME war, fought by American kids, against another of Israel’s “existential”, enemies, Iran.
Cheney will tell his sidekick to declare “Martial Law”. But only to protect We the People from ourselves.
And the “Thought Crime” prevention act will be passed into law, thereby effectively killing the Internet.
When the body finally stops showing any signs of life, the buzzards will sweep down and enjoy a sumptuous feast.
The Internet is now becoming a new front in the phony terror war.
kenny's sideshow 